Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2014-15/2157

Whether bus reservation charges taxable under tour operator services?

Case:-CHOUDHARY YATRA CO PVT LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS
 
Citation:-2014-TIOL-401-CESTAT-MUM
 
Brief facts:- Thematerial facts of this case are thatthis appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No: IPL/252/NSK/2008 dated 31/12/2008 passedby the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Nasik. Vide the impugned order the learned appellate authority has upheld the order dated 27/05/2008passed by the Joint Commissioner of Central Excise, Nasik wherein the activity undertaken by theappellant has been classified under ‘tour operator service' and service tax demand ofRs.11,77,681/- has been confirmed against the appellant for the period 01/04/2006 to 31/05/2007along with interest thereon. In addition, penalty has been imposed on the appellant underSections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. Aggrieved of the same the appellant is before the bench.
 
When the case was called, an application for adjournment was filed on behalf of theappellant on the ground that the Director of the company is on urgent business tour. It was noticed that the said case has come up on earlier occasions, i.e. on 16/07/2009, 02/09/2009, and 25/11/2013and on all these occasions the appellant sought adjournment. This is the fourth occasion theappeal is coming up for hearing and therefore, not inclined to consider the adjournmentrequest. Therefore, with the assistance of the Departmental Representative, theappeal was taken up for consideration and disposal.The appellant undertakes tours to various places and they entered into agreements withvarious parties and for the services rendered they are collecting amounts under the heads ‘BusReservation Agreement', ‘Seat Reservation Agreement', Nasik Darshan', and ‘Tour Extension'. Theyare discharging service on the charges received for seat reservation, Nasik Darshan and TourExtension. However, no service tax liability is discharged on the consideration received for ‘BusReservation'. Accordingly, a show cause notice dated 11/10/2007 was issued to the appellantdemanding service tax on the charges received towards bus reservation for the period 01/04/2006to 31/05/2007 and the same was adjudicated vide order dated 30/04/2008 by classifying theservices rendered by the appellant as ‘Tour Operator Service'.
 
Appellant’s contention:-The appellant's contention is thatthe services rendered by them would come under the category of Rent-a-Cab Operator and theyare discharging service tax on the said activity w.e.f. 01/06/2007 onwards and, therefore, for theperiod prior to 01/06/2007, the said services cannot be classified as tour operator services andthey have placed reliance on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Gujarat Chemical PortTerminal Co. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs 2008 (9) STR 386 (2007-TIOL-1898-CESTAT-AHM) and Diebold Systems (P) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai 2008 (9)STR 546 (2008-TIOL-489-CESTAT-MAD). Therefore, it is the appellant's contention that the activityundertaken falls under ‘Rent-a-Cab Services' and not under ‘Tour Operator Service'.
 
Respondent’s contention:-The learned Additional Commissioner (AR) appearing for the Revenue, on the other hand,submits that the appellant is discharging service under ‘tour operator services' in respect of seatreservation and tour extension services undertaken by them but only on the component of busreservation charges collected by the appellant, they are not discharging service tax liability. Theentire activity is a single activity and, therefore, the said activity cannot be divided andsegregated and service tax liability discharged only on the part of service rendered of seatreservation and tour extension by contending that bus reservation falls under a different categoryaltogether. Therefore, he justifies the impugned order and prays that the appeal be dismissed.
 
Reasoning of judgment:-The bench carefully considered the submissions made in the appeal memorandum and also thecontentions raised by the Revenue. They also perused the bus reservation agreement dated17/10/2007 available on record entered into by the appellant with the Principal, Rangubai JunnarePrimary School. The said agreement is for booking of the buses for the tours undertaken to Nasik,Ellora, Ghrisneshwar, Siddharth Garden, etc. and the tour starts at 5.00 a.m. on 22/11/2007 andconcludes at 7.00 p.m. on 23/22/2007. Thus, the bus reservation is for conduct of the tours andtherefore, it forms rightly part of the tour operator services as defined in law.
They found that in appellant's own case, for the previous period, this Tribunal had examined thisissue and held that the appellant would be liable to discharge service tax liability on the busreservation agreement under the category of tour operator services w.e.f. 10/09/2004.(2012-TIOL-1207-CESTAT-MUM).
 
In view of the above no merit was found in the appeal filed by the appellant andtherefore, they upheld the confirmation of service tax demand on the ‘bus reservation charges'collected by the appellant under the category of tour operator service. Consequently, the liabilityto pay interest on the confirmed service tax demand is also sustained.
 
As regards the penalties imposed, two penalties had been imposed, one underSection 76 and another under Section 78. Section 76 penalty is imposable if there is a delay ordefault in payment of service tax and no mens rea is required to be proved. However, impositionof penalty under Section 78 is for suppression of facts, collusion, fraud etc. In this particularcase, since the activity has been in dispute since 2004, the department cannot allege suppressionor willful mis-statement of facts. Therefore, the penalty under Section 78 is neither justified norwarranted in the circumstances of the case. Accordingly, we set aside the penalty imposed underSection 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.
 
But for the above modification, the order of the lower appellate authority is upheld and theAppeal dismissed.
 
Decision:-Appeal dismissed.

Comment:-The essence of this case is that the bus reservation charges collected in view of the tour conducted are incidental to the main service provided of the tour operator and shall be taxable under tour operator service only. The incidental services cannot be separately classified under “Rent-a-cab Service” because it is essential part of the tour operator services.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com