Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2018-2019/3534

To determine applicability of GST on sale or purchase of DFIA (Duty Free Import Authorizations)
Name-M/S Spaceage Syntex Pvt Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Citation- GST-ARA- 13/2018-19/B-86  dated 06.08.2018
Issue- To determine applicability of GST on sale or purchase of DFIA (Duty Free Import Authorizations)
Submissions By Applicant-The applicant has submitted that both Duty Credit Scrips and DFIAs are issued as export incentive and therefore it does not matter that the Duty Credit Scrip can be used for payment specified duties and under DFIA it is duty remission. The applicant has also submitted that the GST Council had observed that the duty credit scrips such as MEIS was losing value due to its reduced usability as it could no longer be used to pay IGST / GST. Hence it clearly appears that it was only the duty credit scrips which were loosing their value and not DFIA because DFIA does not envisage payment of duty at all. DFIA is connected with duty free imports. This is definitely a major difference between the two. The applicant has also submitted that to restore the lost incentive on sale of duty credit scrips, it was proposed by the Council that the GST on sale purchase of these duty credit scrips was being reduced from 5% to 0%.  
     
Contentions by Department- Duty Credit Scrips and DFIAs are not one and the same or similar at all. They are different incentives given to exporters with different conditions and have been separately defined and explained in different Chapters of the FTP. Even though both are an incentive to exporters to promote and increase exports from the country, both the schemes are used in different circumstances and in different manner. When the FTP itself has segregated the two in different Chapters with different procedures, it would not be proper to consider the two schemes as one and the same and therefore we differ with the views of the applicant on this issue. Hence we find that DF1A is distinguishable from ‘Duty Credit Scrips’ and cannot be considered as a Duty Credit Scrip as envisaged under the Serial No. 122A of Notification 1/2017 Central Tax (Rate) inserted vide Notification No.35/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 13.10.2017 even though it falls under CTH 4907. Hence we find that DFIA though will fall under Chapter 4907 and attract applicable GST as exemption is in respect of only Duty Credit Scrips. The Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra held that this transaction is not exempt from GST.
The appellant filed an appeal to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra.  
     
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra observed that meaning of DFIA is not given as per GST law. However, as per Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20, DFIA is the instrument to give incentives to importers which entitles them to import goods specified without payment of customs duty. Even though duty credit scrips and DFIA have been given under different chapters and different schemes, yet the basic nature and functionality of both the instruments are same, i.e., to set-off Basic Customs Duty on the import of goods.  
     
 As per rate notification under GST, ‘Duty Credit Scrips’ are exempted from GST. *The duty credit scrips and DFIA are same as per trade parlance* and, hence, the tax treatment shall also be same.  
 Therefore, the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra set aside the ruling of AAR and held that GST shall not be applicable on buying/selling of DFIA which are nothing but Duty Credit Scrips.
GST - DFIA, also popularly known as duty paying scrips in the trade parlance is equivalent to the duty credit scrips, insofar as the tax treatment thereon is concerned and accordingly there will be Nil rate of GST on the sale or purchase of DFIA as provided in Sr. no. 122 of Notification 02/2017-CTR - Board Circular dated 06.06.2018 has while clarifying the issue of classification of various certificates and scrips and taxability thereon has used the word ‘duty paying scrips' and ‘duty credit scrips' interchangeably - AAAR is compelled to interpret that both the words ‘duty paying scrips' and ‘duty credit scrips' are one and the same - AAR ruling set aside and appeal allowed: AAAR
- Appeal allowed: AAAR
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com