Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2014-15/2453

Whether CA certificate sufficient to prove that there is no unjust enrichment?

Case:- KHETALAL RATANSI PATEL VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR
 
Citation:- 2014 (308) E.L.T. 689 (Tri. - Mumbai)

 
Brief facts:- The appellants filed these appeals against the impugned orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the adjudication orders rejecting the refund claim filed by the appellants.
The brief facts of the case are that the appellants made import of teak round logs and paid appropriate duty including 4% special additional duty of customs. Subsequently the appellants sold the goods to different buyers on payment of appropriate VAT. Thereafter the appellant filed a refund claim in view of the provisions of Notification No. 102/2007-Cus., dated 14-9-2007. The adjudicating authority allowed the refund claim, however credited the amounts to the Consumer Welfare Fund on the ground that the appellant failed to show that burden of duty has not been passed on. The adjudication is upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals).
 
Appellant’s contention:- The learned counsel submitted that the appellant had fulfilled all the conditions of the Notification and the goods were cleared under the invoices where specifically it has been mentioned that no credit of additional duty of customs is available. The appellant also submitted that the Board has clarified vide Circular No. 16/2008-Cus., dated 13-10-2008 that a certificate by the Chartered Accountant is required to show that incidence of duty burden has not been passed on by the importer to any other person for the purpose of refund of 4% CVD. The appellant produced necessary C.A. certificate along with cost sheet hence the impugned orders are not sustainable.
 
Respondent’s contention:- The Revenue relied upon the findings of the lower authority and submitted that the appellant failed to show that burden of duty has not been passed on hence the refund claim was rightly rejected.
 
Reasoning of judgment:- In the present case, the refund claim is filed under the provisions of Notification 102/2007-Cus., dated 14-9-2007. For ready reference, the provisions of the Notification are reproduced below:-
“Exemption from special CVD to all goods imported for subsequent sale when VAT/Sales Tax paid by importer. - In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts the goods falling within the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), when imported into India for subsequent sale, from the whole of the additional duty of customs leviable thereon under sub-section (5) of Section 3 of the said Customs Tariff Act (hereinafter referred to as the said additional duty).
2.The exemption contained in this notification shall be given effect if the following conditions are fulfilled :
(a)    the importer of the said goods shall pay all duties, including the said additional duty of customs leviable thereon, as applicable, at the time of importation of the goods;
(b)    the importer, while issuing the invoice for sale of the said goods, shall specifically indicate in the invoice that in respect of the goods covered therein, no credit of the additional duty of customs levied under sub-section (5) of Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 shall be admissible;
(c)    the importer shall file a claim for refund of the said additional duty of customs paid on the imported goods with the jurisdictional customs officer before the expiry of one year from the date of payment of the said additional duty of customs;
(d)    the importer shall pay on sale of the said goods, appropriate sales tax or value added tax, as the case may be;
(e)    the importer shall, inter alia, provide copies of the following documents along with the refund claim :
(i)     document evidencing payment of the said additional duty;
(ii)    invoices of sale of the imported goods in respect of which refund of the said additional duty is claimed;
(iii)   documents evidencing payment of appropriate sales tax or value added tax, as the case may be, by the importer, on sale of such imported goods.
3.The jurisdictional customs officer shall sanction the refund on satisfying himself that the conditions referred to in para 2 above, are fulfilled.”
The refund claim is rejected on the ground that the appellant failed to show that burden of duty has not been passed on. The appellant produced necessary C.A. certificate along with cost sheet as required under Circular No. 16/2008-Cus., dated 13-10-2008. The appellant has also specifically written on the invoices under which the goods were sold, that the credit of additional duty of customs is not available. The C.A. certificate specifically shows that the amount of refund is shown in the account books as amount due as a refund of additional customs duty. In view of this, the Hon’ble Court found merit in the contention of the appellant. The impugned orders are set aside and the appeals are allowed.
 
Decision:- Appeal allowed.
 
Comment:-The analogy of the case is that as the assessee had produced the necessary C.A. certificate along with the cost sheet as required under the clarificatory C.B.E. & C. Circular No. 16/2008-Cus., dated 13-10-2008 and the C.A. certificate showed that amount of SAD refund was shown in account books as ‘amount due’ as a refund of Additional Customs Duty, the bar of unjust enrichment was not applicable. Moreover, the assessee has also specified in invoices that the credit of additional duty of customs in not available. Therefore, when all the conditions have been satisfied, the refund of SAD was allowed.
 
Prepared by:- Monika Tak

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com