Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case law/2014-15/2260

Mere of hiring of equipment not covered under “ supply of tangible goods for use”.

Case:-PRAVEEN ENGINEERING WORKS Vs COMMISSIONER OF SEVICE TAX, RAIGAD

Citation:-2014(33) S.T.R 719 (Tri.- Mumbai)

Brief Facts:-The Appellant, M/s Praveen Engineering Works rendered services such as cleaning service, service of supply of tangible goods for use service and manpower recruitment and supply agency service to M/s Mahindra Ugine Steel Co. Ltd. (MUSCO For Short) during the period 2005-06 to 2009-10. However, they did not discharge Service Tax liability. The department was of the view that the activity undertaken by the appellant came under the category of “ Supply of Tangible Goods and Services” and therefore, the appellant was liable to discharge Service Tax Liability of Rs. 23,93,668/- which was confirmed along with interest thereon and also by imposing equivalent penalty. The appeal filed against the said order before the appellate authority met with rejection. Hence the appellant is before the Tribunal.

Appellant’s Contention:- The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the activity undertaken by them in majority of the cases was supply of JPB for which they collected hire charges. The said activity of hiring of equipment does not come under the category of cleaning service. In a few cases, they have undertaken cleaning activity themselves but this forms only a small part of the total amount of service tax demanded from them. As regards the manpower supply service also, this constitute a small portion of their activity. It is contended that, if the hiring activity is excluded, then the turnover of the appellant would be less than the exemption limit for small service providers prevalent at the relevant time and the appellant would not be liable to any Service Tax at all. It is appellant’s contention that the bills raised by them are available with the department which has not been examined and the demand has been confirmed mechanically. Therefore, the learned counsel pleads for grant of stay.

Respondent’s Contention:-The learned Additional Commissioner( AR) appearing for the revenue, on the other hand, relies on the statement given by the proprietor of the appellant-firm, Shri Rajesh Machindra Dhas, u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act,1944 wherein it has been admitted by the appellant that he has been supplying labour /manpower ,rendering cleaning services such as house-keeping and also supply of tangible goods such as JCB, dumpers, Poclain etc. to M/s MUSCO. Since the appellant has admitted to rendering of these services by hiring JCB, Poclain, dumpers etc. the demand is sustainable in law. Accordingly, he pleads for putting the appellant to terms.

Reasoning Of Judgment:- After carefully considering the submissions made by both the sides, the Tribunal was of the view that the appeal itself can be disposed of since the matter needs fresh consideration at the end of the adjudicating authority. Therefore, after waiving the requirement of pre-deposit of the dues adjudged against the appellant, the appeal itself was take up for final consideration.

The Tribunal pursued various invoices raised by the appellant on M/s MUSCO. In a large number of cases, it is seen that the invoices have been raised for hiring of equipment. The learned counsel has clarified that in the case of hiring of equipment, it is MUSCO who had the control over the equipment and the appellant has merely hired the equipment to MUSCO. They did not provide any operators for operating the equipment nor did they undertake any activity using the equipment. If these facts are correct, then the activity of hiring of the equipment would not come under the category of supply of tangible goods for use. The said service envisages operation and control the equipment or capital goods with the service provider. In the absence of operational control in the hands of the service provider, the service cannot be classified under “supply of tangible goods for use.”

Similarly with regard to the other activities undertaken by the appellant such as cleaning service, from the nature of the activity undertaken, it appears that the same involved excavation work also. If that be so, the activity would not be classifiable as a cleaning service. Since the factual position was not clear, Tribunal was of the considered view that the matter has to go back to the original adjudicating authority for fresh consideration for ascertaining the facts and thereafter decide the classification of service. If necessary, relevant information shall be obtained from the recipient of the service i.e. M/s MUSCO and the various bills and documents available on record raised by the appellant shall also be taken into account. If the activity involved was only mere hiring of the equipment without any operational control, it will not amount to supply of tangible goods for use. Similarly, the activity of cleaning said to have been undertaken by the appellant needs examination whether it comes under the scope of cleaning service as defined in law.

Thus, the appeals were allowed by way of remand for fresh consideration. Needless to say, the appellant has to be given reasonable opportunity of being heard before the order. The appellant is also directed to cooperate with the department in providing whatever documents they want for examination of the issue. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.
 
Decision:-Appeal allowed by way of remand.

Comment:-The analogy from the case is that in order to be classifiable under “Right to use tangible goods”, it is essential that the operational control to use the equipment lies with the service provider. The said service envisages operation and control the equipment or capital goods with the service provider. Accordingly, the matter was remanded to examine the above issue.

Prepared By: Lovina Surana
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com