Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2781

Whether Commissioner Appeals has power to condone delay of 1.5 years in filing appeal?

Case:-SARDHA TRAVELS VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX

Citation:-2015(37) S.T.R. 433(Mad.)
 
Brief Facts:-The appellant is engaged in operating staff buses under contracts to M/s. Ives Cotton Limited, Ranipet for pick up and drop of employees in various locations of the factory belonging to the above-said company. The above services provided by the appellant appear to fall under "Tour Operator Service". Since the appellant has not obtained Service Tax registration for the taxable service rendered under the category of "Tour Operators", has not paid the Service Tax and not filed ST returns for the period from 1-4-2004 to 31-5-2009. Therefore show cause notices were issued on 26-9-2009 and 12-11-2009 and the Lower Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand of Service Tax of Rs. 7,39,676/- and Rs. 23,690/- under proviso to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 (34 of 1994 with appropriate interest and penalty.  Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), who, by order, dated 10-4-2012, dismissed the appeal holding that order-in-original was pasted on the premises of the appellant on 6-10-2010, however, the appeal was filed on 7-12-2012, almost after a period of one year and six months, which is beyond the condonable period and hence the appeal is barred by limitation. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant has filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal, on a perusal of the order impugned therein, held that the appeal was filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) almost after one year and six months after the adjudication order was passed. Hence, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant is before this Court raising the substantial questions of law mentioned above.
(i) Whether the appellate tribunal was right in dismissing the appeal due to delay of 32 days has been caused in filling the appeal before the commissioner appeals?
(ii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in dismissing the appeal without considering the plea of limitation?
 
Appellant contentions:- The appellant has raised the following substantial question of law before the hon’ble court:-
"1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in dismissing the appeal when only there is a delay of 32 days has been caused in filing the appeal before the Com-missioner Appeals?
2. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in dismissing the appeal without considering the plea of limitation?"

Respondent contentions:-Mr. T. Chandrasekaran learned Standing Counsel enterer appearance for the first respondent and filed a counter affidavit, wherein it was stated that the appeal was not filed in time before the Commissioner (Appeals) and therefore the present appeal is not maintainable.

Reasoning of Judgment:-On a perusal of the records, it is seen that the order-in-original was pasted on the premises of the appellant on 6-10-2010 under a Mahazar before twoindependent witnesses as required under Section 37C(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, since the appellant was not available in the premises and the premise was also locked. That is the effective date of service. However, the appellant construed as if the order was affixed only on 6-10-2011 and filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) along with a petition to condone the delay of 32 days. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) held that the date of service of summon was only 6-10-2010 and not 6-10-2011 and dismissed the appeal. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court reported in 2008 (221) E.L.T. 163 (S.C.) (Singh Enterprises v. CCE, Jamshedpur), which is followed by this Court in the decision reported in 2013-TIOL-168 HC-Mad = 2013 (32) S.T.R. 172 (Mad.) (M/s. Gopinath and Sharma v. CESTAT) and dismissed the appeal on the proposition that the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot condone the delay beyond the stipulated period.  In the light of the above, the hon’ble are in full agreement with the above cited decisions and therefore, not inclined to entertain this appeal and accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed and the order of the Tribunal stands confirmed. No costs.

Decision:-Appeal dismissed.  

Comment:-The analogy of the case is that date when the order-in-original was pasted on the premises of the appellantis the effective date of service because the premises was locked. Consequently, there was delay of 1.5 years in filing appeal by the assessee from the date of pasting of order in original which was beyond the condonable powers of the Commissioner Appeals. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed due to delayed filing.

Prepared By:- Anash Kachaliya

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com