Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2018-2019/3464

Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff?
Case:AOS SYSTEMS VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI
Citation:2018 (13) G.S.T.L. 167 (Tri. - Del.)
Issue:Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff?
Brief facts: The appeal is against the Order-in-Appeal No. 24/2016, dated 27-3-2017. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems. All three products are hand free plumbing products, which are normally used in public toilets. In the case of Automatic Tap, when the hands of the user break the infrared beams, the device is activated and the flow of water commences. In the case of Automatic Urinal and WC Flushing Systems, the system gets activated when the person moves away and flushing happens. The appellant classified the products under CETH 8543 90, since they commenced manufacture in 1998. In the budget of 2014, a concessional rate of duty of 10 per cent was prescribed for the goods falling under Chapter 84 and 85. This exemption notification remained in force from 17-2-2014 of 31-2-2014. The Department was of the view that the appellant had wrongly classified the product under 8543 90 and cleared the same by paying duty at the rate of 10 per cent. The Original Authority vide his order dated 31-12-2015 ordered classification of all the three products under CETH 9032 89 10 and held them as liable to duty at 12 per cent as against the concessional rate of 10 per cent. However, the Commissioner (Appeals), in the impugned order, ordered classification of the Automatic Taps under CETH 8481 and the other two products under CETH 9032. Aggrieved by the impugned order the present appeal has been filed, in which the appellant has claimed the classification of all the products under CETH 8481.
 
Appellant’s contention:Applicant submits that the there is no material difference between the three products for the purpose of classification. He cited the ruling of US Customs to justify the classification of all the products under 8481.
 
Respondent’s Contention:The Ld. DR on the other hand, justified the impugned order. He referred to the leaflet of the products manufactured by the appellant and argued that the classification ordered by the Commissioner (Appeals) is correct.

Reasoning of Judgement: We have heard both sides and perused the records. The three products manufactured by the appellant are:-
(i)    The Automatic Water Tap :-
This is a water tap in which a sensor is located which controls flow automatically, once a hand is placed or removed near the tap.
(ii)   Automatic Flushing System for urinal;
(iii)  Automatic Flushing System for WC.
In respect of the items at (ii), (iii) the appellant manufactures only the electronic device which is operated through batteries and mounted on the water lines and placed on the wall. After someone uses the urinal/WC and moves away, the sensor in the system operates the flow of water and cleans urinal/WC. It is to be noted that the electronic device manufactured by the appellant does not come fitted on any WC or Urinal. The competing CETH, 8481 as well as 9032 are copied below for ready reference.
8481 Taps cocks, valves and similar appliances for pips, boiler shells, tanks, vas or the like, including pressure - reducing valves and thermostatically controlled valves.
8481 10 00 Pressure - reducing valves
8481 20 00 Valves for oleo hydraulic or pneumatic transmission
8481 30 00 Check non-return valves
8481 40 00 Safety or relief valves
8481 80 Other appliances
8481 80 10 Taps, cooks and similar appliances of iron or steel
8481 80 20 Taps, cooks and similar appliances of non-ferrous, metal
8481 80 30 Industrial valves (excluding pressure-reducing valves, and thermostatically controlled valves).
  Inner tube valves
8481 80 41 For bicycles
8481 80 49 Other
8481 80 50 Expansion valves and solenoid valves for refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery
8481 80 90 Other
8481 90 Parts
8481 90 10 Bicycle valves
8481 90 90 Other
 
CETH 9032 :- Automatic regulating or controlling instruments and apparatus.
9032 Automatic regulation or controlling instruments and apparatus
9032 10 Thermostats
9032 10 10 For refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery
9032 10 90 Other
9032 20 Manos tats
9032 20 10 For refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery
9032 20 90 Other
  Other instruments and apparatus
9032 81 00 Hydraulic or pneumatic
9032 89 Other
9032 89 10 Electronic automatic regulators
9032 89 90 Other
9032 90 00 Parts and accessories
9033 00 00 Parts and accessories (not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter) for machines, appliances, instruments or apparatus of chapter 90.
 
 
It is evident from the head note under 8481 that this heading covers various types of Taps, Locks, Valves etc. The Automatic Tap manufactured by the appellant, no doubt incorporates an electronic control device, but functions as a Tap to regulate the flow of liquid. Consequently, the essential character of the products remains the tap and hence, it is rightly classifiable under CETH 8481.
In respect of the Automatic Flushing System for Urinal and WC, it is noted that the appellants manufacture only the electronic device that is fitted to the water supply line so as to flush the device automatically. However, WC/Urinal is not part of the goods manufactured by the appellant. The goods manufactured are in the nature of instruments/apparatus for automatically controlling of the flow of the fluid. Hence, these are most appropriately classifiable under CETH 9032, as ordered in the impugned order.
In the result, the impugned order is upheld and the appeal is dismissed.
 
Decision: Appeal Dismissed
Comment: The analogy of the caseis that it is concluded that the applicant is engaged in manufacture of Automatic Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified  under the heading 9032 of central  excise Tariff and Automatic Water Tap would be classified under the Heading 8481 of Central Excise Tariff.
Prepared By: Pushpa Choudhary
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com