Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2016-17/3054

whether carpentry activities falls under the ambit of “interior decorator” ?
Case:-DIVEKAR ASSOCIATES Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE-III
 
Citation:-2015 (40) S.T.R. 1101 (Tri. - Mumbai)
 
Issue:-whether carpentry activities falls under the ambit of “interior decorator” ?
 
Brief Facts:-The relevant facts that arise for consideration are during the period 1999-2003 it was alleged that the appellant undertook various activities like carpentry work involving different types of furniture items, modular partitions, fixation of false ceiling, painting of walls and ceilings, etc., which falls under the ambit of “interior decorator” under Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994 and having not discharged the service tax liability, show cause notice was issued by invoking the extended period. Appellant contested the show cause notice on merits. The adjudicating authority after following due process of law held that the appellant is liable to pay the service tax hence confirmed the demands with interest and also imposed penalties. Aggrieved by such an order, an appeal was preferred before the first appellate authority. The first appellate authority also concurred with the view of the adjudicating authority and rejected the appeal filed by the appellant.
 
Appellant’s Contention:-Learned counsel draws the attention to the allegation made in the show cause notice and the findings recorded by the adjudicating authority as well as first appellate authority. They would submit that both the authorities have categorically recorded that the appellants are engaged in the business of manufacturing of furniture as per the design and drawing specifically provided by the client. It is their submission that the said activity of the appellant could not fall under Section 65(59) of the Finance Act, 1994 which defines that “interior decorator services”. They would submit that the activity undertaken by the appellant would fall under the category of ‘Erection, Commissioning or Installation Services” or under “Commissioning or Installation Service” which came into service tax net from 16th June, 2005. It is their submission that identical issue came up before the Tribunal in the case of Spandrel v. CCE, Hyderabad/Kochi - 2010 (20)S.T.R.129 (Tri.-Bang.) wherein the Bench held in favour of the appellant therein. They produces a copy of the said judgment. They would also submit that this view of the Bench was followed by the Tribunal in the case of Space Decorators v. CCE, Pune-III - 2012 (26)S.T.R.346 (Tri.-Mumbai) and held that the activities could not fall under the category of “interior decorator”.
 
Respondent’s Contention:- Learned D.R. on the other hand would submit that the activity undertaken by the appellant would fall under the services of “interior decorator” as they were engaged indirectly in the business of providing technical assistance or any other manner related to planning, design or beautification of spaces. Their submission is that the appellant was enhancing the interior of the flat where they undertook the work of modular partition. It is their submission that the appellant in his statement stated that they are undertaking the activity of fixation of modular partitions, which would definitely fall under the category of “interior decorator”.
 
Reasoning of judgement:- They have considered the submissions made by both sides and perused the records.
They need to go through the definition as amended, in Section 65(59) of Finance Act, 1994 : -
“Clause (59) of Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994 defines ‘interior decorators’ as -
“ ‘interior decorators’ means any person engaged whether directly or indirectly in the business of providing by way of advice, consultancy, technical assistance or in any other manner, services related to planning, design or beautification of space whether man-made or otherwise and includes a landscape designer”.
It can be seen from the above reproduced definition, the activities which are undertaken by the appellant are not falling under the category of “interior decorator services”. They find strong force in the submissions made by the learned advocate that the issue is finally settled by the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Spandrel (supra) (in which one of us was a Member). They reproduce the relevant paragraphs : -
“7. The term ‘Commissioning or Installation’ has been defined under Section 65(39a) of the Act, as : -
(i)         Erection, commissioning or installation of Plant (Machinery Equipment or Structures whether fabricated or otherwise); or
(ii)        Installation of -
(a)        electrical and electronic devices including wiring or fitting therefor; or
(b)        plumbing, drain laying or other installations for transport of fluids; or
(c)        heating, ventilation or air-conditioning including related pipe, work, duct work and sheet metal work; or
(d)        thermal insulation, sound insulation, fire proofing or water proofing; or
(e)        lift and escalator, fire escape staircases or travelators; or
(f)         such other similar services;
The various kinds of work include carpentry work involving execution of different types of furniture, modular partitions fixation of false ceiling painting of walls and ceiling and all these activities are carried out under the control and supervision of the appellant as per the agreement/contracts entered into. These facts have been admitted by Shri Divekar i.e. the appellant in his statement recorded under Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The service provided by the appellant is related to planning, designing and beautification of space.”
In view of the foregoing and the facts and circumstances of this case as also the judicial pronouncement, they hold the impugned order is unsustainable and liable to be set aside and they do so.
 
Decision:-Impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with consequential relief.
 
Comment:- In the present case the assessee was engaged in manufacturing of furniture as per design, drawing and specification provided by client and also undertaking work of modular partition. Tribunal held that the activities will be covered under the “Commissioning or Installation” Services.
 
Submitted By:- Somya Jain
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com