Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2018-2019/3534

To determine applicability of GST on sale or purchase of DFIA (Duty Free Import Authorizations)
Name-M/S Spaceage Syntex Pvt Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Citation- GST-ARA- 13/2018-19/B-86  dated 06.08.2018
Issue- To determine applicability of GST on sale or purchase of DFIA (Duty Free Import Authorizations)
Submissions By Applicant-The applicant has submitted that both Duty Credit Scrips and DFIAs are issued as export incentive and therefore it does not matter that the Duty Credit Scrip can be used for payment specified duties and under DFIA it is duty remission. The applicant has also submitted that the GST Council had observed that the duty credit scrips such as MEIS was losing value due to its reduced usability as it could no longer be used to pay IGST / GST. Hence it clearly appears that it was only the duty credit scrips which were loosing their value and not DFIA because DFIA does not envisage payment of duty at all. DFIA is connected with duty free imports. This is definitely a major difference between the two. The applicant has also submitted that to restore the lost incentive on sale of duty credit scrips, it was proposed by the Council that the GST on sale purchase of these duty credit scrips was being reduced from 5% to 0%.  
     
Contentions by Department- Duty Credit Scrips and DFIAs are not one and the same or similar at all. They are different incentives given to exporters with different conditions and have been separately defined and explained in different Chapters of the FTP. Even though both are an incentive to exporters to promote and increase exports from the country, both the schemes are used in different circumstances and in different manner. When the FTP itself has segregated the two in different Chapters with different procedures, it would not be proper to consider the two schemes as one and the same and therefore we differ with the views of the applicant on this issue. Hence we find that DF1A is distinguishable from ‘Duty Credit Scrips’ and cannot be considered as a Duty Credit Scrip as envisaged under the Serial No. 122A of Notification 1/2017 Central Tax (Rate) inserted vide Notification No.35/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 13.10.2017 even though it falls under CTH 4907. Hence we find that DFIA though will fall under Chapter 4907 and attract applicable GST as exemption is in respect of only Duty Credit Scrips. The Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra held that this transaction is not exempt from GST.
The appellant filed an appeal to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra.  
     
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra observed that meaning of DFIA is not given as per GST law. However, as per Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20, DFIA is the instrument to give incentives to importers which entitles them to import goods specified without payment of customs duty. Even though duty credit scrips and DFIA have been given under different chapters and different schemes, yet the basic nature and functionality of both the instruments are same, i.e., to set-off Basic Customs Duty on the import of goods.  
     
 As per rate notification under GST, ‘Duty Credit Scrips’ are exempted from GST. *The duty credit scrips and DFIA are same as per trade parlance* and, hence, the tax treatment shall also be same.  
 Therefore, the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra set aside the ruling of AAR and held that GST shall not be applicable on buying/selling of DFIA which are nothing but Duty Credit Scrips.
GST - DFIA, also popularly known as duty paying scrips in the trade parlance is equivalent to the duty credit scrips, insofar as the tax treatment thereon is concerned and accordingly there will be Nil rate of GST on the sale or purchase of DFIA as provided in Sr. no. 122 of Notification 02/2017-CTR - Board Circular dated 06.06.2018 has while clarifying the issue of classification of various certificates and scrips and taxability thereon has used the word ‘duty paying scrips' and ‘duty credit scrips' interchangeably - AAAR is compelled to interpret that both the words ‘duty paying scrips' and ‘duty credit scrips' are one and the same - AAR ruling set aside and appeal allowed: AAAR
- Appeal allowed: AAAR
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com