Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2012-13/1058

Service tax with interest paid before issuance of SCN - there was no requirement of issuing SCN

Case: SARASWATI ENGINEERING Versus COMMR. OF CUS. C. EX. & S.T., NAGPUR
 
Citation: 2011 (24) S.T.R. 298 (Tri. - Mumbai)
 
Issue:- When service tax with interest is paid before issuance of SCN voluntarily then no SCN should be issued.
 
Brief Facts:- Appellant is a small-scale contractor engaged in pro­viding Maintenance and Repair Services and holds Service Tax Registration. During the period from April to September, 2007 appellant provided the said services to M/s. Manikgarh Cement. The value of the taxable service so provided amounted to Rs. 19,11,058/-. The service tax payable thereon amounted to Rs. 1, 98,724/-. The appellant collected service tax from the recipient of the service but did not remit the same immedi­ately to the credit of the Revenue. The appellant paid an amount of Rs. 83,820/- towards service tax on 21-8-2007 and paid the balance amount of Rs. 1,14,904/- on 5-5-2008. The appellant also discharged the interest amount of Rs. 10,049/- for the late payment of service tax. The appellant filed the service tax return for the said period on 9-5-2008 after a lapse of about 6 months and was directed to pay the late fee of Rs. 2,000/- for the delayed filing, which was also paid by the ap­pellant.
 
The jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner issued a show-cause no­tice alleging non-payment of service tax for the said period and also proposing imposition of penalties under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Fi­nance Act, 1994. The appellant did not file any reply to the show-cause notice.
 
Therefore, the Adjudicating Authority passed an ex-parte order dated 30-3-2009 wherein he confirmed the service tax amount of Rs. 1,98,724/-, interest on the said amount under Section 75 and imposed an equivalent amount of penalty both under Section 76 and under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and a further penalty of Rs. 1,000/- under Section 77.
 
Appellant is in appeal before the Tribunal.
 
Appellant’s Contention:- Appellant submits that in spite of the submissions made before the Lower Appellate Authority that in view of the provisions of sub-section (3) of Section 73, no notice could have been issued on the appellant and no penalty could have been imposed, the Lower Appellate Author­ity did not consider this plea and merely confirmed the order of the lower Adju­dicating Authority. When the show-cause notice itself is not maintainable in view of the above provisions of law, the orders of the Adjudicating and Appellate Au­thorities are bad in law and not sustainable.
 
Respondent’s Contention:- Revenue reiterates the findings given by the lower authorities. However, they fairly concedes that the appellate authority has not given any finding on the pleas made by the appellant and, therefore, the matter be sent back to the lower appellate authority for reconsideration.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:- The Tribunal noted that from the records it is seen that the appellant had discharged the service tax liability of Rs. 1,98,724/- along with interest thereon well before the issue of show-cause notice. They had also paid the late fee of Rs. 2,000/- for the delayed filing of the service tax return.
 
The Tribunal perused the provisions of Section 73 and noted that a plain reading of the Section 73 makes it abundantly clear that if the assessee has discharged the service tax liability on his own ascertain­ment or on the basis of ascertainment by the Central Excise officers and informed the Central Excise officer of payment of such service tax then, no notice under sub-section (1) in respect of the amount so paid shall be served. In the instant case, the assessee discharged the tax liability for the period April to September, 2007 in August 2007 and May 2008. Interest amounting to Rs. 10,049/- was paid on 5-5-2008. They had filed the return due on 25-10-2007 by 9-5-2008. They also paid the late fee of Rs. 2,000/- for the delayed filing of the return as per the in­structions of the officer who received the return. The above conduct of the assessee makes it abundantly clear that there was no willful mis-statement or sup­pression of fact on the part of the assessee. Therefore, the provisions of sub­section (3) of Section 73 is clearly attracted in the facts of the case and issuance of a show-cause notice for demand of service tax and imposition of penalties was not at all warranted.
 
Appellant is only challenging the imposition of penalties and not any other amount paid. In view of the above legal provisions Tribunal held that the imposition of penalties under Sections 76, 77 and 78 in this case was not at all warranted. Order is set aside.
 
Decision:- Appeal allowed accordingly.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com