Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2018-2019/3464

Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff?
Case:AOS SYSTEMS VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI
Citation:2018 (13) G.S.T.L. 167 (Tri. - Del.)
Issue:Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff?
Brief facts: The appeal is against the Order-in-Appeal No. 24/2016, dated 27-3-2017. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems. All three products are hand free plumbing products, which are normally used in public toilets. In the case of Automatic Tap, when the hands of the user break the infrared beams, the device is activated and the flow of water commences. In the case of Automatic Urinal and WC Flushing Systems, the system gets activated when the person moves away and flushing happens. The appellant classified the products under CETH 8543 90, since they commenced manufacture in 1998. In the budget of 2014, a concessional rate of duty of 10 per cent was prescribed for the goods falling under Chapter 84 and 85. This exemption notification remained in force from 17-2-2014 of 31-2-2014. The Department was of the view that the appellant had wrongly classified the product under 8543 90 and cleared the same by paying duty at the rate of 10 per cent. The Original Authority vide his order dated 31-12-2015 ordered classification of all the three products under CETH 9032 89 10 and held them as liable to duty at 12 per cent as against the concessional rate of 10 per cent. However, the Commissioner (Appeals), in the impugned order, ordered classification of the Automatic Taps under CETH 8481 and the other two products under CETH 9032. Aggrieved by the impugned order the present appeal has been filed, in which the appellant has claimed the classification of all the products under CETH 8481.
 
Appellant’s contention:Applicant submits that the there is no material difference between the three products for the purpose of classification. He cited the ruling of US Customs to justify the classification of all the products under 8481.
 
Respondent’s Contention:The Ld. DR on the other hand, justified the impugned order. He referred to the leaflet of the products manufactured by the appellant and argued that the classification ordered by the Commissioner (Appeals) is correct.

Reasoning of Judgement: We have heard both sides and perused the records. The three products manufactured by the appellant are:-
(i)    The Automatic Water Tap :-
This is a water tap in which a sensor is located which controls flow automatically, once a hand is placed or removed near the tap.
(ii)   Automatic Flushing System for urinal;
(iii)  Automatic Flushing System for WC.
In respect of the items at (ii), (iii) the appellant manufactures only the electronic device which is operated through batteries and mounted on the water lines and placed on the wall. After someone uses the urinal/WC and moves away, the sensor in the system operates the flow of water and cleans urinal/WC. It is to be noted that the electronic device manufactured by the appellant does not come fitted on any WC or Urinal. The competing CETH, 8481 as well as 9032 are copied below for ready reference.
8481 Taps cocks, valves and similar appliances for pips, boiler shells, tanks, vas or the like, including pressure - reducing valves and thermostatically controlled valves.
8481 10 00 Pressure - reducing valves
8481 20 00 Valves for oleo hydraulic or pneumatic transmission
8481 30 00 Check non-return valves
8481 40 00 Safety or relief valves
8481 80 Other appliances
8481 80 10 Taps, cooks and similar appliances of iron or steel
8481 80 20 Taps, cooks and similar appliances of non-ferrous, metal
8481 80 30 Industrial valves (excluding pressure-reducing valves, and thermostatically controlled valves).
  Inner tube valves
8481 80 41 For bicycles
8481 80 49 Other
8481 80 50 Expansion valves and solenoid valves for refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery
8481 80 90 Other
8481 90 Parts
8481 90 10 Bicycle valves
8481 90 90 Other
 
CETH 9032 :- Automatic regulating or controlling instruments and apparatus.
9032 Automatic regulation or controlling instruments and apparatus
9032 10 Thermostats
9032 10 10 For refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery
9032 10 90 Other
9032 20 Manos tats
9032 20 10 For refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery
9032 20 90 Other
  Other instruments and apparatus
9032 81 00 Hydraulic or pneumatic
9032 89 Other
9032 89 10 Electronic automatic regulators
9032 89 90 Other
9032 90 00 Parts and accessories
9033 00 00 Parts and accessories (not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter) for machines, appliances, instruments or apparatus of chapter 90.
 
 
It is evident from the head note under 8481 that this heading covers various types of Taps, Locks, Valves etc. The Automatic Tap manufactured by the appellant, no doubt incorporates an electronic control device, but functions as a Tap to regulate the flow of liquid. Consequently, the essential character of the products remains the tap and hence, it is rightly classifiable under CETH 8481.
In respect of the Automatic Flushing System for Urinal and WC, it is noted that the appellants manufacture only the electronic device that is fitted to the water supply line so as to flush the device automatically. However, WC/Urinal is not part of the goods manufactured by the appellant. The goods manufactured are in the nature of instruments/apparatus for automatically controlling of the flow of the fluid. Hence, these are most appropriately classifiable under CETH 9032, as ordered in the impugned order.
In the result, the impugned order is upheld and the appeal is dismissed.
 
Decision: Appeal Dismissed
Comment: The analogy of the caseis that it is concluded that the applicant is engaged in manufacture of Automatic Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified  under the heading 9032 of central  excise Tariff and Automatic Water Tap would be classified under the Heading 8481 of Central Excise Tariff.
Prepared By: Pushpa Choudhary
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com