Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   RTI applicant in Madhya Pradesh asked to pay GST for information *   India’s GST collection drops to Rs93,960cr in August *   Karnataka Taxmen arrest two Bengaluru businessmen in GST related fraud *  Govt may soon impose IGST on ex-factory sales; decision in September. *  Niti Aayog Suggests Slashing Import Duty, GST On Gold *  Kerala Floods: Relief Goods Exempted From Customs Duty, IGST *  No GST On Petrol, Diesel In Near Future As Centre, States Not In Favour. *  Kerala plans to raise Rs 7.5 bn through hiked liquor duty & 10% cess on GST. *  Orissa HC directs authorities not to take action against importers on GST. *  Firms can't be selective in passing on rate cut benefits under GST regime *  Technical glitches continue to haunt the Goods and Services Tax Network *  GST Annual Return: Everything you need to know about the format, eligibility & rules around GSTR 9  *  Post GST, J&K’s own tax collection drops by Rs 1,300 crore since July 2017 *  GST Council may replace 12% and 18% slabs with 14-15% one: Sushil Modi *  Domino’s lands in trouble for not passing on GST cuts *   Higher oil prices, GST may boost states revenue by Rs 37,400 crore in FY19  *   These taxpayers no more at mercy of GST intermediaries *  Budget 2018: No fiscal derailment, but a lot rides on GST; expect caution from RBI *  GST: E-way bill implementation deferred due to glitches *  Homebuyers must avoid traps on the name of NO GST Impact *   Govt will formulate a comprehensive gold policy to develop gold as an asset class *   Government to evolve to asign a unique id to every individual enterprise. *   1.48 lakh crore for rail budget. *   7148 Crore to be sanctioned to textile sector. *   3700 corore for SME industry *  16000 crore for free electricity connection *   Government ignored warnings over GST rollout: sources *  GSTR 3B questionaire introduced- To be filled before filing return *  Advisory mail  to all the taxpayers received from GSTN *   Advisory group on GST submits report, suggests changes
Subject News *  State appellate body upholds GST on liquidated damages.  *  Consumer durables firms, GST body continue to spar over profiteering *   225 million e-way bills generated across India since GST rollout *   September last month to fix GST filing errors *   Due date of TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 is extended *   Extension of Due date for GSTR-3B only for newly migrated taxpayers *   Extension of Due date for GSTR-1 *   Taxpayer with turnover over Rs 2 cr need GST audit certificate, will be arduous job for auditors *   Whether the appellants are eligible for refund of the duty claimed to have been paid in excess on the basis of DMT of the goods? Whether the said claim of refund is sustainable without challenging the assessment of the shipping bills. (Source:PJ/CASE LAW/2018-2019/3479) *   GST Flash Updates on various circulars and notifications dated 04/09/2018 *   GST Update on Circular No. 61/2018-GST dated 04.09.2018 *   GST Update on disharmony in CGST and SGST *    Update on restriction of refund of IGST paid on exports under Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules *   1,800 businesses migrate to GST regime *   ‘Missing’ service tax credit in GST update worries companies  *   Government notifies new annual return form for GST *  Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff. *  : Whether processing of secondary raw materials(steel scrap of different and variable composition) into blended steel scrap is liable for payment of central excise duty under the provision of the central excise Act,1944?Can  such “blended metal scrap” can be classified under tariff item 72044900 of the central excise tariff Act, 1985? *  Whether the transportation of goods by means of hired vehicles such that no consignment note is issued, would fall under the category of Goods Transport Agency Service? *  Whether the applicant is eligible to avail the benefit of exemption from payment of SAD provided under Notification No. 21/2012-Cus. *  Whether the polyester sewing thread manufactured by the appellant is excisable or not. *  INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIAMOND GRADING & RESEARCH INDIA P. LTD. *  Whether grading and inscription of diamonds by the appellant (IIDGR India Private Limited) would amount to manufacture under Central Excise legislation. *  What is the classification when frozen meat is sold in packaged form and rate of tax to be applicable? *  Is the unutilized cenvat credit available before surrender of registration transferable to the new unit? *  Whether Kindle device is covered under Tariff Item 8543 70 99 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or not? *  GST Council considering Kerala government's proposal of 'calamity tax' *  Orissa HC directs authorities not to take action against importers on GST *  Whether the assessee on filing of second appeal before Tribunal is required to make an additional pre-deposit of 10% of the duty and penalty in dispute? *  Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff?  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-17/3442

Whether condonation of delay allowed if appeal wrongly filed under different jurisdiction?
Case:-LATHIA INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES CO. PVT. LTD. VersusCESTAT WEST ZONAL BENCH
Citation:-2016 (342) E.L.T. 535 (Guj.)
Issue:- Whether condonation of delay allowed if appeal wrongly filed under different jurisdiction?
Brief facts:- This petition was filed with following relief :-
“[A] Your Lordships may be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned Order No. A/10806/2014, dated 10-4-2014 passed by the Hon’ble CESTAT, West Zonal Bench, Ahmedabad. Application no. and further be pleased to quash and set aside the Order-in-Appeal No. 185/2012(Ahd-II)CE/AK/Commr(A)/Ahd., dated 30-9-2013 and Order-in-Original No. 9/AC/2012, dated 19-10-2012, passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Division I, Ahmedabad in the interest of justice;”
The brief facts are as under :-
The petitioner-company was engaged in business of manufacture of goods like Rubber Roll, Rubber Blanker, etc. and was availing exemption scheme as a Small Scale Industrial Unit.
The Department alleged that the petitioner-company had wrongly availed Cenvat credit in relation to certain items like Rubber/Ebonite Roll, for which show cause notice dated 9-8-2012 was issued calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why Cenvat credit of Rs. 4,90,159/- be not reversed on account of such wrongful availement. The Deputy Commissioner confirmed the demand in the show cause notice by passing Order-in-Original dated 19-10-2012.
Aggrieved by the Order-in-Original, the petitioner preferred appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals-I) and as there was delay of 64 days, filed a separate application for condonation of delay. The ground for delay as contended by the petitioner was that under a mistake, the appeal came to be filed before a wrong forum of the same Department and when such mistake was realized, the aforementioned delay had occurred.
The Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Excise, Ahmedabad dismissed the application for condonation of delay in view of Section 35 of the Central Excise Act. Such order came to be passed on 30-9-2013.
The petitioner preferred appeal before the CESTAT against order dated 30-9-2013 and CESTAT vide order dated 10-4-2014 rejected the appeal.
 
Appellant’s contention:-Learned Senior Advocate Shri Deven Parikh with learned Advocate Shri Kunal Nanavati for the petitioner submitted that in fact when the appeal came to be filed against the Order-in-Original, there was no delay. However, such appeal was filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) having a different jurisdiction instead of filing such appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Excise, Ahmedabad. Learned Senior Advocate took through the document at Annexure-G which bore the stamp of the appeal having been filed before a different forum and contended that the view taken by the Commissioner (Appeals) as well as CESTAT was hyper-technical in nature and that on merits, the petitioner had an excellent case which required adjudication rather than being scuttled on technical grounds.
 
Respondent’s contention:- Learned Advocate Shri Chintan Dave appearing for the Department had filed an affidavit in the Civil Application to answer this contention of the petitioner. He had also produced xerox copy of the Registers of the concerned Department. Despite this position, the Court had called upon learned Advocate Shri Dave to personally verify the Registers and verify the claim made by the petitioner with regard to filing of the appeal before a wrong forum, to which Shri Dave stated that he had personally verified the Inward Register maintained by the office where according to the petitioner the appeal was initially filed and had confirmed that such appeal was indeed filed before that authority. He therefore urged that he would not seriously object if the matter was remanded back to the stage of Commissioner (Appeals).
 
Reasoning of judgement:-In view of the aforementioned fact situation, on this short ground, the Court was inclined to remain the matter back to the state of appeal to be heard by the Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Excise, Ahmedabad. The Commissioner (Appeals) took into consideration the contentions of the petitioner regarding filing of the appeal in time, but before a different forum in accordance with law. 
Accordingly, the petition was allowed to the aforesaid extent. The matter was remanded back, to be heard by the Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Excise, Ahmedabad. Considering the period that had lapsed, the Commissioner (Appeals) may take up hearing of this case expeditiously. Rule was made absolute. No order as to costs.
In view of the order passed in the main matter, CA does not survive. Disposed of accordingly.
 
Decision:-Petition allowed.
Comment:- The analogy of case was that if delay in filing the appeal occurs due to the fact that the appeal is mistakenly filed before a wrong forum of the same Department and the petitioner corrects the samewhen such mistake is realized, then the application for condonation of delay cannot be dismissed as the appeal cannot be quashed on technical grounds.
 
Prepared by: RAKSHAY TATER
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com