Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2014-15/2491

Whether arranging loans for customers from financial institutions leviable to service tax under BAS?

Case:- COMMR. OF C. EX., CHANDIGARH VERSUS PIONEER FINANCIAL SERVICES
 
Citation:- 2014 (36) S.T.R. 117 (Tri. - Del.)


Brief facts:- Brief facts of the case are that M/s. Pioneer Financial Services (hereinafter referred to as Respondents) are registered with Department for providing Business Auxiliary Service with effect from 3-12-2004. They did not file any Service Tax Return during the period 12/2004 to 3/2007. Respondents are arranging loans for the customers from various financial institutions like LIC Housing, IDBI bank and HDFC bank and promoting and marketing the services of these financial institutions. Department felt that this activity of the Respondents is covered under Business Auxiliary Service as defined under Section 65(19) of the Finance Act. Accordingly a Show Cause Notice dated 14-8-2008 was issued to the Respondents demanding Service Tax with interest and also proposing penalties on them. This Show Cause Notice was adjudicated by the Deputy Commissioner vide Order-in-Original No. 66/2010, dated 20-1-2010, who confirmed the service tax of Rs. 1,81,819/- along with interest after invoking the extended period. He imposed the penalty under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Act on the Respondents. Respondents filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), who vide impugned order has reduced the demand to Rs. 26,862/- and upheld the penalty under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act but dropped the penalty under Section 78 of the Act. Revenue has challenged the impugned order in the present appeal. Respondent also filed cross objection to the appeal.
 
Appellant’s contention:-Ld. DR for Revenue submits that Show Cause Notice was issued to the Respondents demanding service tax from them under Business Auxiliary Service as they are promoting and marketing service of LIC Housing/HDFC bank, etc., but the Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the Respondents are providing Business Auxiliary Service on behalf of the client and are therefore eligible for exemption under Notifications 25/2004, dated 10-9-2004 and 14/2004, dated 10-9-2004. He submits these Notifications are not applicable to the Respondent as they are covered under clause (ii) of the definition of Business Auxiliary Service for promotion or marketing of service. He submits order of the Commissioner (Appeals) needs to be set aside.
 
Respondent’s contention:- Ld. Authorised Representative for Respondents submits that Respondents are doing documentation and verification work for their client and therefore they are eligible for benefit of exemption Notifications 14/2004 and 25/2004 both dated 10-9-2004. Since they were providing services on behalf of their client, they are eligible for exemption under these Notifications.
 
Reasoning of judgment:- The Hon’ble Tribunal find that there is no dispute that activity of the Respondents is under Business Auxiliary Service. Only issues involved in this case is whether Respondents are promoting or marketing the services of financial institution or providing services on behalf of the client and are eligible for exemption under Notifications 14/2004 and 25/2004, both dated 10-9-2004.
For sake of convenience, they reproduce below provisions of Business Auxiliary Service as under:-
“Business Auxiliary Services” means any service in relation to,-
(i)     Promotion or marketing or sale of goods produce or provided by or belonging to the client; or
(ii)    Promotion or marketing of service provided by the client; or
(iii)   Any customer care service provided on behalf of the client; or
(iv)   Procurement of goods services, which are inputs for the client.
        Explanation :- For the removal of doubt, it is hereby declared that for the purposes of this sub-clause, “inputs” means all goods or services intended for use by the client; or
(v)    Production or processing of goods for, or on behalf of, the client; or
(vi)   Provision of service on behalf of the client; or
(vii)  A service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in  sub-clauses (i) to (iv), such as billing, issue or collection or recovery of cheques, payments, maintenance of accounts and remittance, inventory management, evaluation or development of prospective customer or vendor, public relation services, management or supervision.
and includes services as a commission agent, but l(does not include any activity that amounts to manufacture of excisable goods.)
Further Notifications 14/2004 and 25/2004 both dated 10-9-2004 read as under:
Notification 25/2004, dated 10-9-2004.
“In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts that portion of the value of following taxable services, namely-
(a)    Services provided to a customer, by a commissioning and installation agency in relation to erection;
(b)    Services provided to any person, by a sub-broker in connection with the sale and purchase of securities listed on a recognised stock exchange;
(c)    Services provided to any person by a multisystem operator in relation to cable services;
(d)    Services provided to a client by a commercial concern in relation to the following business auxiliary services namely:-
(i)     Procurement of goods or services, which are inputs for the client;
(ii)    Production of goods on behalf of the client;
(iii)   Provision of service on behalf of the client; or
(iv)   A service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in (i) to (iii) above;
(e)    Services provided to a customer by any body corporate or commercial concern, other than a banking company or a financial institution including a non-banking financial company, in relation to banking and other financial services;
(f)     Service provided to a customer by a banking company or a financial institution including a non-banking financial company in relation to financial services namely lending; issue of pay order, demand draft, cheque, letter of credit and bill of exchange; providing bank guarantee, over draft facility, bill discounting facility, safe deposit locker, safe vaults; operation of bank accounts;
(g)    Services provided to any person by a tour operator, other than a tour operator engaged in the business of operating tours in a tourist vehicle covered by a permit granted under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 or rules made thereunder, in relation to a tour; and
(h)    Service provided to a policy holder, by an insurer carrying on life insurance business in relation to the risk cover in life insurance,
From the whole service tax leviable thereon under section 66 of the said Act, which is received by the service provider prior to the 10th day of September, 2004.”
Notification 14/2004, dated 10-9-2004.
“In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts taxable service provided to a client by a commercial concern in relation to the business auxiliary service, in so far as it relates to,-
(a)    Procurement of goods or services, which are inputs for the client;
(b)    Production of goods on behalf of the client;
(c)    Provision of service on behalf of the client; or
(d)    A service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in (a) to (c) above.
From the whole of the service tax leviable thereon under section 66 of the said Finance Act:
Provided that nothing in this notification shall apply to,-
(i)     A factory registered under or governed by the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948);
(ii)    A company established by or under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);
(iii)   A partnership firm, whether registered or not registered;
(iv)   A society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or under any law corresponding to that Act in force in any part of India;
(v)    A co-operative society established by or under any law;
(vi)   A corporation established by or under any law; or
(vii)  A body corporate established by or under any law,
Unless such factory, partnership firm, society, co-operative society, corporation or body corporate, as the case may be, provides any business auxiliary service in respect of any activity specified in (a) and (b) above in relation to agriculture, printing, textile processing or education.”
They find that activity of the Respondents is arranging loans from various financial institutions like LIC Housing, IDBI bank and HDFC bank. They are procuring customers for these institutions and get the loan sanctioned to these customers and in lieu of this service they receive the commission from these institutions and this way they are promoting or marketing the services of these institutions and are squarely covered under clause (ii) of definition of Business Auxiliary Service.
The Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the Respondents are providing the services on behalf of the client. They find that loans are sanctioned by the Financial Institutions only. It is not the case of Respondents that they are giving the loan amount to the customers and getting the same reimbursed from these Banks. Services provided by the Respondents cannot be said to have been provided on behalf of the client and accordingly they also become ineligible for exemption under Notifications 14/2004 and 25/2004, both dated 10-9-2004. They therefore set aside this finding of the Commissioner and restore the Order-in-Original with regard to confirmation of service tax, interest and penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of the Act. They find that Revenue has not challenged dropping of penalty under Section 78 of the Act by the Commissioner (Appeals). They therefore do not interfere with this finding of the Commissioner (Appeals). They also find that Respondents in cross objections have pointed out calculation mistake of Rs. 5,948/- in computing the demand. Revenue also agrees to this mistake. Accordingly tax amount gets reduced to Rs. 1, 81,819/- – Rs. 5,948/- = Rs. 1, 75,871.
Revenue’s appeal is allowed.
 
Decision:- Appeal allowed.
 
Comment:- The Respondents are arranging loans from various financial institution. Respondent received Commission for procurement of customers and getting loans sanctioned for customers. Therefore, the services provided by them are covered by promotion and marketing services and are leviable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service. Services provided by respondent cannot be said to have been provided on behalf of client. Hence, they are not eligible for benefit of exemption under notification no. 14/2004 and 25/2004.
 
Prepared by:- Monika Tak

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com