Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2018-2019/3517

Whether any particular thing (preparation and serving of food to children of government schools under Mid day Meal and government sponsored Anganwadi meals program/ sale of scrap items generated during Mid day meal program) done by the applicant with resp
Case:M/s The Akshaya Patra Foundation
Citation:RAJ/AAR/2018- 19/28,F.No.IV(4)26/AAR/RAJ/2018-19/134-135
 
Issue:Whether any particular thing (preparation and serving of food to children of government schools under Mid day Meal and government sponsored Anganwadi meals program/ sale of scrap items generated during Mid day meal program) done by the applicant with respect to any goods or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services?
Brief facts:The Applicant, Akshayapatra Foundation is registered with the GSTN 08AAATT6468P1ZL, is nonprofit organization. It’s headquarter is at Bengaluru and having establishments in 12 states across India. The applicant is serving meal to more than 17 lakhs students which are studying in 14000 Schools over in 12 states across the country. The applicant have rental income and the applicant is also registered under section 12AA (i.e. charitable trust) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The applicant strives to eliminate classroom hunger by implementing the Mid-Day meal scheme in the Government and Government aided schools. It also aims at countering malnutrition and supporting the right education of socio-economically disadvantaged Children. The applicant tries to banish hunger of the deprived economically backward and poor sections of the society and those hailing from rural area and slums in cities by every possible method, by providing free food. It seeks resort on whether Preparing and serving of food to children under Mid day meal and Anganwadi meals programme shall amount to Supply. Further sale of scrap items generated during mid day meal is covered under the scope of Supply or not.
Appellant’s contention:The appellant is operating 38 kitchens across 12 states in the country under the Guidelines wherein food grains and expenses for other ingredients, cooking cost and transportation expenses shall be reimbursed by the government. For each of the kitchen a MOU strictly as per the Guidelines of MHRD has been entered into with the respective authorities. Some important part of the Guidelines are extracted below which has a bearing on the question raised for advance ruling.
In Rajasthan a MOU entered with District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Jodhpur for serving Mid-Day meal to about 12000 Government school children dated 24th Oct 2016 which is valid for 3 years is enclosed. The key terms and conditions of the MOU which are important for the current context is mentioned below:
 1. Government would provide the Food Grains at an agreed quantum per child / meal for the expected average attendance in advance. Applicant shall provide the monthly report of details covering food grains received, utilized and balance in the prescribed format.
 2. For other food ingredients and conversion costs, Government would provide the cash conversion cost at agreed rates per child / meal.
3. To enable to reach nutritious, hygienically prepared quality meals to the children, applicant can raise donation, both in cash and kind to meet out deficit
4. All the additional expenses that may be required, on the preparation of the Mid-Day Meal as well as the transportation of the cooked meals to the schools in the project area shall be borne by the applicant
5. Menu will be in accordance as specified by the state Government from time to time
The applicant state that the above terms are mentioned commonly in all the MOUs entered into between the applicant with respective State Government. The copies of MOUs entered with Government of Gujarat for the implementing MDM program in Ahmedabad and with Government of Andhra Pradesh for implementing MDM program in Kuppam town provided with application as sample for reference.
The applicant raises funds by way of donation from Corporates, Trusts & Foundations and general public for meeting the expenditure incurred on Mid-Day meal program apart from free grains and food conversion cost received from government. The certified extract of official website of the applicant requesting for fund support from Donors is also enclosed, which shows the total cost, government subsidy and the deficit amount to be supported from donations.In course of providing Mid-Day Meal sometimes certain goods like spices, food grains, kitchen equipment and relevant spares (Boiler, Conveyor Belt Spares etc.), office equipment (Laptop, Computer, Stationery, Letter Head etc.), distribution vehicles are transferred from one kitchen of the applicant to another kitchen situated in a different state. It may be noted that the applicant has taken registration in various states for discharging GST liability on rental income and therefore they are 'distinct person' for the purpose of GST. During course of the activity of Mid-Day Meal, certain scrap in the form of empty oil & other tins, pipes & iron, empty bags, plastic items, cartoons, Flex & Boxes, spares parts of machine/equipment, vehicle & its parts like tyres etc. is generated which is sold from time to time. The sale proceeds of these items are recorded under the head 'miscellaneous income' in the books of accounts.
The applicant also carries out other charitable feeding programs such as Anganwadi feeding, wherein the part of the cost is met by Government Subsidy and the remaining cost is met through donations, private school feeding programs where entire 100% cost is met through donations. These programs are quite small in number and constitute about 10% of the total volume of meals. In none of the above programs, the applicant, charge/receive any money or consideration from the beneficiaries.

Reasoning of Judgement: The Respondent has undergone an analysis of the appellant’s contention that Subject to the provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2), the Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, specify, by notification, the transactions that are to be treated as,
  1. a supply of goods and not as a supply of services
 or
 (b) a supply of services and not as a supply of goods.
 Further, the definition of business under Section 2(17) of CGST Act includes,
 
 
(a) any trade, commerce, manufacture, profession, vocation, adventure, wager or any other similar activity, whether or not it is for a pecuniary benefit
 (b) any activity or transaction in connection with or incidental or ancillary to sub-clause (a); (c) any activity or transaction in the nature of sub-clause (a), whether or not there is volume, frequency, continuity or regularity of such transaction
 (d) supply or acquisition of goods including capital goods and services in connection with commencement or closure of business
 (e) provision by a club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration) of the facilities or benefits to its members
 (f) admission, for a consideration, of persons to any premises
(g) services supplied by a person as the holder of an office which has been accepted by him in the course or furtherance of his trade, profession or vocation
(h) services provided by a race club by way of totalisator or a licence to book maker in such club
(i) any activity or transaction undertaken by the Central Government, a State Government or any local authority in which they are engaged as public authorities;~ The word 'commerce' has several definitions which are as under:-As per Business Dictionary, it means exchange of goods or services for money or in kind, usually on a large scale enough to require transportation from place to place or across city, state or national boundaries.
In view of the above observations, the activity of preparation and serving of food under Mid Day Meal and Anganwadi meal programme undertaken by the applicant is covered under definition of business.
As per the documents submitted by the applicant They observe that the applicant is reimbursed as per the rate fixed by the Government of India or by the State Government for the transportation charges for lifting food grains from Food Corporation of India godown on basis of the release order.
It is further observed that the applicant is also paid /reimbursed of the cooking cost of the meals as per the instructions/norms of GOI / State Govt.
There is no exemption granted to charitable trusts in case of supply of goods which are taxable and are not specifically exempt or Nil rated. In case of exemption, a charitable trust is required to comply with certain conditions and the applicant is not covered in any of such activities.
The activities undertaken by the applicant under Mid-Day Meal Programme and Anganwadi meals programme is a supply in accordance with the Section 7 of CGST Act, 2017. However, MDM programme is taxed Nil by the virtue of Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017 mentioned at serial number 66 heading number 9962.
The Preparation and serving of food under Government sponsored Anganwadi meals programme which is undertaken by the applicant who receives reimbursement from the government of Rajasthan @ Rs.5.40 per pregnant women/lactating & nursing mothers/adolescent girls and Rs. 5.25 per child per day. Therefore, the above said activity is against consideration and hence it is covered under the scope of 'supply' as per section 7 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017.
As the activity of 'transfer' is covered under definition of supply under section 7 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017. Thus, the transfer of goods / capital equipments, exclusively used for Mid-Day Meal (MDM) program and Anganwadi meals program sponsored by Government, between different kitchens of applicant which are 'distinct persons' as per GST law is covered under the scope of 'supply' as per section 7 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017.
The scrap items which generates during course of the activity of Mid-Day Meal in form of empty oil 86 other tins, pipes 86 iron, empty bags, plastic items, cartoons, Flex 8& Boxes, spare parts of machine / equipment, vehicle 8& its parts like tyres etc. are sold from time to time is for a consideration. The sale proceeds of these items are recorded under the head miscellaneous income in the books of records. The sale of scrap is an activity of sale for a consideration as mentioned in definition of 'supply' as per section 7 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017.
Decision:The activity of  Preparation and serving of food to children of government schools under Mid-Day meal Program of Government and serving of food under Government sponsored Anganwadi meals program is covered under the scope of 'supply'. Further the transfer of goods/ capital equipments for the programs carried out by the applicant sponsored by government is covered under the scope of Supply as per section 7 of CGST Act. And sale of scrap items generated during Mid day meal is as well covered under the scope of Supply.
Comment: The Gist of the case is that preparation and serving of food to children of government schools under mid day meal program and government sponsored Anganwadi meals are covered under the scope of Supply. Though the activities provided by the applicant is for charitable purposes registered under Section 12AA and for social cause but in order to be out of ambit of definition of supply it needs to satisfy the specified conditions.
 
Prepared by:Himanshu Bhimani
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com