Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/ Case Law/2013-14/1619

Whether benefit of Notification can be denied on premise that person entering into high sea sales agreement is not importer?

Case:- M/s APCA POWER PVT LTD, M/s PHOTON ENERGY SYSTEMS LTD, M/s MEGHA ENGINEERING & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, KANDLA

Citation:- 2013-TIOL-912-CESTAT-AHM

Brief facts:- The appellant has engaged in various unwanted agreements of high sea sales and wants to claim benefit of Notification no. 01/2011 Cus. The appellant has imported goods which are eligible for the exemption under Notification no. 01/2011-cus. But the Revenue had argued that the appellant had entered into unwanted high sea sale and can not be said an importer. Thus, goods were confiscated and raised demand of the amount involved. Consequently, the appellant had filed stay petition for the waiver of pre-deposit of demand and argued that since, appellant has been issued certificate by Govt. of India, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy recommending grant of exemption, the benefit of the notification cannot be denied.
 
Appellants contention:- The appellant submits that the conditions of Notification No.1/2011-Cus. have been complied with. The appellant had filed Bill of Entry along with certificate issued by the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy to the Custom authorities. In order to avail the benefit of the said Notification, goods imported must be used for initial setting of solar power generation project or facility. The appellant had also produced various documents relating to purchase order raised by M/s Megha Engineering & Infrastructure Ltd. for the supply of consignment in question and submit that the said order placed on M/s Solar World Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. It is submitted by the appellant that a person who is engaged in High sea sales is a person holding himself out to be the owner and covered within the definition of Importer u/s 2(26) of Customs Act, 1962.

The appellant had also drew attention to the judgment of this Tribunal in the case of Gujarat Adani Port Ltd - 2013 (287) ELT 330 (Tri- Ahmd ) to submit that such a proposition is upheld by Tribunal.
 
Respondents Contention:- The respondent, on the other hand, submits that the original contract was entered by M/s APCA Power Pvt. Ltd. with M/s Photon Energy Systems Ltd and M/s Megha Engineering & Infrastructure Ltd. It is his submission the appellant has not owned the goods which were imported and has filed Bill of Entry and hence cannot be considered as owner for import. He would submit that the entire contract entered by M/s Megha Engg . & Infrastructure Ltd and M/s Photon Energy Systems Ltd would indicate that there was something wrong and the appellant, having not paid for the goods, cannot be held as importer. It is his submission that the findings of the adjudicating authority are very clear in as much as the officials of all the 3 units viz. M/s APCA Power Pvt. Ltd. with M/s Photon Energy Systems Ltd and M/s Megha Engineering & Infrastructure Ltd. have accepted that the agreement was only for the purpose of documenting the sale of goods before the goods land in India.
 
Reasoning of Judgement:- On careful consideration of the submissions made by both sides and perusal of the records, the hon’ble CESTAT found that the issue involved in this case is regarding the differential duty of Customs which has been confirmed by the adjudicating authority by denying the benefit of Notification No.1/2011-Cus. The CESTAT found that there is no dispute as to the fact that the goods which were imported, benefit of Notification No.1/2011-Cus, was claimed in respect of solar power generation project or facility for solar energy plant to be set up in Gujarat. It is also undisputed that M/s APCA Power Pvt. Ltd. was project promoter/ developer and has applied for said certificate with Govt. of India Ministry of New and Renewable Energy. Their application was entertained by Govt. of India Ministry of New and Renewable Energy and approximate certificate was issued to them extending the benefit of Notification No.1/2011-Cus, which accept and acknowledges the fact that the goods are needed for solar power generation project or facility. If that be the case, the benefit of Notification No.1/2011-Cus, cannot be denied to such goods.
 
Yet another angle to the entire issue is whether the appellant M/s APCA Power Pvt. Ltd., having filed Bill of Entry, can be considered as an importer or not. The Hon’ble CESTAT found that the definition of 'importer' under Section 2(26) of reads as under:

"'Importer', in relation to any goods at any time between their importation and the time when they are cleared for home consumption, includes any owner or any person holding himself out to be the importer"

It can be seen from the above definition that the appellant can be considered as a person who is holding himself out to be an importer, even if all the arguments of the Revenue are accepted that the appellant has entered into various unwanted agreements of high sea sale.

In his view, the appellant has made out a strong prima facie case for pre-deposit of the amount of duty, interest thereof and the penalty imposed. It was found that the first appellate authority has confiscated the goods holding them as liable for confiscation. Thus, the goods are prima facie eligible for benefit of Notification No.1/2011-Cus, and the confiscation ordered by the adjudicating authority is, prima facie, erroneous.
 
Decision:- The stay application is allowed.
 
Comment:- The gist of the above case is that entering into high sea sale does not mean that person is not covered within the definition of importer so as to deny him the benefit of the exemption notification.
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com