Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2014-15/2388

New ground cannot be taken at the appellate stage.

Case:-SANJAY ELECTRICAL Vs COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, NOIDA

Citation:-2014-TIOL-340-CESTAT-DEL

Brief facts:-Adjudication order dated 29.08.2012 confirms a composite service tax demand of Rs.50,27,977/- besides interest and penalty as specified therein on the ground that petitioner provided four categories of taxable services including (i) commercial or industrial construction service, the tax liability for which is assessed as Rs.68,500/- ; (ii) construction of residential complex service, which is assessed to Rs.3,63,742/-. At the present stage of the proceedings, ld. Counsel for the petitioner/appellant, Shri A.K. Batra does not contest the classification of these services nor the quantum of tax liability assessed as relatable to these services. It is however submitted by the ld. Counsel that the petitioner has remitted Rs.3,97,273/- plus the applicable interest thereon in respect of these services. The total assessed tax liability on these two services is Rs.4,34,272/-. The balance tax liability on these two services viz. commercial or industrial construction service and construction of residential complex service is thus Rs.35,000/- (approx.). In respect of erection, commissioning and installation services, the petitioner urged several contentions including that all the petitioner's activities alleged and classified by Revenue to constitute erection, commissioning and installation service were provided under composite contracts involving rendition of service and deemed sale of goods as well and therefore ought to be classified as works contract service and are classifiable under Section 65(105)(zzzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The tax liability assessed on erection, commissioning and installation, is Rs.26,01,012/-. Prima facie, since the period in dispute is 1.4.2010 to 31.03.2011, subsequent to introduction of works contract service, which is an independent taxable service and undisputedly the services provided by the petitioner are under composite contracts involving rendition of service and deemed transfer of the goods during the course of executing the works, these should prima facie be classified as work contract. The petitioner's claim for execution of the value of the goods incorporated, claimed to be to the extent of 90% of the gross consideration received was not accepted on the ground that no proof was furnished regarding the value of goods or deemed to have been sold during the course of rendering the service. The Commissioner granted the benefit of abatement of 67% only under Notification No.1/2006-ST.

Appellant contention:-It is submitted that the petitioner has made out a strong prima facie case in respect of the levy of Rs.7,87,000/- out of 19,94,813/- assessed as liable for management, maintenance or repair service. The balance of Rs.12,07,178/- is assessed for having provided Management, Maintenance and Repair service covered by works contracts involving operation and repair of pump houses and diesel generating sets at different locations for the Ganga Jal Distribution Scheme of Noida. The agreement between the petitioner and the Noida Authority requires the petitioner to depute qualified Pump Operators to run the Diesel Sets; Electricians to provide round the clock operations and generally to keep the DG sets and pump houses in a state of constant operation. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that these activities do not fall within Management, Maintenance or Repair service, since the essential nature of the activity is operation of the DG sets and pump houses and that Management, Maintenance and Repair is merely incidental to that primary purpose. Further the petitioner has also contended that the adjudication order is unsustainable for want of jurisdiction by the Commissioner, Noida, since the petitioner is resident at Delhi.

Reasoning of judgment:-The tribunal is not inclined to consider this contention at this stage of the proceedings since the material on record does not reflect this objection having been raised before the adjudicating authority. Whether exercise of the jurisdiction by Commissioner, Noida is valid requires a deeper analysis. Since the service falls within the ambit of works contract service, an independent taxable service, introduced w.e.f. 1.6.2007 and is required to be classified only as works contract service, in view of the classification discipline mandated by Section 65 (A) of the Act, the amount of Rs.26,01,012/- being the tax liability assessed on Erection, Commissioning and Installation service is unsustainable. Insofar as Management, maintenance or repair service is concerned, according to the ld. Counsel, the tax liability on this is assessed as Rs.19,94,813/-. Of this amount Rs.7,87,000/- is on account of a contract involving shifting and strengthening of electric lines and street lights in different specified locations. On prima facie analysis of the provisions of this contract, this service falls more appropriately under erection, commissioning and installation but not within the ambit of management, maintenance or repair. The definition of Management, Maintenance and Repair service under Section 65(64) of the Act is any service provided under a contract or agreement by the manufacturer or any person authorized by him, in relation to, management of properties, whether immovable or not; maintenance or repair of properties, whether immovable or not; or maintenance or repair including reconditioning or restoration, or servicing of any goods, excluding a motor vehicle. The agreement between the petitioner and the Noida Authority requires the petitioner to take over the operation of DG sets and the pump houses and cater to the management, maintenance and repair of these equipment and infrastructure as well. The management of these movable or immovable properties is the essence of the agreement and the maintenance or repair is integral to the, overall assumption of the management function. Though ld. Counsel for the petitioner has relied on judgements of this Tribunal including CMS (I) Operations and Maintenance Co. Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2007 (7) STR 369 (Tribunal-Chennai) = (2007-TIOL-892- CESTAT-MAD) and Wartsila India Ltd. reported in 2011 (22) STR 338 (Tribunal-Mumbai), we find that on a perusal of these decisions, that there is no analysis on or reference to provisions of Section 65(64) of the Finance Act, which defines the taxable service of Management, Maintenance and Repair.

We therefore grant waiver of pre-deposit and stay all further proceedings pursuant to the adjudication order dated 29.08.2012 passed by the commissioner, Customs & Service Tax, Noida on condition that the petitioner remits Rs.12,42,000/- (comprising Rs.1,27,000/- on management, maintenance or repair service and Rs.35,000/- towards the balance liability on commercial or industrial and residential complex services) plus the proportionate interest thereon, within six weeks and report compliance by 11.3.2014. In default, the stay shall stand dissolved and appeal shall stand dismissed for failure of pre-deposit. The ld. counsel for the petitioner is present in the court and undertakes to intimate to the petitioner its obligations under this order.

The stay application is disposed of as above.
 
Decision:-Part pre-deposit ordered.
 
Comment:-The substance of this case is that at the appellate stage, it is not possible to take entirely new ground that has not been taken at the adjudication stage. As the ground of jurisdiction was taken for the first time before the Tribunal, the same was not accepted and pre-deposit was ordered.
 
Prepared by: Shubham Sancheti

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com