Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2018-2019/3464

Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff?
Case:AOS SYSTEMS VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI
Citation:2018 (13) G.S.T.L. 167 (Tri. - Del.)
Issue:Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff?
Brief facts: The appeal is against the Order-in-Appeal No. 24/2016, dated 27-3-2017. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems. All three products are hand free plumbing products, which are normally used in public toilets. In the case of Automatic Tap, when the hands of the user break the infrared beams, the device is activated and the flow of water commences. In the case of Automatic Urinal and WC Flushing Systems, the system gets activated when the person moves away and flushing happens. The appellant classified the products under CETH 8543 90, since they commenced manufacture in 1998. In the budget of 2014, a concessional rate of duty of 10 per cent was prescribed for the goods falling under Chapter 84 and 85. This exemption notification remained in force from 17-2-2014 of 31-2-2014. The Department was of the view that the appellant had wrongly classified the product under 8543 90 and cleared the same by paying duty at the rate of 10 per cent. The Original Authority vide his order dated 31-12-2015 ordered classification of all the three products under CETH 9032 89 10 and held them as liable to duty at 12 per cent as against the concessional rate of 10 per cent. However, the Commissioner (Appeals), in the impugned order, ordered classification of the Automatic Taps under CETH 8481 and the other two products under CETH 9032. Aggrieved by the impugned order the present appeal has been filed, in which the appellant has claimed the classification of all the products under CETH 8481.
 
Appellant’s contention:Applicant submits that the there is no material difference between the three products for the purpose of classification. He cited the ruling of US Customs to justify the classification of all the products under 8481.
 
Respondent’s Contention:The Ld. DR on the other hand, justified the impugned order. He referred to the leaflet of the products manufactured by the appellant and argued that the classification ordered by the Commissioner (Appeals) is correct.

Reasoning of Judgement: We have heard both sides and perused the records. The three products manufactured by the appellant are:-
(i)    The Automatic Water Tap :-
This is a water tap in which a sensor is located which controls flow automatically, once a hand is placed or removed near the tap.
(ii)   Automatic Flushing System for urinal;
(iii)  Automatic Flushing System for WC.
In respect of the items at (ii), (iii) the appellant manufactures only the electronic device which is operated through batteries and mounted on the water lines and placed on the wall. After someone uses the urinal/WC and moves away, the sensor in the system operates the flow of water and cleans urinal/WC. It is to be noted that the electronic device manufactured by the appellant does not come fitted on any WC or Urinal. The competing CETH, 8481 as well as 9032 are copied below for ready reference.
8481 Taps cocks, valves and similar appliances for pips, boiler shells, tanks, vas or the like, including pressure - reducing valves and thermostatically controlled valves.
8481 10 00 Pressure - reducing valves
8481 20 00 Valves for oleo hydraulic or pneumatic transmission
8481 30 00 Check non-return valves
8481 40 00 Safety or relief valves
8481 80 Other appliances
8481 80 10 Taps, cooks and similar appliances of iron or steel
8481 80 20 Taps, cooks and similar appliances of non-ferrous, metal
8481 80 30 Industrial valves (excluding pressure-reducing valves, and thermostatically controlled valves).
  Inner tube valves
8481 80 41 For bicycles
8481 80 49 Other
8481 80 50 Expansion valves and solenoid valves for refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery
8481 80 90 Other
8481 90 Parts
8481 90 10 Bicycle valves
8481 90 90 Other
 
CETH 9032 :- Automatic regulating or controlling instruments and apparatus.
9032 Automatic regulation or controlling instruments and apparatus
9032 10 Thermostats
9032 10 10 For refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery
9032 10 90 Other
9032 20 Manos tats
9032 20 10 For refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery
9032 20 90 Other
  Other instruments and apparatus
9032 81 00 Hydraulic or pneumatic
9032 89 Other
9032 89 10 Electronic automatic regulators
9032 89 90 Other
9032 90 00 Parts and accessories
9033 00 00 Parts and accessories (not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter) for machines, appliances, instruments or apparatus of chapter 90.
 
 
It is evident from the head note under 8481 that this heading covers various types of Taps, Locks, Valves etc. The Automatic Tap manufactured by the appellant, no doubt incorporates an electronic control device, but functions as a Tap to regulate the flow of liquid. Consequently, the essential character of the products remains the tap and hence, it is rightly classifiable under CETH 8481.
In respect of the Automatic Flushing System for Urinal and WC, it is noted that the appellants manufacture only the electronic device that is fitted to the water supply line so as to flush the device automatically. However, WC/Urinal is not part of the goods manufactured by the appellant. The goods manufactured are in the nature of instruments/apparatus for automatically controlling of the flow of the fluid. Hence, these are most appropriately classifiable under CETH 9032, as ordered in the impugned order.
In the result, the impugned order is upheld and the appeal is dismissed.
 
Decision: Appeal Dismissed
Comment: The analogy of the caseis that it is concluded that the applicant is engaged in manufacture of Automatic Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified  under the heading 9032 of central  excise Tariff and Automatic Water Tap would be classified under the Heading 8481 of Central Excise Tariff.
Prepared By: Pushpa Choudhary
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com