Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2013-14/1725

Whether assessee reversing 8% of exempted value for first two months be allowed to opt for proportionate reversal in the same financial year?

Case:- TATA STEEL LTD VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX, JAMSHEDPUR

Citation:-2013-TIOL-1287-CESTAT-KOL

Brief Facts:-This is an application filed seeking waiver of pre-deposit of CENVAT Credit of Rs.4.35 crores and equal amount of penalty imposed under Rule 15 (2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Narrating the facts, in brief, the Ld. Sr. Advocate Dr. Chakraborty has submitted that the applicants are engaged in the manufacture of finished goods viz. Coke. In the manufacture of the said finished goods, various inputs were used on which they avail CENVAT credit. Further, he has submitted that in the process of manufacture of said finished goods, exempted products viz. Coal Tar and coke oven gas also emerge. The Ld. Advocate submitted that since the applicants were not able to maintain separate accounts of the inputs used in or in relation to the manufacture of dutiable products i.e. coke and exempted products viz. Coal Tar and Coke Oven Gas, they have been paying 8%/10% of the price of the exempted goods as per sub-rule (3) of Rule (6) of Cenvat Credit rules, 2004.

Appellant’s Contention:-The Appellant submitted that w.e.f. 01.04.2008, the said Rule 6 of CCR, 2004 has been amended, and under clause (i), the earlier position has been continued. But, under Clause (ii), the assessee is given an option to pay an amount equal to the Cenvat Credit attributable to the input and input services used in or in relation to the manufacture of exempted finished goods by following the procedure prescribed under Sub-rule (3A) of said Rule 6 CCR, 2004. It is his contention that the relevant data relating to the Cenvat credit, attributable to the inputs used in the exempted products were not readily available with the applicant as on 1/4/2008, hence, they could not exercise their option at the beginning of the Financial year. However, after collecting the necessary data, on 29/5/2008, the applicant wrote a letter to the Range Superintendent exercising their option as laid down under sub-rule 3(A) of Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Ld. Sr. Advocate further submitted that the said request was rejected by the Department on 5th of June, 2008. The ld. Advocate further submitted that merely because in the initial two months, they have paid 10% of the price of the exempted goods, it could not be construed that they have exercised option to discharge their obligation under clause (i) of sub-rule (3) of Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit rules, 2004. In support, he has referred to the judgment of the Larger Bench in the case of Ankit Packaging Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Central Excise, Hyderabad-2004 (165) E.L.T. 228 (Tri. -LB) = (2004-TIOL-54-CESTAT-DEL-LB).

Respondent’s Contention:-The Respondent has submitted that Sub Rule (3) of Rule 6 of CCR, 2004 is specific, in the sense that the applicant is required to follow either of the procedure i.e clause (i) or (ii) as laid down under the said Rule. It is his submission that if a procedure has been followed, the same cannot be abruptly changed, in the same financial year, in view of the Explanation-I to clause (ii) to sub-rule 3 of said Rule 6 of CCR, 2004. In the instant case by choosing to discharge 8%/10% of the price of the exempted products at the beginning of the Financial year, the Applicant had exercised their option under clause (i) and hence they should not be allowed to change during the same financial year. The Ld. Special Counsel also submitted that even if there is a strong prima facie case in favour of the applicant, in view of the principles of law laid down for disposal of the stay petitions in view of the principles laid down in a number of cases including in M/s. Benera Valves Vs. Commr. of Central Excise-2008 (012) STR 0104 (SC) = (2006-TIOL-156-SC) and the recent case of Mayo College General Council Vs. Commr. of C.Ex. (Appeals), Jaipur-II- 2012 (28) S.T.R. 225 (Raj.) = (2012-TIOL-878­HC-RAJ-ST] and the judgment in the case of Commr. of Central Excise, Guntur Vs. Sri Chaitanya Educational Committee-2011 (22) STR 135 (AP) = (2011-TIOL-147-HC-AP-ST), the applicant be directed to deposit from the confirmed amount to safeguard the interest of Revenue.

Reasoning of Judgment:-We find that the limited issue involved in the present case is availing of the benefits of procedures laid down under clause (i) or Clause (ii) of the amended Sub-Rule (3) of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 brought into force w.e.f. 01/4/2008. It is the case of the Revenue that once the assessee continues to pay 10% of the price of the exempted goods at the beginning of the Financial year, without exercising option to reverse proportionate credit under clause (ii) of Sub-Rule (3) of Rule 6 of CCR, 2004, then, in the same financial year, he cannot be allowed to resort to clause(ii) of Sub-Rule (3) of Rule 6 of CCR, 2004. The contention of the applicant is that since they have not exercised any option for availing the benefit under Sub-Rule (i), but paid 8%/10% of the price of the exempted goods due to non-availability of data, they cannot be precluded in exercising their option under Clause (ii) during the same financial year in view of the judgment of the Larger Bench's decision in the case of Ankit Packaging Ltd. (supra). Undisputedly, the applicant has made a request to the Department seeking permission to exercise their option under Clause (ii) of Sub-Rule (3) of Rule 6 of CCR, 2004 on 29th May, 2008. Also, we find that to exercise option under Sub-Rule (ii), mere exercise of such option is not enough but the conditions/procedure laid down under Sub-rule 3 (A) of said Rule 6 is required to be followed by furnishing the details mentioned therein. Prima facie, in the present case, we find that after availability of necessary data necessary to exercise option under clause (ii), the applicant, made an application on 29th of May, 2008 complying with the conditions prescribed under Sub-Rule 3A. In view of the decision of the Larger Bench in Ankit Packaging case (Supra), prima facie, we are of the opinion that mere discharging 10% of the price of the exempted goods due to non-availability of data at the beginning of the Financial year, would not disentitle them in exercising their option later during the same financial year under clause (ii) of Sub-Rule (3) of Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. In these circumstances, we find that the applicant could able to make out prima facie a case for total waiver of pre-deposit of dues adjudged against them, accordingly, all dues adjudged is waived and its recovery stayed during the pendency of the appeal.
Decision:-Stay Petition allowed.

Comment:-The essence of this case is that mere discharging 10% of the price of the exempted goods due to non-availability of data at the beginning of the Financial year, would not disentitle the assessee from exercising the option of proportionate reversal later during the same financial year.
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com