Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-2017/3462

What would be the applicable GST rate and classification on the works contract service of maintenance of railway tracks?
Case: SREEPATI RANJAN GOPE & SONS
Citation: 2018 (12) G.S.T.L. 392 (A.A.R. - GST)
Issue:What would be the applicable GST rate and classification on the works contract service of maintenance of railway tracks?
Brief facts: - The Applicant, stated to be an enlisted contractor engaged by the Railways for maintenance work of railway tracks, wants a ruling on the Classification and Rate of Tax when maintenance of railways tracks is done by them by providing contractor’s labour only in cases where the Railways supply materials free of cost and when maintenance of railways tracks is done by them by providing, both, contractor’s material and labour.
AdvanceRuling is admissible on this question under Section 97(1)(a) of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the GST Act”).
Appellant’s contention: . During the course of Personal Hearing, on 21-3-2018, the Applicant submitted a photocopy of Letter of Acceptance, for the period 1-10-2017 to 30-9-2018, (hereinafter referred to as “LOA”) No. : T/Misc.P.Way (Zonal)/PWI-West/SRC/2017(e-30), dated 4-1-2018 issued from the Office of the DRM (Engg.), Kharagpur, along with the Schedules annexed thereto.
 
Judgement: The Adjudicating Authority contended that the Application, in Annexure C refers to a hyperlink: www.export-genius.in/gst-tax-rates/railway-track-maintenance-work which leads to information on the GST on HSN Code 8604 00 00 - Railway or Tramway Maintenance or Service Vehicles Whether or Not Self-propelled (for Example Workshops Cranes, Ballast Tampers, Track-liners, Testing Coaches and Track Inspection Vehicles. Since the Applicant is neither manufacturing nor supplying any such vehicle, the information available on the hyperlink is not relevant to the Applicant.
The Applicant is a supplier of services as per work order issued for execution by the Railways. From examination of the LOA and the annexed Schedules it is clear that the work to be executed involves repair, maintenance and fitting out of immovable property, namely, Railway Tracks, and also transfer of property in goods in course thereof. It is, therefore, a “Composite Supply” of labour and goods in the nature of Works Contract, as defined under Section 2(119) of the GST Act, and is, therefore, classifiable under (ii) of column 3 [Description of Service] of Heading 9954 (Construction Services) of Column 2 under Serial No. 3 of Column 1 of the Table in Notification No. 11/2017-C.T. (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 under the CGST Act, 2017 (1135-F.T., dated 28-6-2017 under the WBGST Act, 2017) - hereinafter collectively called Rate Notification. The Annexure: Scheme of Classification of Services appended with the said Notification No. further classifies Heading 9954 under Section 5 “Construction Services”. Group 9954 21 under Heading 9954 classifies “General Construction of civil engineering works” and Sub-group 9954 21 classifies “General Construction services of highways, streets, roads, railways and airfield runways, bridges and tunnels”. Sub-Group 9954 29 classifies “Services involving repair, alterations, additions, replacements, renovations, maintenance or remodelling of the constructions covered above”.
After a thorough perusal of the LOA it is seen that the Services rendered by the Applicant are to be classified under SAC (Service Code Tariff) Heading 9954, Group 9954 21, Sub-group 9954 29.
 The Rate Notification, along with its amendments on various dates, deals with the Tariff rate of tax as well as the effective rate of tax at reduced rates subject to specific laid down conditions. None of the amendments, whereby the effective rate of tax is at a rate lower than the Tariff rate under specifically laid down conditions are applicable in this case.
During Personal Hearing the Applicant has submitted a screenshot of GST rate of 5% for construction services for composite supply of works contracts involving predominantly earth work (that is, constituting more than 75% of the value of services provided, inter alia, to Central Government.
It appears that the Applicant is referring to amendment dated 13-10-2017 of the above mentioned Rate Notification. The LOA provides a detailed schedule of the nature of the work involved. It involves cleaning, surface preparation and painting of the rails, welding of joints, fabrication and fixing of guard rails, dressing and boxing of ballast, piling of Bullah, and other maintenance related work, only a minor fraction of which can be described as earth work. Hence, this amendment for effective rate of GST at reduced rates is not applicable in the instant case.
 During Personal Hearing the Applicant has referred to an exemption granted under Notification No. 12/2017-C.T. (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 under the CGST Act, 2017 (1136-F.T., dated 28-6-2017 under the WBGST Act, 2017) (hereinafter referred to as “the Exemption Notification”), and as amended on 25-1-2018. This argument is not present in the original application of Advance Ruling submitted on 7-2-2018. However, it is seen that the condition for being exempted from GST under this amendment requires the composite supply (wherein the value of the goods supplied is not more than 25% of the total value of the supply) to be provided, inter alia, to Central Government by way of any activity in relation to any function entrusted to a Panchayat under article 243G of the Constitution or in relation to any function entrusted to a Municipality under article 243W of the Constitution. Once again, the conditions laid down are not applicable to the instant case.
The works contract service of maintaining railway track as per the above LOA is, therefore, taxable @ 18% under the Serial No. 3(ii) of the Rate Notification.
Decision:The Applicant supplies works contract service, as defined under Section 2(119) of the GST Act, of maintaining existing railway tracks, which is taxable @ 18% under Serial No. 3(ii) of Notification No. 11/2017-C.T. (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 under the CGST Act, 2017 (1135-F.T., dated 28-6-2017 under the WBGST Act, 2017). The appropriate SAC (Service Code Tariff) is as follows: Heading 9954, Group 9954 21, Sub-group 9954 29.
2. This ruling is valid subject to the provisions under Section 103(2) until and unless declared void under Section 104(1) of the GST Act.
Comment: The gist of the case is Applicant supplies works contract service, of maintaining existing railway tracks, which is taxable @ 18% and the Notification dated 31.10.2017 attracting 5% shall not be applicable as it is subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. The appropriate SAC (Service Code Tariff) is as follows: Heading 9954, Group 9954 21, Sub-group 9954 29.

Prepared by:Himanshu Bhimani
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com