Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2014-15/2491

Whether arranging loans for customers from financial institutions leviable to service tax under BAS?

Case:- COMMR. OF C. EX., CHANDIGARH VERSUS PIONEER FINANCIAL SERVICES
 
Citation:- 2014 (36) S.T.R. 117 (Tri. - Del.)


Brief facts:- Brief facts of the case are that M/s. Pioneer Financial Services (hereinafter referred to as Respondents) are registered with Department for providing Business Auxiliary Service with effect from 3-12-2004. They did not file any Service Tax Return during the period 12/2004 to 3/2007. Respondents are arranging loans for the customers from various financial institutions like LIC Housing, IDBI bank and HDFC bank and promoting and marketing the services of these financial institutions. Department felt that this activity of the Respondents is covered under Business Auxiliary Service as defined under Section 65(19) of the Finance Act. Accordingly a Show Cause Notice dated 14-8-2008 was issued to the Respondents demanding Service Tax with interest and also proposing penalties on them. This Show Cause Notice was adjudicated by the Deputy Commissioner vide Order-in-Original No. 66/2010, dated 20-1-2010, who confirmed the service tax of Rs. 1,81,819/- along with interest after invoking the extended period. He imposed the penalty under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Act on the Respondents. Respondents filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), who vide impugned order has reduced the demand to Rs. 26,862/- and upheld the penalty under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act but dropped the penalty under Section 78 of the Act. Revenue has challenged the impugned order in the present appeal. Respondent also filed cross objection to the appeal.
 
Appellant’s contention:-Ld. DR for Revenue submits that Show Cause Notice was issued to the Respondents demanding service tax from them under Business Auxiliary Service as they are promoting and marketing service of LIC Housing/HDFC bank, etc., but the Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the Respondents are providing Business Auxiliary Service on behalf of the client and are therefore eligible for exemption under Notifications 25/2004, dated 10-9-2004 and 14/2004, dated 10-9-2004. He submits these Notifications are not applicable to the Respondent as they are covered under clause (ii) of the definition of Business Auxiliary Service for promotion or marketing of service. He submits order of the Commissioner (Appeals) needs to be set aside.
 
Respondent’s contention:- Ld. Authorised Representative for Respondents submits that Respondents are doing documentation and verification work for their client and therefore they are eligible for benefit of exemption Notifications 14/2004 and 25/2004 both dated 10-9-2004. Since they were providing services on behalf of their client, they are eligible for exemption under these Notifications.
 
Reasoning of judgment:- The Hon’ble Tribunal find that there is no dispute that activity of the Respondents is under Business Auxiliary Service. Only issues involved in this case is whether Respondents are promoting or marketing the services of financial institution or providing services on behalf of the client and are eligible for exemption under Notifications 14/2004 and 25/2004, both dated 10-9-2004.
For sake of convenience, they reproduce below provisions of Business Auxiliary Service as under:-
“Business Auxiliary Services” means any service in relation to,-
(i)     Promotion or marketing or sale of goods produce or provided by or belonging to the client; or
(ii)    Promotion or marketing of service provided by the client; or
(iii)   Any customer care service provided on behalf of the client; or
(iv)   Procurement of goods services, which are inputs for the client.
        Explanation :- For the removal of doubt, it is hereby declared that for the purposes of this sub-clause, “inputs” means all goods or services intended for use by the client; or
(v)    Production or processing of goods for, or on behalf of, the client; or
(vi)   Provision of service on behalf of the client; or
(vii)  A service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in  sub-clauses (i) to (iv), such as billing, issue or collection or recovery of cheques, payments, maintenance of accounts and remittance, inventory management, evaluation or development of prospective customer or vendor, public relation services, management or supervision.
and includes services as a commission agent, but l(does not include any activity that amounts to manufacture of excisable goods.)
Further Notifications 14/2004 and 25/2004 both dated 10-9-2004 read as under:
Notification 25/2004, dated 10-9-2004.
“In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts that portion of the value of following taxable services, namely-
(a)    Services provided to a customer, by a commissioning and installation agency in relation to erection;
(b)    Services provided to any person, by a sub-broker in connection with the sale and purchase of securities listed on a recognised stock exchange;
(c)    Services provided to any person by a multisystem operator in relation to cable services;
(d)    Services provided to a client by a commercial concern in relation to the following business auxiliary services namely:-
(i)     Procurement of goods or services, which are inputs for the client;
(ii)    Production of goods on behalf of the client;
(iii)   Provision of service on behalf of the client; or
(iv)   A service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in (i) to (iii) above;
(e)    Services provided to a customer by any body corporate or commercial concern, other than a banking company or a financial institution including a non-banking financial company, in relation to banking and other financial services;
(f)     Service provided to a customer by a banking company or a financial institution including a non-banking financial company in relation to financial services namely lending; issue of pay order, demand draft, cheque, letter of credit and bill of exchange; providing bank guarantee, over draft facility, bill discounting facility, safe deposit locker, safe vaults; operation of bank accounts;
(g)    Services provided to any person by a tour operator, other than a tour operator engaged in the business of operating tours in a tourist vehicle covered by a permit granted under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 or rules made thereunder, in relation to a tour; and
(h)    Service provided to a policy holder, by an insurer carrying on life insurance business in relation to the risk cover in life insurance,
From the whole service tax leviable thereon under section 66 of the said Act, which is received by the service provider prior to the 10th day of September, 2004.”
Notification 14/2004, dated 10-9-2004.
“In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts taxable service provided to a client by a commercial concern in relation to the business auxiliary service, in so far as it relates to,-
(a)    Procurement of goods or services, which are inputs for the client;
(b)    Production of goods on behalf of the client;
(c)    Provision of service on behalf of the client; or
(d)    A service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in (a) to (c) above.
From the whole of the service tax leviable thereon under section 66 of the said Finance Act:
Provided that nothing in this notification shall apply to,-
(i)     A factory registered under or governed by the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948);
(ii)    A company established by or under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);
(iii)   A partnership firm, whether registered or not registered;
(iv)   A society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or under any law corresponding to that Act in force in any part of India;
(v)    A co-operative society established by or under any law;
(vi)   A corporation established by or under any law; or
(vii)  A body corporate established by or under any law,
Unless such factory, partnership firm, society, co-operative society, corporation or body corporate, as the case may be, provides any business auxiliary service in respect of any activity specified in (a) and (b) above in relation to agriculture, printing, textile processing or education.”
They find that activity of the Respondents is arranging loans from various financial institutions like LIC Housing, IDBI bank and HDFC bank. They are procuring customers for these institutions and get the loan sanctioned to these customers and in lieu of this service they receive the commission from these institutions and this way they are promoting or marketing the services of these institutions and are squarely covered under clause (ii) of definition of Business Auxiliary Service.
The Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the Respondents are providing the services on behalf of the client. They find that loans are sanctioned by the Financial Institutions only. It is not the case of Respondents that they are giving the loan amount to the customers and getting the same reimbursed from these Banks. Services provided by the Respondents cannot be said to have been provided on behalf of the client and accordingly they also become ineligible for exemption under Notifications 14/2004 and 25/2004, both dated 10-9-2004. They therefore set aside this finding of the Commissioner and restore the Order-in-Original with regard to confirmation of service tax, interest and penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of the Act. They find that Revenue has not challenged dropping of penalty under Section 78 of the Act by the Commissioner (Appeals). They therefore do not interfere with this finding of the Commissioner (Appeals). They also find that Respondents in cross objections have pointed out calculation mistake of Rs. 5,948/- in computing the demand. Revenue also agrees to this mistake. Accordingly tax amount gets reduced to Rs. 1, 81,819/- – Rs. 5,948/- = Rs. 1, 75,871.
Revenue’s appeal is allowed.
 
Decision:- Appeal allowed.
 
Comment:- The Respondents are arranging loans from various financial institution. Respondent received Commission for procurement of customers and getting loans sanctioned for customers. Therefore, the services provided by them are covered by promotion and marketing services and are leviable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service. Services provided by respondent cannot be said to have been provided on behalf of client. Hence, they are not eligible for benefit of exemption under notification no. 14/2004 and 25/2004.
 
Prepared by:- Monika Tak

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com