Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ//Case Laws/2011-12/1407

Penalty under Section 11AC
Case: MARKFED HDPE SACKS PLANT. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., LUDHIANA
 
Citation: 2011 (271) E.L.T. 396 (Tri. - Del.)
 
Issue:- Penalty under Section 11AC – imposition of – justified when suppression clearly established. 
 
Brief Facts:- Appellants herein were engaged in the manufacture of HDPE woven sack/bags, HDPE cover sheets, HDPE tape and HDPE fabrics classifiable under Tariff Heading No. 3923 and 3920 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It was noticed during audit that the appellant had received back 2616 rejected LDPE cap covers from their branch offices. Those goods were manufactured by the appellants. The process of manufacture was joining the ends of bought out LDPE films received from M/s Essen Multipack Ltd by heat and press treatment and fixing of eyelets. At the time of receipt of the film, Cenvat credit on those LDPE film was availed by the appellants. Accordingly, duty was paid on clearance of these goods after manufacture. Some of those goods were received back without any cenvatable document issued by the branch offices under cover of challans issued by those branches. Appellants on receipt of the said goods removed the top cover/portion of the LDPE cap covers and replaced LDPE film therein with newly bought out LDPE film procured from the manufacturer of LDPE film. The said film for the purpose of re‑placement was purchased by the appellants on payment of duty and cenvat credit in respect thereof was also availed. After repairing the LDPE cap cover, the goods were sent back to the respective branches. However, the LDPE cap covers received thereof was also availed. After repairing the LDPE covers received subsequent to that period, cenvat credit was availed on the strength of self invoices and the same were cleared after payment of duty at the same value on which they were initially cleared.
 
Department issued show cause notice and confirmed the demand of duty with interest and imposed penalty of Rs. 8.5 lakhs. The matter came before the Tribunal. The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed to One Lakh.
 
The appeal was filed before the High Court. The High Court remanded the matter to decide the issue relating to 100% penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The High Court had observed that there was no finding of suppression on the part of appellant. Once there is a finding that the matter falls under Section 11AC, penalty had to be minimum. In the absence of finding to that effect, penalty was not justified. Accordingly, the order of the Tribunal on the issue of penalty was set aside.

Thus, the issue is again before the Tribunal on the issue of penalty.
 
Appellant’s Contention:- Appellant argued that the imposition of penalty was in relation to the issue pertaining to the admissibility of the cenvat credit in respect of inputs utilised in repairs of the rejected goods which were cleared at the same price. Referring to Rule 16 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, Appellants submitted that the authorities below erred in applying the provisions of sub-rule (2) of Rule 16 when, in fact, the authority ought to have applied the provisions of sub-rule (1).
 
The Tribunal in the appellant's own case under order dated 28-3-2008 has clearly held that in the absence of material showing any positive intention on the part of the appellants which is a Government undertaking, to evade duty or unless there is a case of fraud, collusion etc., imposition of penalty is not justified and considering the same, there cannot be any justification for imposition of any penalty.
 
Respondent’s Contention:- Revenue submitted that no fault can be found with the finding arrived at by the authority below in relation to the obligation of the appellants while availing Cenvat credit.
 
Revenue placing reliance in the matter of Union of India v. Dharamendra Textile Processors [2008 (231) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) and Union of India v. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills [2009 (238) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.)]  submitted that the proceedings in the case in hand were initiated by invoking the extended period of limitation under Section 11AC and the finding in that regard had attained finality and the factum of suppression of facts also stand established and therefore, the provisions of Section 11AC in relation to the penalty are clearly attracted.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:- The earlier order of the Tribunal was perused wherein it was recorded that on merits of the case, it was admitted fact that the appellants were undertaking repair of the goods which were cleared on payment of duty and they were using some inputs on which credit has been taken for repair only. It is a well settled law that repair is not a manufacturing activity and the credit can only be availed in respect of the inputs which are used in the manufacture of excisable goods. No infirmity was found in the original order where the input credit was denied on the ground that record the inputs are used only for repair purposes.
 
The Tribunal observed that as this order was not challenged, the said order had attained finality.
 
With regard to the issue of suppression and bar of limitation, the Tribunal perused the finding of the Adjudicating Authority and held that finding relating to suppression resulting in invocation of extended period of limitation was not challenged and had attained finality.
 
With regard to applicability of Rule 16 (1), it was held that the contention in this regard is not sustainable as the contention in this regard was not raised before the Adjudicating Authority and before the Tribunal. It was held that Rule 16 (1) provided that where any goods on which duty has been paid at the time of removal thereof are brought to any factory for being remade, refined, reconditioned etc, the assessee shall state the particulars of such receipts in his records and shall be entitled to take cenvat credit of the duty paid as if such goods are received as inputs under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 and utilize the same according to Cenvat Credit Rules. And the Cenvat Credit Rules nowhere permit utlisation of credit when the final product is exempt from payment of duty or the process undertaken does not amount to manufacture. Besides, Rule 16 (1) which is confined to the activity “remaking, refining, reconditioning”. And the expression “for any other reason” has to be read without forgetting principle of ejusdem generis.
 
It was noted that sub-rule (2) contains all the situations not covered by sub-rule (1) of Rule 16. It was noted that Rule 16 (2) provided that even though manufacturer on return of the goods seeks to avail of cenvat credit, he will have to pay the amount equal to such credit in case a process under which the returned product undergoes does not amounts to manufacture.
 
On the facts of present case, it was noted that admittedly, returned goods did not undergo any process of manufacture. Rule 16 (2) was attracted. It was further held that bona fide belief could be of a living person and not of a non-living person. It was noted that the identity of the living person having bona fide belief was not disclosed by the appellant. Accordingly, it was held that suppression was clearly established and the bona fide belief was not present. Therefore, the equal penalty under Section 11AC was applicable. 
 
Decision:- Appeal dismissed. 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com