Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2011-12/1314

Jurisdiction to issue Show Cause Notice

 Case: COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLHAPUR Vs HELIOS FOOD ADDITIVES PVT LTD
 
Citation: 2011-TIOL-1052-CESTAT-MUM
 
Issue:- Assessee having separate registered factory premises and separate Service Tax registration at other place – jurisdiction to issue service tax notice is with Department where Service Tax registration taken.
 
Brief Facts:- Respondent-assessee is manufacturer of Food products falling under various chapters of Central Excise Tariff and their factory is situated at Chiplun, District Ratnagiri. He is also engaged in providing the taxable services of renting immovable properties at Mumbai. During the course of audit, it was noticed that Respondent has not discharged the service tax liability on renting of immovable properties during the financial year 2007-2008.
 
Accordingly, a show-cause notice was issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise, Ratnagiri proposing to demand of service tax with interest thereon under Section 75 and also proposing to impose penalties under Section 76, 77 & 78 of the said Finance Act. Respondent contended that the AC, ratnagiri did not have jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice but the jurisdictional AC at Mumbai has the jurisdiction to issue show cause notice.
 
However, the Assistant Commissioner, Ratnagiri passed order confirming the duty demand and interest thereon and also imposing a penalties under various sections of the Finance Act.
 
In appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the impugned order passed by the lower Adjudicating Authority on the ground that since the appellants were already registered in Mumbai, the Assistant Commissioner at Ratnagiri does not have any jurisdiction either to issue notice or to demand service tax.
 
Against the said order of the Lower Appellate Authority, Department is in appeal before the Tribunal.
 
Appellant’s Contention:- Department urged that since the Factory of the assessee is situated at Ratnagiri, the Assistant Commissioner, Ratnagiri has jurisdiction over the factory of the assessee and the assessee has also been issued with a service tax registration at Ratnagiri. In as much as the assessee has provided the taxable service of ‘renting of immovable property' without payment of service tax, they are liable to pay service tax on the said service.
 
Respondent’s Contention:- Respondent-assessee contested the demand and submitted that the service has been rendered in Mumbai and they are registered for service tax at Mumbai and, therefore, the Assistant Commissioner at Ratnagiri does not have the jurisdiction to issue notice.
 
The assessee submits that the Commissionerate at Pune-II has jurisdiction in the Districts of Sindhudurg, Ratnagiri, Sangli, Kolhapur and Satara of the State of Maharashtra vide Notification no. 14/2002-CE(N.T) dated 08.03.2002.
 
Assessee also submittted that they have obtained a separate registration for service tax at Mumbai on 29.01.2009, which is much before the issuance of show-cause notice dated 05.03.2009. They also submit that they have their registered office in Mumbai and, therefore, the competent authority to initiate proceedings in relation to service tax is the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai. They also rely on the judgment in the case of CCE, C & ST, BBSR-II vs. Ores India (P) Ltd [2009 (91) RLT 81 (CESTAT-Kol)] wherein it has been held that the Commissioner, in whose territorial jurisdiction the registered office of service provider is located, has jurisdiction over him irrespective of the place where service is provided. In the light of these submissions, it was contended that the proceedings initiated at Ratnagiri are not sustainable in law and, therefore, the order of the lower Appellate Authority has to be upheld.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:- The Tribunal held that as far as Mumbai is concerned, the jurisdiction lies with the Mumbai Central Excise Commissionerate. Since the Central Excise officers have been entrusted with the task of enforcing the provisions of service tax law, their jurisdiction in respect of service tax is concurrent with the jurisdiction of Central Excise.
 
Therefore, the Assistant Commissioner in Ratnagiri does not have any power to initiate proceedings and recover service tax in respect of services rendered in Mumbai as the same falls outside his jurisdiction.
 
There is no dispute about the fact that the service of renting of immovable property was undertaken by the respondent/assessee at Mumbai and the registered office of the assessee is also in Mumbai. It is, further, on record that the respondent/assessee had obtained service tax registration in Mumbai from the Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Service Tax Division-V, Mumbai, vide registration certificate dated 29.01.2009. That being the position, the competent authority to issue show-cause notice and recover service tax in respect of services rendered in Mumbai, is the Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax in Mumbai and not the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise at Ratnagiri. This Tribunal in the Ores India (P) Ltd case has clearly held that as per Rule 3 of Service Tax Rules, 1994 read with Board's order no. 1/94 dated 29.06.1994, it is the Commissioner in whose territorial jurisdiction the registered office of the service provider is located, has the jurisdiction over him irrespective of the place where service is provided. In the instant case, the service has been provided at Mumbai and the registered office is also situated in Mumbai. Therefore, the Assistant Commissioner, Ratnagiri has no jurisdiction over the activities undertaken by the respondent in Mumbai. Therefore, the proceedings initiated by the Assistant Commissioner, Ratnagiri is unsustainable in law, as rightly held by the lower appellate authority.
 
Decision:- Appeal dismissed.

Comment: - This is very important decision where in the jurisdiction of the authorities issuing show cause notice is defined. We have also come across a situation where the jurisdictional authorities of a place where the service is provided has issued the show cause notice. But the office of service provider was at other place. We have also successfully contended that a person can provide service all over India but the registration will be taken at a place where his office is located. The authorities at this place can issue show cause notice to him. Hence the demand is not sustatinable. This decision also underlines the same analogy.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com