Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ-Case law-2013/14-1585

Whether conversion of shipping bill under drawback scheme to advance licence scheme possible?

Case: - CHERMA'S EXQUISITE LTD. VS COMMR. OF CUS. (EXPORTS), CHENNAI
 
Citation: - 2013 (288) E.L.T. 545 (Tn. - Chennai)
 
Brief facts:- The facts of the case are that the appellants filed a shipping bill  on 2-7-2009 for export of ready garments under advance licence cum duty drawback scheme. Thereafter, they moved an application for conversion of the part of the consignment under drawback scheme to advance licence scheme on 15-9-2009. As the appellants were given the benefit of drawback scheme before their filing of the request on 15-9-2009 and considering the fact that the appellants are not entitled for benefit of conversion as per board’s circular No. 4/2004-Cus., dated 16-1-2004, their request for conversion from duty drawback scheme to advance licence scheme was denied. Against the said order, the appellant is in appeal before the tribunal.
 
Appellant contention :-  On the behalf of the appellants, Shri A.K. Jayaraj, Advocate appears and submits that although the duty drawback scheme has been sanctioned but the appellants are ready to pay back the duty drawback claimed along with interest till the date when the conversion is allowed. He further submits that they are entitled for conversion of shipping bill from drawback scheme to advance licence scheme as per Board’s Circular No. 4/2004-Cus., dated 16-1-2004 as their claim for conversion to advance licence scheme was not denied by the DGFT, Department of commerce or the Customs due to any dispute. Further he submitted that as part of the consignment was under advance licence scheme and a part of the consignment was under duty drawback scheme and the consignment was examined at the time of export of the goods, and all the documents available at the time of clearance of goods as required by section 149 of the customs act, 1962, therefore, their claim for conversion from duty drawback scheme to advance licence scheme be granted.
 
Respondent contention:-The learned SDR  strongly opposed the contention of leaned counsel and submitted that as the appellants have already got duty drawback sanctioned by the adjudicating authority, therefore, they cannot take cannot take double benefit at this stage. Further, he submitted that the adjudicating authority has considered their claim from all the angles and thereafter has come to the decision that their request for conversion from duty drawback scheme to advance licence scheme cannot be accepted on the premise that for export under advance licence scheme requires rigorous examination of goods as compared to the duty drawback scheme and the quantities mentioned in the advance licence has already been exported by the appellants. Therefore, they cannot export more quantity against the licence.
 
Reasoning of judgement: -Considering the submissions made by both sides, in this case, the appellant filed a shipping Bill no. 3419019 on 2-7-2009 for export readymade garments. Part of the consignment was under advance licence scheme and part of consignment was under drawback scheme. The request for conversion was made on 15-9-2009 within 2.5 month for conversion of drawback scheme to advance licence No. 0910037756. The denial was made on the following grounds:-
(a)   the drawback has already been sanctioned.
(b)  They are not covered by Board’s circular No. 4/2004-Cus., dated 16-1-2004 and
(c)   Goods require rigorous examination at the time of export under advance licence scheme.
 
With regard to first ground for denial, the appellants are ready to pay drawback availed by them along with interest. Therefore, the claim cannot be denied on the ground. The denial on the second ground that the Board’ Circular No. 4/2004-Cus., dated 16-1-2004 is not sustainable as the conversion under advance licence scheme has not been denied by the DGFT or ministry of commerce or customs due to any dispute therefore, conversion from drawback scheme to advance licence scheme is available to the appellant. Further, part of the consignment was under advance licence scheme and part of the consignment was under the drawback scheme and at the time export, the consignment was examined by the customs authorities as per advance licence scheme. Therefore, conversion can be allowed and cannot be denied on this premise only. The contention of learned SDR that the appellants have already fulfilled the export obligation against licence No. 010037756, therefore, they are not entitled to take benefit of the said licence is not sustainable as the revenue is getting the amount paid to the appellants under drawback scheme along with the interest and it is immaterial whether they will get benefit under the advance licence scheme or not. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed to with consequential relief. Appellant shall approach within 15 days of communication of this order before the authorities concerned with a proof of payment of duty drawback along with interest for conversion of their shipping bill from drawback scheme to advance licence scheme and thereafter within 15 days, the adjudicating authority shall allow conversion of shipping bill from duty drawback scheme to advance licence scheme as per section 149 of the customs Act, 1962.  
 
Decision: -Appeal Allowed.
 
Comment:-The Analogy drawn from this case is that if export is made through shipping bill under duty drawback scheme then that shipping bill can be converted from drawback scheme to advance licence scheme on payment of drawback claimed earlier along with interest as per the section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962.
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com