Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2020-2021/3572

Whether carbonated fruit juices fall under Fruit Juices or aerated drinks?
Rich Dairy Products (India) Private Limited Order No. 41/AAR/2019 dated 23.09.2019
Brief Facts:M/s. Rich Dairy Product (India) Private Limited is engaged manufacturing of fruit juices and also carbonated fruit juices. The applicant is using input of carbonated water is around 92.5% and lime juice/lime juice concentrate is 2.5% and Orange juice is 5% for manufacturing of carbonated fruit juices. The applicant is selling in the above product in sealed bottle and same is marketed as “Carbonated Beverage with Fruit Juice”.
Issue:  Whether carbonated fruit juices fall under Fruit Juices or aerated drinks?
Applicant’s contention:The contention of applicant is that they stated that as per FSSAI regulation of 2016, their products are ‘carbonated fruit based drinks’ to be classified under HSN 22029020, taxable at 12% GST.
The applicant has stated that the GST rate @28% and Cess @12 % are applicable only for the goods with description as all goods including Aerated water containing added sugar or other sweetening materials or flavoured. Hence nowhere fruit juices are mentioned.
 Their product Carbonated fruit juices do not fall under the above description of Aerated water containing added sugar or sweetening materials. Also Nowhere the percentage of fruit juices content are given for determination of tax rates whether falls under 28% or 12%.
In a similar issue during the VAT regime, the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of ‘Appy Fizz’ has given verdict saying that Appy Fizz belongs to fruit juices only and therefore KVAT @ 20% could not be demanded and since fruit juices were involved it can be taxed @ KVAT 12%. The judgment was given to Kerala Sales tax offices.
 The Government of India- Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has also issued necessary amendment that if the quantity of fruit juice in the beverage is below 10%, but not less than 5% (2.5% in case of lime or lemon), the product shall be called carbonated beverage with fruit juice. Hence it is carbonated beverages with fruit juices only.
Concentrate of fruit juices content in the carbonated fruit juices manufactured by them is as follows-Lemon juice-2.5% as per FSSAI norms; other juice- 5% as per FSSAI Norms
Respondent’s contention and reasoning:The advance ruling argued that content of lime juice and orange juice for manufacturing of “Carbonated Beverage with Fruit Juice” is under parameter of 3A of FSSAI regulation 2.3.30 and also satisfies the categorization under 14.1.4.1. Hence, the said product cannot be classified as “Aerated Water” under chapter heading 22021010. The product will be classified either under chapter 22021020 or 22021090 on depending on flavors. The GST is applicable @ 28% on the said product under GST Regime.
The Applicant has relied on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in classification of ‘APPY FIZZ’ in case of M/s Parle Agro Ltd vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Trivandrum in the VAT regime. However, that ruling is not relevant here as the products are different and that ruling was based on the classification as per the Kerala VAT notifications. Under GST, classifications is based on First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
The fruit juices are extracted from fresh, healthy and ripe fruits through various processes followed by filtration to remove solids, aeration, homogenization and sterlisation. Such fruit juices to be classified under CTH 2009 can have added sugar, standardizing agent, preservatives as long as they retain their original character. However, addition of water to normal fruit juice or to a concentrated juice of a greater quantity of water than is necessary to reconstitute the original fruit juice results in diluted products excludes such products from CTH 2009 and are to be classified as beverages of heading 2202 – In the instant case, water constitutes around 92% in all the products in question. The product is prepared by adding fruit juice, procured by the applicant (as per the input invoices submitted), to filter water. It is evident that this large quantity of water results in diluted products which as per the Explanatory Notes above get classified under CTH 2202.
Waters, including mineral waters and aerated waters, containing added sugar or other sweetening matter or flavoured, and Other Non-alcoholic beverages, not including fruit or vegetable juices of Heading 2009’ are covered under CTH 2202. Further, The Explanatory Notes classifies Waters, including mineral waters and aerated waters, containing added sugar or other sweetening matter or flavoured’ under CTH 220210 – In the case at hand, the manufacturing process of the products involves addition of fruit juice (Lime/ Orange), sugar, ingredients, flavours to filtered water in a blending tank, which is chilled at 5°C in the Chilling Tank and then passed through Juice& CO2 Mixing Unit after which the same is bottled for supply in various quantities such as 200 ml, 300 ml, 600 ml, 1500 ml, etc. and are sold as ‘Carbonated Beverage with fruit juice’. These beverages fall squarely under the category mentioned in the Para (A) (2) of the Explanatory Notes above. That is they are classifiable under CTH 220210.
The products to be supplied by the applicant are to be classified as ‘Richyaa Darner Lemon’ and ‘Licta Lemon’ are classifiable under CTH 22021020 and all others i.e. ‘Richyaa Darner Cola’, ‘Licta Cola’, ‘Richyaa Darner Jeera Soda’, ‘Licta Jeera Masala, ‘Richyaa Darner Orange’ and ‘Licta Orange’ are classifiable as ‘Other’ under CTH 22021090.
Comment: AAAR also upheld the order of AAR vide Order in Appeal No. AAAR/01/2020 (AR) dated 10.02.2020
Prepared : Vijay
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com