Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2013-14/2004

Unjust enrichment cannot apply on goods that are captively consumed.

Case:-MAHARASHTRA STATE POWER GENERATION CO. LTD. VERSUS C.C.(IMPORT), MUMBAI

Citation:-2013(298) E.L.T. 479 (Tri.-Mumbai)

Brief Facts:-The appellant filed this appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 235/2009/MCH/CRARS/09, dated 7-9-2009 whereby Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the lower adjudicating authorities order rejecting the refund claim of the appellant.
Briefly stated facts of the case are that the appellant filed Bill of Entry for import of Wheel Loader and classified the same under Chapter 87; subsequently the Bill of Entry was reassessed and the goods were classified under Chapter 84. Thereby the appellant filed refund claim for Rs. 1,90,585/- for excess duty paid. The lower adjudicating authority rejected the refund claim on the ground that the appellant failed to prove that they have not passed on the inci­dence of the duty.The appellant challenged the said order. The Ld. Commission­er (Appeals) upheld the lower authority's order and dismissed the appeal of the appellant. Hence the present appeal.

Appellant Contentions:-The contention of the appellant is that they are Government of Ma­harashtra State undertaking and they have not sold the capital goods to any of their customer. They will be utilizing the capital goods for power generation and the said electricity generator sold to another Government company i.e. M/s. Ma­harashtra State Power Distribution Co. Ltd. through Government's service Com­pany i.e. M/s. Maharashtra State Power Transmission Co. Ltd. and the electricity sold is not dutiable under Central Excise Tariff Act. Therefore, question that inci­dence of duty has been passed on does not arise. In support of their contention, they have cited the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of C.C.E., Bangalore-II v. Karnataka State Agro Corn Products Ltd.reported in2006 (202) E.L.T. 47 (Kar) and Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka decision in the case of Union of India v. Pharmacia India (P) Ltd.reported in2010 (256) E.L.T. 685 (Kar.)and this Tribunal decision in the case of Golden Iron & Steel Forgings v. Commr. of Cus., Mumbai reported in 2003 (157) E.L.T. 650 (Tri.-Del.).
 
Respondent Contentions:-The ld. JDR reiterated the findings of the ld. Commissioner.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:-We have carefully gone through the submissions and perused the rec­ords. Undisputedly the appellants are entitled for refund claim on merits. The refund has been denied on the question of unjust enrichment alone. The appel­lant is a State Government Undertaking and the goods imported are capital goods required for power generation. The Tribunal in the case of Golden Iron & Steel Forgings(supra) held that excess Customs duty paid on imported capital goods ultimately consumed by the importer, bar of unjust enrichment will not be applicable. The Hon'ble High Court in the case of Karnataka State Agro Corn Prod­ucts Ltd. (supra) while deciding the issue whether question of unjust enrichment is applicable to State undertakings held that unless the Department is able to show that the Government undertakings are totally different from all angles, it is not possible to accept the argument of 'unjust enrichment' on the part of the State undertakings. State and the State Government undertakings represent the people of the country. The Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pharmacia India (P) Ltd. (supra) the machinery which was imported by the assessee was for installation at its factory premises to be used for purpose of manufacture as captive consumption and not for further sale of the same, in which event, there would have been no occasion to collect the duty from its customer such being the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that refund claim was not hit by the rule of unjust enrichment. The above case laws apply to the facts of the case.

In view of the above, the ld. Commissioner (Appeals)'s order is not sustainable in law, hence set aside. Appeal allowed with consequential relief.
 
Decision:-Appeal allowed.

Comment:-The crux of this case is that as the imported goods were being transferred to another unit of the assessee for generation of electricity, being non excisable goods, it can be safely concluded that the imported goods have been captively consumed. Further, the unjust enrichment requires proving that the burden/incidence of duty is not passed on to third party. When the imported goods on which excess duty was paid have been captively consumed, the question of unjust enrichment does not arise and the refund is rightly admissible.
 

Comments

  • abhimanyu on 15 February, 2014 wrote:

    It is very good decision. I think that the officer of government use their authority to punish the public by cost. This is favorable decision for developement of industries who is producing electricity, which is very very accential for the public. Thank a lot for writing in your news letter such type of cases.

Post a Comment



Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com