Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2013-14/1610

Whether BSS like roads, parking, security gate falls within the ambit of input services?

Case:- COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-III Vs M/s MINDA ACOUSTICS LTD
 
Citation:-2013-TIOL-894-CESTAT-DEL
 
Brief facts:-  All the appeals filed by the Revenue and by the appellant are being disposed of by a common order as they arise but of the same impugned order of Commissioner (Appeals). However, for the sake of brevity, facts as available in the assessee appeal are being adverted too. The appellant is a 100% EOU engaged in the manufacture of Sound Signalling equipments. The dispute in the present appeal relates to the Cenvat credit availed by the appellant in respect of various services. It is seen that original by a show cause notice was issued for disallowing the Cenvat credit on various inputs services like CHA service, courier service, catering service, medical claim insurance, rent a cab and general insurance and business support service and denial of Cenvat credit of Rs. 12,66,562/- was confirmed by the Additional Commissioner along with imposition of penalty of Rs. 3,50,00/- On appeal against the said order, the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the credit in respect of various services but denied the same in respect of business support service to the extent of Rs. 10,59,538/-. The said denial is challenged by the appellant, whereas allowing of the Cenvat credit stand challenged by the Revenue. The appellant was availing the business support service (support service for business and commerce) such as security, cleaning and housekeeping, canteen, reception, maintenance of common areas i.e. roads, parking, security gate and running and maintenance of common facilities like ETP, STP, EPBX, WTP, DG sets, air compressors, chilling plant. For the said purposes, they have entered into an agreement with M/s Minda Acoustics Ltd. on 1/5/06 for the purpose of providing the above business support services. The Revenue has denied the credit on the ground that they cannot be held to be admissible cenvatable input services.
 
Appellant’s contention:- The appellant contended that services like security, cleaning and housekeeping , canteen, reception, maintenance of common areas i.e. roads, parking, security gate and running and maintenance of common facilities like ETP, STP, EPBX, WTP, DG sets, air compressors, chilling plant do not fall in ambit of input service definition thus credit won’t be allowed.
 
Reasoning of Judgement:   The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CCE, Nagpur vs. Ultratech Cement Ltd. reported in 2010 (20) S.T.R. 577 (Bom.), that the criteria for coverage of input services is that the same is integrally connected with business of manufacture of final product and the scope of the definition being very wide, the same would cover services not only used directly or indirectly in or in relation to the manufacture of final products, but also various services used in relation to business of manufacture, whether prior to manufacture or after manufacture. The definition of input service seeks to cover every conceivable service used in business of manufacture. Similarly, in the case of Coca Cola India Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, Pune - III reported in 2009 (15) S.T.R. 657 (Bom.), it stands held that the term business appearing in the definition of input service cannot be given a restricted definition in as much as the said term is of wide import and covers all the activities related to functioning of a business. By applying the ratio of the above decision to the facts of the instant case, it was found that the business support services being provided by M/s Minda Acoustics Ltd. are relatable to the business activities of the appellant and are squarely covered by the definition of input services. Also it as found that no merits in the Revenue's contention that the same are not directly related to manufacture of their final products. Thus appeal was dismissed.
 
Decision:- Appeal was dismissed.
 
Comment:-The analogy drawn from this case is that the definition of input service cannot be given a restricted definition in as much as the said term is of wide import and covers all the activities related to functioning of a business.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com