Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law /2016-17/3239

Whether allegation of clandestine clearance can be made on basis of electricity consumption?

Case:-R.K. POLYTUBES VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAIPUR-I
 
Citation:- 2015(320) E.L.T. 813(Tri-Delhi)

Brief Facts:-Both the appeals are being disposed of by a common order as they arise out of same impugned order of Commissioner vide which he has confirmed the demand of duty of Rs. 69,74,004/- against M/s. R.K. Polytubes along with imposition of penalty of identical amount and confirmation of interest. In addition, he imposed penalty of Rs. 20 lakhs on M/s. Fairdeal Agencies who are traders in the goods manufactured by M/s. R.K. Polytubes.
 
As per facts on record M/s. R.K. Polytubes is engaged in the manufacture of PVC pipes and tubes. Their factory was visited by Central Excise officers on 16-2-1999, who conducted various checks and verifications. There was some shortages and excesses found in the stock of raw material and as also of their final product. The said shortages and excesses stand dealt by the Revenue by way of another show cause notice and are not the subject matter of present proceedings.
 
The officers also further scrutinized the records and resumed one private production register and a file from the factory itself. The said private production register relates to the goods manufactured during the period from 1-1-1999 to 16-2-1999. The officer also recorded statements of various persons and scrutinized records maintained by M/s. Fairdeal Agencies, a trading firm. It was found that M/s. Fairdeal Agencies have received much more quantum of goods than the quantum manufactured and reflected in the statutory records of M/s. R.K. Polytubes. Infact entries made in the ledger of M/s. Fairdeal Agencies did not reveal that goods received from M/s. R.K. Polytubes stand reflected therein but there were no corresponding entries in the statutory accounts of records of M/s. R.K. Polytubes. Further, the officers made inquiries from the raw materials supplied by M/s. Alpha Organics and M/s. Sigma Chemicals duly entered in their records by way of bills/invoices which was not entered in the appellant’s records.
 
The Revenue also verified the electricity consumed by the appellant during the entire period from 1997-1998 and 1998-1999 and found that there was excess consumption of electricity, thus leading to a charge on the part of the Revenue that appellant have manufactured excess quantum of their final product than what they have reflected in their statutory records. Inasmuch as the electricity consumption during the period from 1-1-1999 to 16-2-1999 showed by the other manufactures revealed excess production of their goods. Revenue on the same basis entertained a view that the production of the appellants should have been much more.
On the above basis, proceedings were initiated against the appellant for confirmation of demand of duty and for imposition of penalty. The said proceedings resulted in passing of order by the Commissioner vide which he confirmed the demand as proposed in the notice and imposed penalties on both the appellants.
 
Appellant’s Contention:-After hearing learned advocate Shri J.M. Sharma appearing for the appellant and Shri M.S. Negi, learned DR appearing for the respondent, we find that primarily the demands stand raised against the appellant on the following four counts.
1.    Private production register which was recovered during the search pertains to period 1-1-1999 to 16-2-1999;
2.    Stock ledger book of M/s. Fairdeal Agencies - a trading firm;
3.    Raw material supplied by M/s. Alpha Organics, Indore and Sigma Chemicals to the appellant supported by bill/invoices, etc.;
4.    The statement of Shri Ravi Gupta, partner of company.
Learned advocate is not disputing the confirmation of demand of duty based on private production register as also on stock ledger book of their trading firm as also of raw material supplied by the input supplier. His only grievance is in respect of demand confirmed on the basis of consumption of electricity, which has been arrived at by taking into account the total consumption of electricity during the relevant period and the electricity consumed during the period from 1-1-1999 to 16-2-1999 was inclusive of clandestine production as reflected in the private records. However, the learned advocate has strongly assailed the said part of the impugned order on the ground that same is based upon assumption and presumption. The consumption of electricity is dependent on number of factors like frequency of load shedding, type of goods produced, thickness and quality of PVC pipes, etc. The said consumption of electricity based upon various factors varies from one unit to another unit for same final product and has been held not to be sufficient evidence as held by various Courts and Tribunal [2009 (237) E.L.T. 674 (T)] in number of decisions. He relied upon the latest decision of the High Court of Allahabad in the case of CCE, Meerut I v. R.A. Castings Pvt. Ltd. [2011 (269) E.L.T. 337 (All.) = 2012 (26) S.T.R. 262 (All.)] as approved by Hon’ble Supreme Court as reported in[2011 (269) E.L.T. A108 (S.C.)]. As such, he submits that electricity consumption cannot be made the sole basis for confirmation of demand of duty. Inasmuch as there is no other evidence, he prays for setting aside the demand.
Respondent’s Contention:-Countering the arguments, learned DR submits that the appellant has already accepted that during the period from 1-1-1999 to 16-2-1999, they have indulged in clandestine production and clearance of goods, as reflected in private production register. Demand for the prior period has been confirmed by taking into account the admitted position of consumption of electricity during the period from 1-1-1999 to 16-2-1999. He further submits that appellant has himself admitted that he was receiving more goods than the goods reflected by them in their statutory records. This fact establishes that appellant was indulging in clandestine activity. Accordingly, he prays for rejection of the appeal.
 
Reasoning Of Judgment:- We have considered the submissions made by both sides. The appellants are not disputing the demands confirmed on the basis of entries made in the daily production records as also in the ledgers of the traders and also on the basis of raw materials supplied by the inputs supplier. The challenge in the present appeal is only to confirmation of demand on the basis of usage of electricity.
 
We find that apart from the electricity consumption, which according to the Revenue is much on the higher side when compared to the electricity consumed during the period 1-1-1999 to 16-2-1999, there is virtually no evidence against the appellant reflecting upon the excess production and clearance. We note that the clandestine removal is a serious charge against the assessee and inasmuch as the burden for the same is upon the Revenue, the same is required to be discharged by production of tangible and positive evidence. The contention of the learned DR that during the period 1-1-1999 to 16-2-1999, the appellants admittedly produced the higher quantum of their final products and the percentage of electricity consumption is based upon the said fact, may carry some weight leading to doubt against the assessee but the same cannot be held to be conclusive evidence so as to arrive at a finding against appellant. Merely because during the period in question the appellant was indulging in clandestine activities, would not ‘ipso facto’ lead to establish that they have been indulging in such activities even during the past period. To manufacture such a quantum of their final product, they need raw material and the actual production of the same and then the clandestine clearance to their buyers. The Revenue has neither established that as to who supplied the raw material to the appellant during the said longer period of two years. There is also no statement of any person actually doing the manufacturing activity so as to reveal that excess manufacture was done by them during the period. Further no buyer of the assessee stand identified by the Revenue. We also note that the statement of Shri Ravi Gupta only clarifies the position for the period from 1-1-1999 to 16-2-1999 and does not relate to clandestine activities for the past period. In the nutshell it can be said that there is virtually no evidence on record, except the electricity consumed, to establish the clandestine activity of the appellant.
 
We find that Tribunal in the case of M/s. R.A. Casting cited (supra) has considered the identical point and has categorically held that consumption of electricity, in the absence of any other corroboratory evidence, cannot be made the basis for arriving at the finding of clandestine manufacture and removal of goods. The said order stands affirmed by the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad and further does not stand admitted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. As such, we find that in terms of the said decision in the case of R.A. Castings, confirmation of demand of duty based upon the electricity consumption cannot be upheld. We hold accordingly.
 
Inasmuch as the appellants have accepted demands in respect of certain grounds, and inasmuch as bifurcation of such demand is not available before Tribunal, we remand the matter to the original adjudicating authority for quantifying the duty liability of the appellant along with the penal liability in terms of observations made and the findings arrived at.
 
Inasmuch as the matter is being remanded in respect of M/s. R.K. Polytubes, we deem it fit to leave the matter to the Commissioner to decide the penal liability of M/s. Fairdeal Agencies, trading unit. The appellants are at liberty to contest the said imposition on the facts and evidence as also on the legal issues.
 
Both the appeals are disposed of in the above terms.
 
Decision:-Appeals disposed off.

Comment:- The crux of the case is that consumption of electricity, in the absence of any other corroboratory evidence, cannot be made the basis for arriving at the finding of clandestine manufacture and removal of goods. The consumption of electricity is dependent on number of factors like frequency of load shedding, type of goods produced, thickness and quality of PVC pipes, etc. The said consumption of electricity based upon various factors varies from one unit to another unit for same final product and has been held not to be sufficient evidence as held by various Courts and Tribunal [2009 (237) E.L.T. 674 (T)] in number of decisions.
 
Prepared By: - Rakshay Tater
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com