Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2018-2019/3532

To understand the scope of the Definition of “Agricultural produce” in reference to the applicability of Notification No. 11/2017 and 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) to the Storage services that it provides
Case:M/s. Sardar Mal Cold Storage & Ice Factory
 
Citation:Advance ruling no: RAJ/AAR/2018-19/03
 
Issue:To understand the scope of the Definition of “Agricultural produce” in reference to the applicability of Notification No. 11/2017 and 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) to the Storage services that it provides.
 
Brief Facts:The applicant is the owner of the cold storage house and therefore provides storage and warehousing facilities to variety of agriculture produce.
 
Appellant’s Contention:The Applicant provides a detailed list of all the produce that it receives to provide storage services. However the applicant does not have surety as to whether the Produce that it receives would fall under the definition of Agricultural produce or not; thereby implying NIL rate of tax on the same. The applicant submit tables showing detailsof various produce and related processes done on them by the Farmers/ cultivators/ traders before the products comes for Storage purposes which are as follows:
 
 
Group A Fennel, Coriander, Mustard seeds, Poppy seeds etc
Group B Turmeric, Dried Ginger, Dates, Dry Dates.
Group C Tamarind
Group D Dry Mango, Kathodi, Dry Peas etc
Group E Cinnamon, Gum, ArjunaChaal
Group F Groundnuts, Copra Gola
Group G Fig, Almond, Walnuts etc
 
                 
 
Respondent’s Contention and Reasoning of Judgement:
 
As per the Relevant Notifications, Agricultural Produce should necessarily have three essential elements:
(a) It must be a produce out of cultivation of plant and rearing of all life forms of animals.
(b) It must be a produce on which no further processing is done or such processing is done as usually done by a cultivator or producer which does not alter its essential characteristics i.e. produce must broadly retain its physical and chemical form/constitution.
(c) Most importantly the processing done should be such as is usually done by a cultivator or producer which should only help it to attain marketability at primary market i.e. the definition limits the scope of processing and allows only those activities which helps the produces to attain the condition of its first marketability in primary market. After it attains the condition of first marketability the definition restricts all other further processes on the produce for further sale to be termed as ‘Agricultural Produce’.
Once the products attains its first marketability for the primary market all other subsequent processes on produce leading to value addition and subsequent sale belong to the realm of secondary market thereon refraining the produce to fall under the category of ‘Agricultural Produce’ as defined in Notification. The judgement has been made based on these conditions and based on above explanations, goods as per Groups are discusses as follows:
 
In case of Group A, Fennel (Saunf), Coriander (Dhaniya), Cumin Seeds (Jeera), Carom Seeds (Ajwain) ,Fenugreek Seeds(KasooriMethi), Mustard Seeds (Sarson), Brown Mustard Seeds (Rai),Nigella Seeds (Kalonji), Poppy Seeds (Posara Dana):
If no further processing is done on above mentioned goods or such processing is done as is usually done by a cultivator or producer which does not alter its essential characteristics but makes marketable for primary market then the same would fall in the definition of agricultural produce given in aforesaid Notification and exemption would be available. However if any processing is done on above products as is not usually done by a cultivator or producer at farm level such as cleaning, sorting, colour-sorting, grading, cutting, splitting, drying, packing etc. using specialized machine or equipments (as is not usually done by a cultivator or producer at farm level),then it will fall outside the definition of agricultural produce as given in the aforesaid Notification.
 
In case of Group B, Turmeric (Haldi), Dried Ginger (Sonth): Alter harvesting front fields the produce is brought to primary market (mandis) as fresh green/ raw turmeric and ginger where it is sold by farmers/cultivators. Further drying and polishing of them is a specialized process not usually carried out by cultivator who converts them into dry haldi (masala) and into dried ginger (Sonth. kirana item) hence changing the essential characteristic. Similarly dates and dry dates also after being sold in primary market go under specific process of soiling, cleaning, drying and polishing which is not usually done by cultivator. Hence processed goods mentioned in Group B do not belong to produce which are being sold in primary market and processes involved lead to considerable value addition indicating change in essential characteristics. Hence goods mentioned in Group B do not fall under the definition of’Agricultural Produce’.
 
In case of Group E, Cinnamon ( Dalchini), Gum (Gond), ArjunaChaal ( ArjunChaal):Cinnamon (Species) is obtained from the inner bark of a tree, species Genus CINNANOMUN. Immediately after harvesting the bark has to undergo a specific process involving hammering, scrapping, drying, cutting, fumigation,packing etc. These processes are done by skilled labour and nearly accounts for 60% costs of the final product. After harvesting these process are not done by farmers but are being done by skilled labour at specific plants set up to exctract bark from the branches harvested..
Gum (Gond): – Raw gum is collected by farmers or gum collectors from outer bark ot Acacia tree which after collection is sold in primary market. Later in industrial plants, raw gum is cleaned, refined, powered and made in granular form which is fit to be consumed in foods industries.
ArjunaChaal( ArjunChaal):- ArjunaChaal is got from tree, ArjunTrminalia. The bark also goes under certain processing before it is fit to be used in Ayurvedic Industries.Hence as per definition they too don’t fall under the category of Agricultural Produce.
 
Decision:
1. Goods mentioned under Group A fall under the definition of Agricultural Produce in terms of the aforesaid notification and so supply of cold storage service in relation to these is exempt from the levy of GST. However if any processing is done on these products as is not usually done by a cultivator or producer at farm level , then these would fall outside the definition of agricultural produce as given in the aforesaid Notification and in that case supply of cold storage service in relation to these would remain chargeable to GST.
2. Goods mentioned under Group B to G are not Agricultural produce in terms of the exemption notification and so the supply of cold storage service in relation to this would be chargeable to GST.
 
Comment: In the RARA UDHYOG-AAR Rajasthan(Advance Ruling No. RAJ/AAR/2018-19/06, dated 23-6-2018);
The applicant is engaged into the activities of cleaning of the various Agriculture produce like Saunf (Fennel) Dhaniya (Coriander), Jeera (Cumin seeds), etc. or the like goods which are brought to them by the farmers or by the traders. It was decided that there is a vast difference between the type of cleaning undertaken at the farm level by the farmer and that undertaken at the factory by specialized machines. In nutshell, the impugned process when undertaken at the factory level upgrades the marketability of the product to the level of the secondary market. The exemption notifications do not envisage such a refinement on the produce .Therefore, the benefit of aforesaid notifications was not extended to them and it was chargeable to GST.
In case of GURU COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD.(Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/RULING/2017-18/1, dated 13-12-2017), it was ruled thatProcessed spices including processed turmeric and processed ginger (soonth), are not agriculture produce as defined under Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate). However, groundnuts with shell, turmeric and ginger on which no further processing is done or such processing is done as is usually done by a cultivator or producer which does not alter its essential characteristics but make it marketable for primary market would fall within the definition of agriculture produce.
While in S.S.S.V.K. COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD.-Order No. AAR/AP/02(GST)/2018, dated 28-3-2018 in Application No. AAR/02(GST)/2018
, it was decided that the exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 under Entry No. 54(e) is applicable for agricultural produce of both farmers and traders.
This matter of classification as agriculture produce has always been a matter of litigation in the eyes of law. Continuous rulings enlighten the assessee to classify it properly taking into consideration – the marketability factor.
 
Prepared by: Adit Gupta
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com