Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2020-2021/3572

Whether carbonated fruit juices fall under Fruit Juices or aerated drinks?
Rich Dairy Products (India) Private Limited Order No. 41/AAR/2019 dated 23.09.2019
Brief Facts:M/s. Rich Dairy Product (India) Private Limited is engaged manufacturing of fruit juices and also carbonated fruit juices. The applicant is using input of carbonated water is around 92.5% and lime juice/lime juice concentrate is 2.5% and Orange juice is 5% for manufacturing of carbonated fruit juices. The applicant is selling in the above product in sealed bottle and same is marketed as “Carbonated Beverage with Fruit Juice”.
Issue:  Whether carbonated fruit juices fall under Fruit Juices or aerated drinks?
Applicant’s contention:The contention of applicant is that they stated that as per FSSAI regulation of 2016, their products are ‘carbonated fruit based drinks’ to be classified under HSN 22029020, taxable at 12% GST.
The applicant has stated that the GST rate @28% and Cess @12 % are applicable only for the goods with description as all goods including Aerated water containing added sugar or other sweetening materials or flavoured. Hence nowhere fruit juices are mentioned.
 Their product Carbonated fruit juices do not fall under the above description of Aerated water containing added sugar or sweetening materials. Also Nowhere the percentage of fruit juices content are given for determination of tax rates whether falls under 28% or 12%.
In a similar issue during the VAT regime, the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of ‘Appy Fizz’ has given verdict saying that Appy Fizz belongs to fruit juices only and therefore KVAT @ 20% could not be demanded and since fruit juices were involved it can be taxed @ KVAT 12%. The judgment was given to Kerala Sales tax offices.
 The Government of India- Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has also issued necessary amendment that if the quantity of fruit juice in the beverage is below 10%, but not less than 5% (2.5% in case of lime or lemon), the product shall be called carbonated beverage with fruit juice. Hence it is carbonated beverages with fruit juices only.
Concentrate of fruit juices content in the carbonated fruit juices manufactured by them is as follows-Lemon juice-2.5% as per FSSAI norms; other juice- 5% as per FSSAI Norms
Respondent’s contention and reasoning:The advance ruling argued that content of lime juice and orange juice for manufacturing of “Carbonated Beverage with Fruit Juice” is under parameter of 3A of FSSAI regulation 2.3.30 and also satisfies the categorization under 14.1.4.1. Hence, the said product cannot be classified as “Aerated Water” under chapter heading 22021010. The product will be classified either under chapter 22021020 or 22021090 on depending on flavors. The GST is applicable @ 28% on the said product under GST Regime.
The Applicant has relied on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in classification of ‘APPY FIZZ’ in case of M/s Parle Agro Ltd vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Trivandrum in the VAT regime. However, that ruling is not relevant here as the products are different and that ruling was based on the classification as per the Kerala VAT notifications. Under GST, classifications is based on First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
The fruit juices are extracted from fresh, healthy and ripe fruits through various processes followed by filtration to remove solids, aeration, homogenization and sterlisation. Such fruit juices to be classified under CTH 2009 can have added sugar, standardizing agent, preservatives as long as they retain their original character. However, addition of water to normal fruit juice or to a concentrated juice of a greater quantity of water than is necessary to reconstitute the original fruit juice results in diluted products excludes such products from CTH 2009 and are to be classified as beverages of heading 2202 – In the instant case, water constitutes around 92% in all the products in question. The product is prepared by adding fruit juice, procured by the applicant (as per the input invoices submitted), to filter water. It is evident that this large quantity of water results in diluted products which as per the Explanatory Notes above get classified under CTH 2202.
Waters, including mineral waters and aerated waters, containing added sugar or other sweetening matter or flavoured, and Other Non-alcoholic beverages, not including fruit or vegetable juices of Heading 2009’ are covered under CTH 2202. Further, The Explanatory Notes classifies Waters, including mineral waters and aerated waters, containing added sugar or other sweetening matter or flavoured’ under CTH 220210 – In the case at hand, the manufacturing process of the products involves addition of fruit juice (Lime/ Orange), sugar, ingredients, flavours to filtered water in a blending tank, which is chilled at 5°C in the Chilling Tank and then passed through Juice& CO2 Mixing Unit after which the same is bottled for supply in various quantities such as 200 ml, 300 ml, 600 ml, 1500 ml, etc. and are sold as ‘Carbonated Beverage with fruit juice’. These beverages fall squarely under the category mentioned in the Para (A) (2) of the Explanatory Notes above. That is they are classifiable under CTH 220210.
The products to be supplied by the applicant are to be classified as ‘Richyaa Darner Lemon’ and ‘Licta Lemon’ are classifiable under CTH 22021020 and all others i.e. ‘Richyaa Darner Cola’, ‘Licta Cola’, ‘Richyaa Darner Jeera Soda’, ‘Licta Jeera Masala, ‘Richyaa Darner Orange’ and ‘Licta Orange’ are classifiable as ‘Other’ under CTH 22021090.
Comment: AAAR also upheld the order of AAR vide Order in Appeal No. AAAR/01/2020 (AR) dated 10.02.2020
Prepared : Vijay
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com