Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2014-15/2450

Mere procuring of orders for principal by an agent on commission basis would not amount to providing service of C & F agent.

Case:- MALHOTRA DISTRIBUTORS PVT. LTD. VERSUS C.C.E., MUMBAI-I
 
Citation:- 2014 (36) S.T.R. 93 (Tri. - Mumbai)

 
Brief facts:- The appellant M/s. Malhotra Distributors Pvt. Ltd. (MDPL) entered into an agreement with M/s. Vidyut Metallics Ltd. (VML) for rendering assistance in the marketing of goods produced by the latter by obtaining orders and also ensuring that the goods are sold at the terms and discounts as specified by VML. For the services rendered, they were getting a commission from M/s. VML. The department was of the view that the services rendered by the appellant is classifiable under the category of ‘Clearing and Forwarding Services’ and accordingly, a Service Tax demand of Rs. 61,16,009/- was confirmed for the period October, 1998 to September, 2000 along with interest thereon. Penalties under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were also imposed on the appellant. The appellant preferred an appeal before the lower appellate authority, who vide the impugned order dismissed their appeal and hence, the appellant is before tribunal.
 
Appellant’s contention:- The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that as per the agreement entered into with M/s. VML, they were procuring the orders for the goods from the stockists and were forwarding the same to the manufacturer for which they get a commission @ 3.7% of the net sale value from M/s. VML. They rendered only services relating to marketing of the goods and did not deal with the goods in any manner and as per the circular issued by the C.B.E. & C. vide Circular No. 87/97/10/Service Tax/97 issued in July, 97, the scope of clearing and forwarding service has been clarified as follows :-
 
“2.2 Normally, there is a contract between the principal and the clearing and forwarding agent detailing the terms and conditions and also indicating the commission or remuneration to which the C&F agent is entitled. A clearing and Forwarding agent normally undertakes the following :-
(a)  Receiving the goods from the factories or premises of the principal or his agents;
(b)  Warehousing these goods;
(c)  Receiving despatch orders from the principal;
(d)  Arranging despatch of goods as per the directions of the principal by engaging transport on his own or through the authorised transporters of the principal;
(e)  Maintaining records of the receipt and despatch of goods and the stock available at the warehouse;
(f)   Preparing invoices on behalf of the principal.”
They have undertaken none of the above activities and, therefore, the services rendered by them do not come under the category of ‘Clearing and Forwarding Services’.
 
The learned Counsel further submits that both the adjudicating and appellate authority while classifying the services under the category of Clearing & Forwarding Agency services, have relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Prabhat Zarda Factory (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise - 2002 (145)E.L.T.222 (Tri.-Kol.) = 2006 (2)S.T.R.584 (Tribunal)while concluding that the services rendered by the appellant was that of clearing & forwarding agency. However, the said decision has been overruled by the Larger Bench of this Tribunal in the case of L&T Ltd. - 2006 (3)S.T.R.321 (Tri.-LB), wherein the Tribunal held that procuring purchase orders for the vendor on a commission basis would not amount to clearing and forwarding agency service and, on the other hand, would come under the category of Business Auxiliary Service, which is brought into the tax net from 1-3-2003 onwards. In view of the decision of the Larger Bench, the service rendered by the appellant is not classifiable under Clearing & Forwarding Agent services. The learned Counsel also relies on the decision of Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of United Plastomers reported in 2008 (10)S.T.R.229 (P & H), decision of the Tribunal in the case of Shivangi Steel Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2011 (24)S.T.R.701 (Tri.-Del.)and the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Energy Equipment Distributor vide Order No. A/48/WZB/ 2007/CSTB/C-I, dated 22-1-2007 wherein it has been held that mere procuring/booking of orders for the principal by an agent on commission basis would not amount to providing services of clearing & forwarding agent. In the light of the above, he pleads for allowing the appeals.
 
Respondent’s contention:-The learned Addl. Commissioner (AR) appearing for the Revenue reiterates the findings of the lower authorities.
 
Reasoning of judgment:- As per Section 65(105)(j) Clearing & Forwarding Agency Services has been defined as under :-
“Any services provided or to be provided to any person by a clearing and forwarding agent in relation to clearing and forwarding operations in any manner.”
As per Section 65(25) ‘Clearing & Forwarding Agent’ means any person who is engaged in providing any services directly or indirectly, connected with Clearing & Forwarding in any manner to any person and includes a consignment agent.
The C.B.E. & C. vide Circular dated July, 1997 (cited supra) had clarified the scope of the services undertaken by the clearing & forwarding agent. The clarification provided clearly says that such agent should receive the goods, warehouse the goods and arrange for the dispatch of the goods as per directions of principal and also maintain a record of receipt and dispatch and also at time prepare invoices on behalf of the principal.
In the present case, we have gone through the agreement entered into between the appellant and M/s. VML. The agreement says that the appellant has to procure the orders from the stockists and forward the same to M/s. VML. Further, the appellant has to ensure that the goods are sold at the terms and discounts specified in writing by VML from time to time. For the services so rendered, M/s. VML shall be charged @ 3.7% on the net sale value. Thus, from the terms and conditions entered into by the appellant, it is clear that the appellant was acting as a commission agent by procuring the orders for the sale of the goods. The appellant did not deal with the goods at all as is expected in the case of Clearing & Forwarding Agent.
The Larger Bench of this Tribunal in the case of M/s. L&T Ltd. (supra) held that an agent engaged only for procuring purchase orders for the vendor on commission basis, is not engaged in the clearing and forwarding activity either directly or indirectly and, therefore, mere procuring or booking orders for the principal by an agent on commission basis would not amount to providing services as clearing and forwarding agent within the meaning of the definition of that expression under Section 65(25) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Hon’ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana in the case of United Plastomers (supra), has also held that mere procuring of orders on commission basis does not amount to ‘Clearing & Forwarding Agent Service’. The same view was held by the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of OKS Specialities Lubricants Pvt. Ltd. -2009 (16)S.T.R.403 (Kar). Subsequently, this Tribunal itself in a number of cases like, Shivangi Steel Pvt. Ltd. and Energy Equipment Distributoretc. followed the decision of the Larger Bench and the decision of Hon’ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana and Karnataka. Following these decisions and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the present case, the tribunal was of the view that the services rendered by the appellant does not fall within the taxable service category of Clearing & Forwarding Agent Services.
Accordingly, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
 
Decision:- Appeal allowed.
 
Comment:- The analogy of the case is that an agent engaged only for procuring orders for the principal on commission basis, is not engaged in the clearing and forwarding activity either directly or indirectly and, therefore, mere procuring or booking orders for the principal by an agent on commission basis would not amount to providing services as clearing and forwarding agent. Consequently, the appeal was allowed by placing reliance on number of decisions given by the tribunal on the issue.
 
Prepared by:- Monika Tak 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com