Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2020-2021/3556

Rate of tax on the services to be provided and the applicability of entry No.69 or 72 of the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 on the sub contractor.
 
M/s M V Infra Services Pvt. Ltd KAR ADRG 04/2020 dated 17.02.2020
Brief Facts: -The appellant is engaged in provision of composite works contract services of erection, foundation, electrical works & painting of communication towers and their maintenance. They are expected to get sub contract work, of imparting training of soft skill development to Engineers, ITI students, Building and other construction workers, from the main contractor exclusively engaged in skill development training & are likely to get the main contract work.
Issues: -Rate of tax on the services to be provided and the applicability of entry No.69 or 72 of the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 on the sub contractor.
Appellant Contention: -The applicant contends that the total expenditure of the said training programme is to be borne by the Government under its flagship Skill Development Mission; they, though under sub-contract, will be providing services to Maharashtra State Skill Development Society, Skill Development & Entrepreneurship Department, Government of Maharashtra in a "bill to-ship to" model; the services of main contractor are exempted under entry No.72 of the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and the applicant, through the main contractor, will be providing the same services to the Government of Maharashtra and hence the said services, to be provided by the applicant under sub-contract, also should be exempted.
The applicant intends to rely on the order passed by Madhya Pradesh Advance Ruling Authority in the case of M/s. Network For Information & Computer (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) dated. 10-04-2019, wherein applicant is engaged in Commercial Training 8s Coaching and business auxiliary services provided to Uttar Pradesh Skill development Corporation, through which they train the youth of Uttar Pradesh for gainful employment of the candidates, is being exempted from the payment of taxes vide SI. No. 72 of the Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated 28th June, 2017.
Entry No.72 of the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 exempts services provided to the State Government under any training programme for which total expenditure is borne by the State Government. In the instant case, the impugned training programme is hosted by the State Government of Maharashtra and hence the services provided under the said programme are exempt and accordingly main contractor is eligible for exemption.
The applicant intend to rely on the Advance Ruling given by this authority in the case of M/s Quatro Rail Tech Solutions Ltd., and also the ruling in the case of M/s NHPC Ltd., issued by the Advance Ruling Authority, State of Uttarakhand.
Reasoning of Judgement: -
Entry No.69 exempts the services, covered under Service Code 9991 or 9992 or 9983, provided by
(a) the National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC) set up by Government of India,
(b) a Sector Skill Council (SSC) approved by the NSDC,
(c) an assessment agency approved by the SSC or NSDC,
(d) a training partner approved by NSDC or SSC; in relation to
(i) National Skill Development Programme implemented by NSDC, or
(ii) a vocational skill development course under the National Skill Certification and Monetary Reward Scheme; or
(iii) any other scheme implemented by NSDC.
In the instant case, the tender has been called by Maharashtra State Skill Development Society, Skill Development and Entrepreneurship Department, Government of Maharashtra which is neither NSDC nor a SSC. The tender was meant for empanelment of "Training Providers". The applicant has not furnished any documentary evidence so as to arrive at whether the main contractor qualifies to be a training partner, approved by either NSDC or SSC, or not. Further the training providers are not entitled for exemption under the entry No.69. Therefore the main contractor, in case if they get the said work, would not be entitled for exemption under this entry for the said work.
Entry No. 72, of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, which exempts the services, covered under Service Code 9992, provided to the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory Administration under any training programme for which total expenditure is borne by the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory Administration. In the instant case, the main contractor, if they get the work, would be providing service, of training for Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) to construction workers, to the Government of Maharashtra, for which total expenditure is to be borne by the Government of Maharashtra. Therefore the main contractor would be eligible for exemption under entry No.72 of the said notification, subject to fulfillment of the aforesaid conditions.
The last issue was whether the aforesaid exemption that is applicable to the main contractor is applicable to the applicant or not. The conditions for the entitlement of the said exemption are as under:-
a) The services must be related to/ under any training programme.
b) The services must be provided to the Central Government, State Government and Union Territory Administration.
c) The total expenditure for the said training programme must be borne by Central Government, State Government and Union Territory Administration.
In the instant case though the services to be provided by the applicant would be under training programme for Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) to construction workers, the services would be provided to the Main Contractor i.e. the recipient of the services would be the Main contractor, but not the State Government.
Therefore, the rate of 18% GST is applicable on services to be provided under sub-contract to main contractor, who in turn provides to M/s Maharashtra State Skill Development Society (MSSDS), in respect of training of Building and other construction workers (skill development training) and the SI. No. 69 or SI. No. 72 of the notification 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) New Delhi, dated 28th June, 2017 are not applicable to the applicant.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com