Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2018-2019/3517

Whether any particular thing (preparation and serving of food to children of government schools under Mid day Meal and government sponsored Anganwadi meals program/ sale of scrap items generated during Mid day meal program) done by the applicant with resp
Case:M/s The Akshaya Patra Foundation
Citation:RAJ/AAR/2018- 19/28,F.No.IV(4)26/AAR/RAJ/2018-19/134-135
 
Issue:Whether any particular thing (preparation and serving of food to children of government schools under Mid day Meal and government sponsored Anganwadi meals program/ sale of scrap items generated during Mid day meal program) done by the applicant with respect to any goods or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services?
Brief facts:The Applicant, Akshayapatra Foundation is registered with the GSTN 08AAATT6468P1ZL, is nonprofit organization. It’s headquarter is at Bengaluru and having establishments in 12 states across India. The applicant is serving meal to more than 17 lakhs students which are studying in 14000 Schools over in 12 states across the country. The applicant have rental income and the applicant is also registered under section 12AA (i.e. charitable trust) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The applicant strives to eliminate classroom hunger by implementing the Mid-Day meal scheme in the Government and Government aided schools. It also aims at countering malnutrition and supporting the right education of socio-economically disadvantaged Children. The applicant tries to banish hunger of the deprived economically backward and poor sections of the society and those hailing from rural area and slums in cities by every possible method, by providing free food. It seeks resort on whether Preparing and serving of food to children under Mid day meal and Anganwadi meals programme shall amount to Supply. Further sale of scrap items generated during mid day meal is covered under the scope of Supply or not.
Appellant’s contention:The appellant is operating 38 kitchens across 12 states in the country under the Guidelines wherein food grains and expenses for other ingredients, cooking cost and transportation expenses shall be reimbursed by the government. For each of the kitchen a MOU strictly as per the Guidelines of MHRD has been entered into with the respective authorities. Some important part of the Guidelines are extracted below which has a bearing on the question raised for advance ruling.
In Rajasthan a MOU entered with District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Jodhpur for serving Mid-Day meal to about 12000 Government school children dated 24th Oct 2016 which is valid for 3 years is enclosed. The key terms and conditions of the MOU which are important for the current context is mentioned below:
 1. Government would provide the Food Grains at an agreed quantum per child / meal for the expected average attendance in advance. Applicant shall provide the monthly report of details covering food grains received, utilized and balance in the prescribed format.
 2. For other food ingredients and conversion costs, Government would provide the cash conversion cost at agreed rates per child / meal.
3. To enable to reach nutritious, hygienically prepared quality meals to the children, applicant can raise donation, both in cash and kind to meet out deficit
4. All the additional expenses that may be required, on the preparation of the Mid-Day Meal as well as the transportation of the cooked meals to the schools in the project area shall be borne by the applicant
5. Menu will be in accordance as specified by the state Government from time to time
The applicant state that the above terms are mentioned commonly in all the MOUs entered into between the applicant with respective State Government. The copies of MOUs entered with Government of Gujarat for the implementing MDM program in Ahmedabad and with Government of Andhra Pradesh for implementing MDM program in Kuppam town provided with application as sample for reference.
The applicant raises funds by way of donation from Corporates, Trusts & Foundations and general public for meeting the expenditure incurred on Mid-Day meal program apart from free grains and food conversion cost received from government. The certified extract of official website of the applicant requesting for fund support from Donors is also enclosed, which shows the total cost, government subsidy and the deficit amount to be supported from donations.In course of providing Mid-Day Meal sometimes certain goods like spices, food grains, kitchen equipment and relevant spares (Boiler, Conveyor Belt Spares etc.), office equipment (Laptop, Computer, Stationery, Letter Head etc.), distribution vehicles are transferred from one kitchen of the applicant to another kitchen situated in a different state. It may be noted that the applicant has taken registration in various states for discharging GST liability on rental income and therefore they are 'distinct person' for the purpose of GST. During course of the activity of Mid-Day Meal, certain scrap in the form of empty oil & other tins, pipes & iron, empty bags, plastic items, cartoons, Flex & Boxes, spares parts of machine/equipment, vehicle & its parts like tyres etc. is generated which is sold from time to time. The sale proceeds of these items are recorded under the head 'miscellaneous income' in the books of accounts.
The applicant also carries out other charitable feeding programs such as Anganwadi feeding, wherein the part of the cost is met by Government Subsidy and the remaining cost is met through donations, private school feeding programs where entire 100% cost is met through donations. These programs are quite small in number and constitute about 10% of the total volume of meals. In none of the above programs, the applicant, charge/receive any money or consideration from the beneficiaries.

Reasoning of Judgement: The Respondent has undergone an analysis of the appellant’s contention that Subject to the provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2), the Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, specify, by notification, the transactions that are to be treated as,
  1. a supply of goods and not as a supply of services
 or
 (b) a supply of services and not as a supply of goods.
 Further, the definition of business under Section 2(17) of CGST Act includes,
 
 
(a) any trade, commerce, manufacture, profession, vocation, adventure, wager or any other similar activity, whether or not it is for a pecuniary benefit
 (b) any activity or transaction in connection with or incidental or ancillary to sub-clause (a); (c) any activity or transaction in the nature of sub-clause (a), whether or not there is volume, frequency, continuity or regularity of such transaction
 (d) supply or acquisition of goods including capital goods and services in connection with commencement or closure of business
 (e) provision by a club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration) of the facilities or benefits to its members
 (f) admission, for a consideration, of persons to any premises
(g) services supplied by a person as the holder of an office which has been accepted by him in the course or furtherance of his trade, profession or vocation
(h) services provided by a race club by way of totalisator or a licence to book maker in such club
(i) any activity or transaction undertaken by the Central Government, a State Government or any local authority in which they are engaged as public authorities;~ The word 'commerce' has several definitions which are as under:-As per Business Dictionary, it means exchange of goods or services for money or in kind, usually on a large scale enough to require transportation from place to place or across city, state or national boundaries.
In view of the above observations, the activity of preparation and serving of food under Mid Day Meal and Anganwadi meal programme undertaken by the applicant is covered under definition of business.
As per the documents submitted by the applicant They observe that the applicant is reimbursed as per the rate fixed by the Government of India or by the State Government for the transportation charges for lifting food grains from Food Corporation of India godown on basis of the release order.
It is further observed that the applicant is also paid /reimbursed of the cooking cost of the meals as per the instructions/norms of GOI / State Govt.
There is no exemption granted to charitable trusts in case of supply of goods which are taxable and are not specifically exempt or Nil rated. In case of exemption, a charitable trust is required to comply with certain conditions and the applicant is not covered in any of such activities.
The activities undertaken by the applicant under Mid-Day Meal Programme and Anganwadi meals programme is a supply in accordance with the Section 7 of CGST Act, 2017. However, MDM programme is taxed Nil by the virtue of Notification No. 12/2017 dated 28.06.2017 mentioned at serial number 66 heading number 9962.
The Preparation and serving of food under Government sponsored Anganwadi meals programme which is undertaken by the applicant who receives reimbursement from the government of Rajasthan @ Rs.5.40 per pregnant women/lactating & nursing mothers/adolescent girls and Rs. 5.25 per child per day. Therefore, the above said activity is against consideration and hence it is covered under the scope of 'supply' as per section 7 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017.
As the activity of 'transfer' is covered under definition of supply under section 7 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017. Thus, the transfer of goods / capital equipments, exclusively used for Mid-Day Meal (MDM) program and Anganwadi meals program sponsored by Government, between different kitchens of applicant which are 'distinct persons' as per GST law is covered under the scope of 'supply' as per section 7 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017.
The scrap items which generates during course of the activity of Mid-Day Meal in form of empty oil 86 other tins, pipes 86 iron, empty bags, plastic items, cartoons, Flex 8& Boxes, spare parts of machine / equipment, vehicle 8& its parts like tyres etc. are sold from time to time is for a consideration. The sale proceeds of these items are recorded under the head miscellaneous income in the books of records. The sale of scrap is an activity of sale for a consideration as mentioned in definition of 'supply' as per section 7 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017.
Decision:The activity of  Preparation and serving of food to children of government schools under Mid-Day meal Program of Government and serving of food under Government sponsored Anganwadi meals program is covered under the scope of 'supply'. Further the transfer of goods/ capital equipments for the programs carried out by the applicant sponsored by government is covered under the scope of Supply as per section 7 of CGST Act. And sale of scrap items generated during Mid day meal is as well covered under the scope of Supply.
Comment: The Gist of the case is that preparation and serving of food to children of government schools under mid day meal program and government sponsored Anganwadi meals are covered under the scope of Supply. Though the activities provided by the applicant is for charitable purposes registered under Section 12AA and for social cause but in order to be out of ambit of definition of supply it needs to satisfy the specified conditions.
 
Prepared by:Himanshu Bhimani
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com