Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case law/2012-13-1554

Whether computerized data processing services are leviable to service tax under BAS?

Case:- TCS E-SERVE LTD. VS COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI-II

Citation:- 2013-TIOL-636-CESTAT-MUMBAI

Issue:- Whether computerized data processing services are leviable to service tax under BAS?
 
Brief Facts:- The appellant are engaged in providing various services India and abroad. They undertook collection and sales services, call center services and computerized data processing services for the client. On the collection and sales services they have been discharging service tax liability under ‘Business Auxiliary Services (BAS)' w.e.f 01/07/2003 and on call center services they have been discharging service tax liability under BAS w.e.f 01/03/2006 as the said service was exempt prior to 01/03/2006. In respect of computerized data processing services, they have been discharging service tax under the category of ‘Business Support Services' w.e.f 01/05/2006 when the said service was brought under tax net. On 20/10/2003 the appellant wrote a letter to the jurisdictional Range Superintendent informing the department of the activities undertaken by them and also conveying that IT services in the nature of computerized data processing services undertaken by them are outside the purview of ‘Business Auxiliary Service'. On 23/10/2008 the department issued a show cause notice for the period July, 2003 to March, 2004 to the appellant with respect to “computerized data processing” undertaken by them proposing to classify the same under ‘Business Auxiliary Services' as defined under section 65(19)(iv) of the Finance Act, 1994 and demanded  towards service tax demand under section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 along with interest thereon apart from proposing penalties under sections 76, 77 and 78 ibid.
 
The notice was adjudicated vide the impugned order and the adjudicating authority came to the conclusion that the appellant's responsibility included collection of documents from the client's customers and, therefore, the nature of the service provided by the appellant is not restricted to computerized data processing and is liable to service tax as the activity undertaken is incidental or ancillary to the customer care service provided by their client to their clients. Accordingly, he confirmed the demand along with interest and also imposed penalties under sections 76, 77 and 78. Aggrieved by the order appellant filed appeal before Tribunal.
 
Appellant’s Contention:- The appellant submit that there is a variation in the allegation made in the show cause notice and in the findings and conclusions drawn by the adjudicating authority with respect to the transactions undertaken by us. While the show cause notice alleged that the appellant's service is ‘computerised data processing' which is incidental or ancillary to the customer care services undertaken by their client to their customers, in the impugned order, a totally different ground has been taken to confirm the demand. The adjudicating authority has concluded that the appellant is collecting raw data from the client's customers which is factually incorrect and which is not the proposition in the show cause notice and, therefore, the basis of which the findings have been given by the adjudicating authority is contrary to the facts and on that ground alone the impugned order is not sustainable in law. The appellant further points out that as per the definition of ‘Business Auxiliary Services' under section 69(19) of the Finance Act, 1994, in the explanation thereof, computerized data processing has been specifically excluded from the scope of BAS. Neither in the show cause notice nor in the impugned order, is there any allegation or finding that the activity undertaken by the appellant is not computerized data processing. If that be so, the question of levy of service tax on the activity undertaken by the appellant, which is nothing but computerized data processing cannot come within the scope of BAS and hence the entire demand is unsustainable.
 
The appellant further points out that w.e.f 01/05/2006 when ‘Business Support Service' was brought under tax net, accounting and processing of transactions and other transaction processing have been specifically included under ‘Business Support Services' (BSS) and explanation to BAS has also been modified so as to exclude computerized data processing services from the said explanation for the reason that the same is included under BSS.
 
The appellant also submits that in the instant case demand is restricted to the period from July 2003 to March, 2004 and there has been no demand for the subsequent period on the very same transaction undertaken by the appellant which also goes to show that the department has accepted the transactions undertaken by the appellant for the subsequent periods under BSS. If that be so, question of classification of the activity of the appellant under BAS would not arise at all.
 
The appellant relies on the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Indian National Ship owners' Association vs. Union of India 2009(14) STR 289 [ 2009-TIOL-150-HCMUM-ST ]wherein it was held that, when a tax is imposed under a new entry with effect from a particular date, it has to be presumed that for the period prior to that date, tax is not leviable unless the new entry has been carved out of earlier existing entry. In the present case, BSS came into force w.e.f 01/05/2006 and it has not been carved out of BAS and hence the demand for the period prior to 01/05/2006 is not sustainable.
 
Respondent’s Contention:- The Respondent reiterates the findings of the adjudicating authority. It is his submission that the conclusion of the Commissioner that the appellant was rendering service incidental or ancillary to customer care service by the bank to their customers is a plausible interpretation and, therefore, sustainable in law. Therefore, he prays for putting the appellant to terms.
 
 
Reasoning of Judgment:-  The Tribunal heard both the parties and carefully considered the rival submissions.
 
The Tribunal finds that the activity undertaken by the appellant in the instant case is, processing of the transactions of their client electronically. In other words, they were undertaking computerized data processing for their client using the computer systems of the client and the clients are located not only in India but all over the world. It is also a fact that the appellant is not interacting with the bank's customers for collection of any data. The data already collected by the bank in their various branches are electronically processed by the appellant. In other words, the appellant is undertaking back-office operations for the client. The Citi Bank group has entrusted the processing of banking transactions electronically to the appellant. Since computerized data processing is specifically excluded from the scope of BAS as per explanation thereof, the question of confirmation of demand under BAS prima facie does not arise. Secondly, it is seen that, bulk of data processing is done for the bank's branches situated abroad. If that be so, the activity undertaken by the appellant would amount to export of service and on that account also no service tax would be payable by the appellant. Thus, we are of the view that the appellant has made out a strong prima facie case in their favour for grant of stay against the impugned order. Accordingly, we grant unconditional waiver from pre-deposit of the dues adjudged against the appellant in the impugned order and stay recovery thereof during the pendency of the appeal.
 
 
Decision:- Pre-deposit waived.
 
Comment:- The crux of this case is that when computerized data processing is specifically excluded from scope of BAS, the question of confirmation of demand under BAS prima facie does not arise and  also, bulk of data processing is done for party which is situated abroad, which would as it is amount to export of service and so no service tax would be payable.
 
 
 
 
 
  
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com