Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/13-14/2067

Penalty under section 11AC cannot be imposed in every case of default.

Case:- COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, SALEM V/S CROCODILE (I) PVT. LTD.
 
 
Citation:- 2013 (297) E.L.T. 363 (Mad.)
 
 
Brief Facts:- The assessee is the manufacturer of readymade garments falling under Chapter sub heading 62.01 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. After communicating with the jurisdictional Superintendent and after considering the reply, the Revenue held that credit taken to a sum of Rs. 1507414/-, was in excess of the admissible credit. However, subsequently, the assessee reversed the wrongful credit taken and paid the duty thereon. Evidently, this was before the issuance of show cause notice. Thus, though the original notice issues on 16.04.2004 proposed levy of interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and penalty under Rule 13 (1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, on the above facts, the Assistant Commissioner dropped the proposal on the levy of interest and penalty. On appeal by the Revenue, by virtue of the powers under Section 35E (2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, the Commissioner reversed the order of the Assistant Commissioner. He proposed the imposition of penalty under Rule 13 (1) of the Cenvat credit Rules, 2002 and interest under Rule 12 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. The assessee objected to this that the notice failed to point out how the penal provisions were attracted in the case, more so in the context of payment of the duty even before the issue of the notice in terms of Section 11A (2B) of Central Excise Act, 1944. A cursory reading of the notice shows that except for mere reference to the proposal to levy penalty under Section 13(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, there is no discussion as regards the various requirements which are necessary for the purpose of levy of penalty under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944. A reading of the order of the commissioner shows that he confirmed the levy of penalty observing that the reversal of the credit made by the assessee after detection of the case clearly established the intention to cause wrongful gain warranting imposition of penalty. Thus, even if any credit was reversed before the issuance of show cause notice, it being made after the detection, penalty was leviable under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944. Thus, ultimately the Commissioner confirmed his proposal to levy of penalty of Rs. 150000/- under Rule 13 of the Cenvat credit Rules, 2002 and confirmed the levy of interest at Rs. 124150/-.
Aggrieved by this, the assessee went on appeal before the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. Considering the merits of the case, the Tribunal found that the assessee reversed the credit on 23-10-2003 after getting intimation from the department as to the admissibility of the claim. In terms of Rule 12 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, the assessee was rightly asked to pay the interest. However, it was also an admitted fact that the assessee did not utilise the credit and reversed immediately on receipt of the intimation about the error. In the circumstances, in the absence of any other material to show the intent to cause wrongful gain as required under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, the levy of penalty was cancelled by the Tribunal. Aggrieved by this, the present appeal by the Revenue.
Appellant’s Contention:-The appellants placed reliance on the decision reported in 2009 (238) ELT 3 (SC) Union of India v. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills and submitted that for the detection by them, the assessee would not have reversed the entry. In the circumstances, going by section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, and on the facts, the levy of the penalty under section 11 AC is liable to be imposed. 
 
Respondent’s Contention:-The Respondents submitted that they have availed cenvat credit on the basis as had been stated so by the department. However, subsequently, on receipt of intimation from the department in October 2003, they reversed the credit immediately thereon and paid the duty. In these circumstances, no penalty is warranted.  
 
Reasoning of Judgment:- The Hon’ble Tribunal held that the assessee reversed the credit on 23.10.2003 after getting intimation from the department as to the admissibility of the claim. In terms of Rule 12 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, the assessee was rightly asked to pay the interest. However, it was also an admitted fact that the assessee did not utilize the credit and reversed immediately on receipt of the intimation about the error. In the circumstances, in the absence of any other material to show the intent to cause wrongful gain as required under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, the levy of penalty was cancelled by them.
Further, they held that they do not agree with the submission of the Revenue. The decision of the Apex Court reported in 2009 (231) ELT 3 (SC) Union of India v. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills referred to the decision of the Apex Court reported in 2008 (231) ELT 3 (SC) Union of India v. Dharamendra Textile Processors, wherein, the Apex Court pointed out that the application of Section 11AC would depend upon the existence or otherwise of the conditions expressly stated in the section, once the section is applicable, the concerned authority would have no discretion in quantifying the amount and penalty must be imposed equal to the duty determined under sub section (2) of Section 11A. In so holding, the Apex Court held that in every case of non-payment or short payment of duty, penal provisions cannot be automatically invoked, in other words, the conduct of the assessee in each of the case, before imposing penalty, has to be looked at on the bona fides of the assessee as regards his claim which otherwise would not be sustained in law.
Further, they held that as far as the present case is concerned, it is no doubt true that the assessee originally made the claim for Cenvat credit. As rightly submitted by the assessee, the same was availed on the basis what had been stated so by the department. However, subsequently, on receipt of intimation from the department in October 2003, the assessee reversed the credit immediately thereon and paid the duty. In the background of the said facts, they may look into the show cause notice issued by the adjudicating authorities well as by the commissioner. On a reading of the show cause notice, they can safely hold that it does not states any details or makes allegations which are required to be considered for the purpose of levy of penalty under Rule 13 (1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. In the absence of any specific ground alleged, they do not find any justifiable ground to disturb the order of the Tribunal. Applying the law declared by the Apex court in the decision reported in 2009 (238) ELT 3 (SC) Union of India v. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills, they rejected the appeal filed by the Revenue.
 
Decision:- The appeal was rejected.
 
 
Comment:-The crux of this case is that the mandatory penalty under section 11AC is imposed only when the ingredients of fraud, willful misstatement, suppression of facts etc. are present. When there is no allegation of any willful misstatement or suppression of facts, mandatory penalty cannot be levied on the assessee. 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com