Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2014-15/2491

Whether arranging loans for customers from financial institutions leviable to service tax under BAS?

Case:- COMMR. OF C. EX., CHANDIGARH VERSUS PIONEER FINANCIAL SERVICES
 
Citation:- 2014 (36) S.T.R. 117 (Tri. - Del.)


Brief facts:- Brief facts of the case are that M/s. Pioneer Financial Services (hereinafter referred to as Respondents) are registered with Department for providing Business Auxiliary Service with effect from 3-12-2004. They did not file any Service Tax Return during the period 12/2004 to 3/2007. Respondents are arranging loans for the customers from various financial institutions like LIC Housing, IDBI bank and HDFC bank and promoting and marketing the services of these financial institutions. Department felt that this activity of the Respondents is covered under Business Auxiliary Service as defined under Section 65(19) of the Finance Act. Accordingly a Show Cause Notice dated 14-8-2008 was issued to the Respondents demanding Service Tax with interest and also proposing penalties on them. This Show Cause Notice was adjudicated by the Deputy Commissioner vide Order-in-Original No. 66/2010, dated 20-1-2010, who confirmed the service tax of Rs. 1,81,819/- along with interest after invoking the extended period. He imposed the penalty under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Act on the Respondents. Respondents filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), who vide impugned order has reduced the demand to Rs. 26,862/- and upheld the penalty under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act but dropped the penalty under Section 78 of the Act. Revenue has challenged the impugned order in the present appeal. Respondent also filed cross objection to the appeal.
 
Appellant’s contention:-Ld. DR for Revenue submits that Show Cause Notice was issued to the Respondents demanding service tax from them under Business Auxiliary Service as they are promoting and marketing service of LIC Housing/HDFC bank, etc., but the Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the Respondents are providing Business Auxiliary Service on behalf of the client and are therefore eligible for exemption under Notifications 25/2004, dated 10-9-2004 and 14/2004, dated 10-9-2004. He submits these Notifications are not applicable to the Respondent as they are covered under clause (ii) of the definition of Business Auxiliary Service for promotion or marketing of service. He submits order of the Commissioner (Appeals) needs to be set aside.
 
Respondent’s contention:- Ld. Authorised Representative for Respondents submits that Respondents are doing documentation and verification work for their client and therefore they are eligible for benefit of exemption Notifications 14/2004 and 25/2004 both dated 10-9-2004. Since they were providing services on behalf of their client, they are eligible for exemption under these Notifications.
 
Reasoning of judgment:- The Hon’ble Tribunal find that there is no dispute that activity of the Respondents is under Business Auxiliary Service. Only issues involved in this case is whether Respondents are promoting or marketing the services of financial institution or providing services on behalf of the client and are eligible for exemption under Notifications 14/2004 and 25/2004, both dated 10-9-2004.
For sake of convenience, they reproduce below provisions of Business Auxiliary Service as under:-
“Business Auxiliary Services” means any service in relation to,-
(i)     Promotion or marketing or sale of goods produce or provided by or belonging to the client; or
(ii)    Promotion or marketing of service provided by the client; or
(iii)   Any customer care service provided on behalf of the client; or
(iv)   Procurement of goods services, which are inputs for the client.
        Explanation :- For the removal of doubt, it is hereby declared that for the purposes of this sub-clause, “inputs” means all goods or services intended for use by the client; or
(v)    Production or processing of goods for, or on behalf of, the client; or
(vi)   Provision of service on behalf of the client; or
(vii)  A service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in  sub-clauses (i) to (iv), such as billing, issue or collection or recovery of cheques, payments, maintenance of accounts and remittance, inventory management, evaluation or development of prospective customer or vendor, public relation services, management or supervision.
and includes services as a commission agent, but l(does not include any activity that amounts to manufacture of excisable goods.)
Further Notifications 14/2004 and 25/2004 both dated 10-9-2004 read as under:
Notification 25/2004, dated 10-9-2004.
“In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts that portion of the value of following taxable services, namely-
(a)    Services provided to a customer, by a commissioning and installation agency in relation to erection;
(b)    Services provided to any person, by a sub-broker in connection with the sale and purchase of securities listed on a recognised stock exchange;
(c)    Services provided to any person by a multisystem operator in relation to cable services;
(d)    Services provided to a client by a commercial concern in relation to the following business auxiliary services namely:-
(i)     Procurement of goods or services, which are inputs for the client;
(ii)    Production of goods on behalf of the client;
(iii)   Provision of service on behalf of the client; or
(iv)   A service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in (i) to (iii) above;
(e)    Services provided to a customer by any body corporate or commercial concern, other than a banking company or a financial institution including a non-banking financial company, in relation to banking and other financial services;
(f)     Service provided to a customer by a banking company or a financial institution including a non-banking financial company in relation to financial services namely lending; issue of pay order, demand draft, cheque, letter of credit and bill of exchange; providing bank guarantee, over draft facility, bill discounting facility, safe deposit locker, safe vaults; operation of bank accounts;
(g)    Services provided to any person by a tour operator, other than a tour operator engaged in the business of operating tours in a tourist vehicle covered by a permit granted under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 or rules made thereunder, in relation to a tour; and
(h)    Service provided to a policy holder, by an insurer carrying on life insurance business in relation to the risk cover in life insurance,
From the whole service tax leviable thereon under section 66 of the said Act, which is received by the service provider prior to the 10th day of September, 2004.”
Notification 14/2004, dated 10-9-2004.
“In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts taxable service provided to a client by a commercial concern in relation to the business auxiliary service, in so far as it relates to,-
(a)    Procurement of goods or services, which are inputs for the client;
(b)    Production of goods on behalf of the client;
(c)    Provision of service on behalf of the client; or
(d)    A service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in (a) to (c) above.
From the whole of the service tax leviable thereon under section 66 of the said Finance Act:
Provided that nothing in this notification shall apply to,-
(i)     A factory registered under or governed by the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948);
(ii)    A company established by or under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);
(iii)   A partnership firm, whether registered or not registered;
(iv)   A society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or under any law corresponding to that Act in force in any part of India;
(v)    A co-operative society established by or under any law;
(vi)   A corporation established by or under any law; or
(vii)  A body corporate established by or under any law,
Unless such factory, partnership firm, society, co-operative society, corporation or body corporate, as the case may be, provides any business auxiliary service in respect of any activity specified in (a) and (b) above in relation to agriculture, printing, textile processing or education.”
They find that activity of the Respondents is arranging loans from various financial institutions like LIC Housing, IDBI bank and HDFC bank. They are procuring customers for these institutions and get the loan sanctioned to these customers and in lieu of this service they receive the commission from these institutions and this way they are promoting or marketing the services of these institutions and are squarely covered under clause (ii) of definition of Business Auxiliary Service.
The Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the Respondents are providing the services on behalf of the client. They find that loans are sanctioned by the Financial Institutions only. It is not the case of Respondents that they are giving the loan amount to the customers and getting the same reimbursed from these Banks. Services provided by the Respondents cannot be said to have been provided on behalf of the client and accordingly they also become ineligible for exemption under Notifications 14/2004 and 25/2004, both dated 10-9-2004. They therefore set aside this finding of the Commissioner and restore the Order-in-Original with regard to confirmation of service tax, interest and penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of the Act. They find that Revenue has not challenged dropping of penalty under Section 78 of the Act by the Commissioner (Appeals). They therefore do not interfere with this finding of the Commissioner (Appeals). They also find that Respondents in cross objections have pointed out calculation mistake of Rs. 5,948/- in computing the demand. Revenue also agrees to this mistake. Accordingly tax amount gets reduced to Rs. 1, 81,819/- – Rs. 5,948/- = Rs. 1, 75,871.
Revenue’s appeal is allowed.
 
Decision:- Appeal allowed.
 
Comment:- The Respondents are arranging loans from various financial institution. Respondent received Commission for procurement of customers and getting loans sanctioned for customers. Therefore, the services provided by them are covered by promotion and marketing services and are leviable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service. Services provided by respondent cannot be said to have been provided on behalf of client. Hence, they are not eligible for benefit of exemption under notification no. 14/2004 and 25/2004.
 
Prepared by:- Monika Tak

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com