Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2018-2019/3532

To understand the scope of the Definition of “Agricultural produce” in reference to the applicability of Notification No. 11/2017 and 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) to the Storage services that it provides
Case:M/s. Sardar Mal Cold Storage & Ice Factory
 
Citation:Advance ruling no: RAJ/AAR/2018-19/03
 
Issue:To understand the scope of the Definition of “Agricultural produce” in reference to the applicability of Notification No. 11/2017 and 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) to the Storage services that it provides.
 
Brief Facts:The applicant is the owner of the cold storage house and therefore provides storage and warehousing facilities to variety of agriculture produce.
 
Appellant’s Contention:The Applicant provides a detailed list of all the produce that it receives to provide storage services. However the applicant does not have surety as to whether the Produce that it receives would fall under the definition of Agricultural produce or not; thereby implying NIL rate of tax on the same. The applicant submit tables showing detailsof various produce and related processes done on them by the Farmers/ cultivators/ traders before the products comes for Storage purposes which are as follows:
 
 
Group A Fennel, Coriander, Mustard seeds, Poppy seeds etc
Group B Turmeric, Dried Ginger, Dates, Dry Dates.
Group C Tamarind
Group D Dry Mango, Kathodi, Dry Peas etc
Group E Cinnamon, Gum, ArjunaChaal
Group F Groundnuts, Copra Gola
Group G Fig, Almond, Walnuts etc
 
                 
 
Respondent’s Contention and Reasoning of Judgement:
 
As per the Relevant Notifications, Agricultural Produce should necessarily have three essential elements:
(a) It must be a produce out of cultivation of plant and rearing of all life forms of animals.
(b) It must be a produce on which no further processing is done or such processing is done as usually done by a cultivator or producer which does not alter its essential characteristics i.e. produce must broadly retain its physical and chemical form/constitution.
(c) Most importantly the processing done should be such as is usually done by a cultivator or producer which should only help it to attain marketability at primary market i.e. the definition limits the scope of processing and allows only those activities which helps the produces to attain the condition of its first marketability in primary market. After it attains the condition of first marketability the definition restricts all other further processes on the produce for further sale to be termed as ‘Agricultural Produce’.
Once the products attains its first marketability for the primary market all other subsequent processes on produce leading to value addition and subsequent sale belong to the realm of secondary market thereon refraining the produce to fall under the category of ‘Agricultural Produce’ as defined in Notification. The judgement has been made based on these conditions and based on above explanations, goods as per Groups are discusses as follows:
 
In case of Group A, Fennel (Saunf), Coriander (Dhaniya), Cumin Seeds (Jeera), Carom Seeds (Ajwain) ,Fenugreek Seeds(KasooriMethi), Mustard Seeds (Sarson), Brown Mustard Seeds (Rai),Nigella Seeds (Kalonji), Poppy Seeds (Posara Dana):
If no further processing is done on above mentioned goods or such processing is done as is usually done by a cultivator or producer which does not alter its essential characteristics but makes marketable for primary market then the same would fall in the definition of agricultural produce given in aforesaid Notification and exemption would be available. However if any processing is done on above products as is not usually done by a cultivator or producer at farm level such as cleaning, sorting, colour-sorting, grading, cutting, splitting, drying, packing etc. using specialized machine or equipments (as is not usually done by a cultivator or producer at farm level),then it will fall outside the definition of agricultural produce as given in the aforesaid Notification.
 
In case of Group B, Turmeric (Haldi), Dried Ginger (Sonth): Alter harvesting front fields the produce is brought to primary market (mandis) as fresh green/ raw turmeric and ginger where it is sold by farmers/cultivators. Further drying and polishing of them is a specialized process not usually carried out by cultivator who converts them into dry haldi (masala) and into dried ginger (Sonth. kirana item) hence changing the essential characteristic. Similarly dates and dry dates also after being sold in primary market go under specific process of soiling, cleaning, drying and polishing which is not usually done by cultivator. Hence processed goods mentioned in Group B do not belong to produce which are being sold in primary market and processes involved lead to considerable value addition indicating change in essential characteristics. Hence goods mentioned in Group B do not fall under the definition of’Agricultural Produce’.
 
In case of Group E, Cinnamon ( Dalchini), Gum (Gond), ArjunaChaal ( ArjunChaal):Cinnamon (Species) is obtained from the inner bark of a tree, species Genus CINNANOMUN. Immediately after harvesting the bark has to undergo a specific process involving hammering, scrapping, drying, cutting, fumigation,packing etc. These processes are done by skilled labour and nearly accounts for 60% costs of the final product. After harvesting these process are not done by farmers but are being done by skilled labour at specific plants set up to exctract bark from the branches harvested..
Gum (Gond): – Raw gum is collected by farmers or gum collectors from outer bark ot Acacia tree which after collection is sold in primary market. Later in industrial plants, raw gum is cleaned, refined, powered and made in granular form which is fit to be consumed in foods industries.
ArjunaChaal( ArjunChaal):- ArjunaChaal is got from tree, ArjunTrminalia. The bark also goes under certain processing before it is fit to be used in Ayurvedic Industries.Hence as per definition they too don’t fall under the category of Agricultural Produce.
 
Decision:
1. Goods mentioned under Group A fall under the definition of Agricultural Produce in terms of the aforesaid notification and so supply of cold storage service in relation to these is exempt from the levy of GST. However if any processing is done on these products as is not usually done by a cultivator or producer at farm level , then these would fall outside the definition of agricultural produce as given in the aforesaid Notification and in that case supply of cold storage service in relation to these would remain chargeable to GST.
2. Goods mentioned under Group B to G are not Agricultural produce in terms of the exemption notification and so the supply of cold storage service in relation to this would be chargeable to GST.
 
Comment: In the RARA UDHYOG-AAR Rajasthan(Advance Ruling No. RAJ/AAR/2018-19/06, dated 23-6-2018);
The applicant is engaged into the activities of cleaning of the various Agriculture produce like Saunf (Fennel) Dhaniya (Coriander), Jeera (Cumin seeds), etc. or the like goods which are brought to them by the farmers or by the traders. It was decided that there is a vast difference between the type of cleaning undertaken at the farm level by the farmer and that undertaken at the factory by specialized machines. In nutshell, the impugned process when undertaken at the factory level upgrades the marketability of the product to the level of the secondary market. The exemption notifications do not envisage such a refinement on the produce .Therefore, the benefit of aforesaid notifications was not extended to them and it was chargeable to GST.
In case of GURU COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD.(Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/RULING/2017-18/1, dated 13-12-2017), it was ruled thatProcessed spices including processed turmeric and processed ginger (soonth), are not agriculture produce as defined under Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate). However, groundnuts with shell, turmeric and ginger on which no further processing is done or such processing is done as is usually done by a cultivator or producer which does not alter its essential characteristics but make it marketable for primary market would fall within the definition of agriculture produce.
While in S.S.S.V.K. COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD.-Order No. AAR/AP/02(GST)/2018, dated 28-3-2018 in Application No. AAR/02(GST)/2018
, it was decided that the exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 under Entry No. 54(e) is applicable for agricultural produce of both farmers and traders.
This matter of classification as agriculture produce has always been a matter of litigation in the eyes of law. Continuous rulings enlighten the assessee to classify it properly taking into consideration – the marketability factor.
 
Prepared by: Adit Gupta
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com