Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2020-2021/3585

Whether activity of printing of question papers on behalf of educational institutions can be classified as activity of supply of goods or supply of services?
MAXWELL CO. PVT. LTD, 2020 (32) G. S. T. L. 545 (A. A. R. – GST – U.P.)
Brief Facts:-The applicant is in the business of confidential printing and supply of Board/University examination papers. It has filed an application for advance ruling to determine classification and taxability of printing of question papers under GST.
Issue:-Whether activity of printing of question papers on behalf of educational institutions can be classified as activity of supply of goods or supply of services?
Applicant Contention:-The contention of the Applicant is that the content of the printed matter is specific to the customer and the applicant does not have any ownership on the content at any point of time.
Reasoning of the Judgement:-The Authority observed that as per the provisions of the Circular 11/2017 and the business which is undertaken by applicant is printing of examination papers for Secondary and Higher Secondary Educational Boards as well as for State Universities. The content of the printed matter is specific to the customer and the applicant does not have any ownership on the content at any point of time. The question papers are not the property of the Applicant; hence, title of the above printed matters cannot be transferred. Those question papers are not marketable commodities in the open market. As the usage right of the material of question papers are owned by the Education Boards/ Educational Institutes and physical inputs used for printing belong to the applicant, printing of question paper constitutes supply of service classified under Heading 9989.
In case the services of printing of question papers are given to ‘educational institution’ which includes institutes providing pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent, education as a part of curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognized by any law for time being in force or education as a part of an approved vocational education course, then such services are exempt from GST. However, if services of printing of question paper are provided by the applicant institutions to other than ‘educational institutions’, then GST at the rate of 12% shall be applicable.
Decision:-The services of printing of question paper, supplied by the applicant to other than educational institutions will be covered by Sr. No. 27(i) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) and will attract Goods and Services Tax @ 12%.
Comment:-Since the printing of question papers is not marketable the said classification has been made under the service component as the principal supply fall under service category.  The AAR in case of M/s Department of Printing, Stationery and Publication held that these services are not eligible for GST exemption and 12% of GST is applicable on the activity of printing and supply of textbooks to government departments which are registered under GST Act. However, the authority clarified that in the case of the printing and supply of textbooks to government departments that are not registered under the GST Act, the applicant is exempted from the liability to pay tax.
Moreover, in AAR Ruling of Sukee Print Pack LLP relating to GST on Printing of books etc. for which materials are provided by customers, it was held that in the case where applicant is supplying the paper and paper board printed with content supplied by the recipient of the goods made using physical inputs including paper belonging to the recipient and –
a. If the final printed material is a book or a journal or a periodical and if the materials on which the printing is done are provided by the customers, then the activity would be covered under entry 26(i)(d) Notification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and would be liable to tax at 2.5% CGST plus 2.5% SGST.
b. If the final printed material is other than a book or a journal or a periodical but the involves the jobwork of printing of all goods falling under Chapter 48 or 49, which attract CGST @ 6 per cent, then the activity would be covered under entry 26(ia)(b) of Notification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and is liable to tax at 6% CGST plus 6% SGST.
c. If the jobwork of printing made on the materials belonging to other is not covered by the above two items, then the same is liable to be covered under Entry No. 26(iii) of Notification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended from time to time and is liable to tax at 9% CGST plus 9% SGST.
2. In the case where the paper and paper board along with content supplied by the recipient of the goods and the applicant prints the content on the paper and paper board supplied by the recipient of the goods by using the physical inputs belonging to the printer, then
a. If the supply of services is related to the printing of newspapers, books (including Braille books), journals and periodicals, then such supplies are taxable under entry no. 27(i) of Notification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended from time to time and is liable to tax at 6% CGST plus 6% SGST.
b. If the supply of service is related to the printing of materials other than newspapers, books (including Braille books), journals and periodicals, then such supplies are taxable under entry no. 27(ii) of Notification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended from time to time and is liable to tax at 9% CGST plus 9% SGST.

Prepared By- CA Kartik Singhvi
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com