Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   Higher oil prices, GST may boost states revenue by Rs 37,400 crore in FY19  *   These taxpayers no more at mercy of GST intermediaries *  Budget 2018: No fiscal derailment, but a lot rides on GST; expect caution from RBI *  GST: E-way bill implementation deferred due to glitches *  Homebuyers must avoid traps on the name of NO GST Impact *   Govt will formulate a comprehensive gold policy to develop gold as an asset class *   Government to evolve to asign a unique id to every individual enterprise. *   1.48 lakh crore for rail budget. *   7148 Crore to be sanctioned to textile sector. *   3700 corore for SME industry *  16000 crore for free electricity connection *   Government ignored warnings over GST rollout: sources *  GSTR 3B questionaire introduced- To be filled before filing return *  Advisory mail  to all the taxpayers received from GSTN *   Advisory group on GST submits report, suggests changes *   GST lifted oil demand on higher vehicle sales, says report *   Moody’s gives thumbs up to GST, demonetisation  *   Pass on rate cut benefits immediately, companies tell traders *   Focus will now be on simplifying forms, IT processes under GST: Sushil Modi *  Tax rates lowered on consumer goods,only luxury goods taxed @ 28% *   Businesses can revise GST transition claim form now *  Multiplex owners in UP demand clarity on refund as tax exemptions go away after GST *   GST compliance: A case of much ado about nothing *  PM hints more relief for traders & businesses to ease GST compliance burden *  Infosys deploys more people in states to ease GSTN load *   Further reforms are needed for the GST to succeed *   GST impact! Massive stock clearance discounts on apparels, gadgets likely in December *  Kerala HC releases Detained Goods since State has No Power to make Rules to regulate Inter-State movement of Goods under GST *  Infosys is to blame for GST Network glitches, say government officials *   Publishers versus authors: Who will pay GST on royalty?
Subject News *  GST Council to discuss annual return forms; experts expect reconciliation with ITR. *  Panel Of Ministers Mulls 1% Cess On Luxury Items, Tobacco To Help Farmers *  GST Council to consider rate cut on items with low revenue impact on July 21 *  E-way bills have increased our, liability – transporter says *  One year of GST: the successes,failures and what's next on the agenda *  GST Rate cuts could come sooner *  GST Is Not All That Bad-small Businesses  *  Govement Extends Sale Of Pre-GST Goods With Stickers Of Revised Price Till July 31 *  Government Collects Rs 95,610 Crore GST In May *  28th GST Council Meeting Date announced *  Rs. 672 Crore Worth GST Evasion Detected In Jaipur *  Rs 38,062 Crore Refund Claims of Exporters were cleared Till June 16 *   Finance Ministry Likely to Launch Annual GST Return Forms in Next Council Meet *   Taxpayers can now change email, mobile number under GST system. Here's how to do it  *  Rs 70-bn GST refunds of exporters cleared *  Gujarat tops e-way bill collection since April *  Tax authorities send notices to businesses for less IGST input credit claim *  Petrol, diesel rates: Reduction in oil duties best solution to check fuel price rise *  GST council to discuss about bringing natural Gas in GST *   GST Council is working towards rationalizing GST rates *  GST Council approves monthly return filing system to come into force in six months. *  No E-way Bill is required in West Bengal for Intrastate *  Rate notified on PSLC and REC   *  No Late Fee for Delayed filing of  GSTR-5A - Non Resident OIDAR Service Providers *  CBIC clears double taxation under GST kept in bonded warehouses *  Update on New Functionality on GST Portal : Tracking ARN for Exports  *   RBI policy: GST-hit small business get more time, money *   GST’s e-way bill set for a month-end rollout after tech glitches pushed it off-track on Feb 1 *  GST on Bitcoin-Crypto currency trade may get taxed 18% *  GST on Electric Car Batteries Could Come Down Drastically  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-17/3442

Whether condonation of delay allowed if appeal wrongly filed under different jurisdiction?
Case:-LATHIA INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES CO. PVT. LTD. VersusCESTAT WEST ZONAL BENCH
Citation:-2016 (342) E.L.T. 535 (Guj.)
Issue:- Whether condonation of delay allowed if appeal wrongly filed under different jurisdiction?
Brief facts:- This petition was filed with following relief :-
“[A] Your Lordships may be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned Order No. A/10806/2014, dated 10-4-2014 passed by the Hon’ble CESTAT, West Zonal Bench, Ahmedabad. Application no. and further be pleased to quash and set aside the Order-in-Appeal No. 185/2012(Ahd-II)CE/AK/Commr(A)/Ahd., dated 30-9-2013 and Order-in-Original No. 9/AC/2012, dated 19-10-2012, passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Division I, Ahmedabad in the interest of justice;”
The brief facts are as under :-
The petitioner-company was engaged in business of manufacture of goods like Rubber Roll, Rubber Blanker, etc. and was availing exemption scheme as a Small Scale Industrial Unit.
The Department alleged that the petitioner-company had wrongly availed Cenvat credit in relation to certain items like Rubber/Ebonite Roll, for which show cause notice dated 9-8-2012 was issued calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why Cenvat credit of Rs. 4,90,159/- be not reversed on account of such wrongful availement. The Deputy Commissioner confirmed the demand in the show cause notice by passing Order-in-Original dated 19-10-2012.
Aggrieved by the Order-in-Original, the petitioner preferred appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals-I) and as there was delay of 64 days, filed a separate application for condonation of delay. The ground for delay as contended by the petitioner was that under a mistake, the appeal came to be filed before a wrong forum of the same Department and when such mistake was realized, the aforementioned delay had occurred.
The Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Excise, Ahmedabad dismissed the application for condonation of delay in view of Section 35 of the Central Excise Act. Such order came to be passed on 30-9-2013.
The petitioner preferred appeal before the CESTAT against order dated 30-9-2013 and CESTAT vide order dated 10-4-2014 rejected the appeal.
 
Appellant’s contention:-Learned Senior Advocate Shri Deven Parikh with learned Advocate Shri Kunal Nanavati for the petitioner submitted that in fact when the appeal came to be filed against the Order-in-Original, there was no delay. However, such appeal was filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) having a different jurisdiction instead of filing such appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Excise, Ahmedabad. Learned Senior Advocate took through the document at Annexure-G which bore the stamp of the appeal having been filed before a different forum and contended that the view taken by the Commissioner (Appeals) as well as CESTAT was hyper-technical in nature and that on merits, the petitioner had an excellent case which required adjudication rather than being scuttled on technical grounds.
 
Respondent’s contention:- Learned Advocate Shri Chintan Dave appearing for the Department had filed an affidavit in the Civil Application to answer this contention of the petitioner. He had also produced xerox copy of the Registers of the concerned Department. Despite this position, the Court had called upon learned Advocate Shri Dave to personally verify the Registers and verify the claim made by the petitioner with regard to filing of the appeal before a wrong forum, to which Shri Dave stated that he had personally verified the Inward Register maintained by the office where according to the petitioner the appeal was initially filed and had confirmed that such appeal was indeed filed before that authority. He therefore urged that he would not seriously object if the matter was remanded back to the stage of Commissioner (Appeals).
 
Reasoning of judgement:-In view of the aforementioned fact situation, on this short ground, the Court was inclined to remain the matter back to the state of appeal to be heard by the Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Excise, Ahmedabad. The Commissioner (Appeals) took into consideration the contentions of the petitioner regarding filing of the appeal in time, but before a different forum in accordance with law. 
Accordingly, the petition was allowed to the aforesaid extent. The matter was remanded back, to be heard by the Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Excise, Ahmedabad. Considering the period that had lapsed, the Commissioner (Appeals) may take up hearing of this case expeditiously. Rule was made absolute. No order as to costs.
In view of the order passed in the main matter, CA does not survive. Disposed of accordingly.
 
Decision:-Petition allowed.
Comment:- The analogy of case was that if delay in filing the appeal occurs due to the fact that the appeal is mistakenly filed before a wrong forum of the same Department and the petitioner corrects the samewhen such mistake is realized, then the application for condonation of delay cannot be dismissed as the appeal cannot be quashed on technical grounds.
 
Prepared by: RAKSHAY TATER
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com