Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2016-17/3113

Issuance of Debit/Credit notes sufficient to account for adjustment of negotiation and claiming refund of tax.

Case:- PIRAMAL ENTERPRISES LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI
 
Citation:- 2016 (42) S.T.R. 17 (Tri. – Mumbai)

 
Brief facts:- This appeal is filed by M/s. Piramal Enterprises Ltd. against Order-in-Appeal No: SB(86)86/STC/2010, dated 30th June, 2010 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai Zone-I concurring with rejection of the refund claim of ` 36,10,050/- by the Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax, Division-III, Mumbai. The appellant had entered into an agreement with M/s. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. on 29th April, 2005 by which, in return for services, the appellant would be compensated @ 0.50% of turnover besides sharing in the expenditure incurred by the appellant for rendering services as per agreed proportion. The appellant is registered with the service tax authorities as provider of “management consultancy services.”
 
The appellant had charged M/s. Nicholas Piramal India Limited an amount of ` 3,00,80,21,300/- in accordance with the agreement for two quarters on 13th April, 2007 and 9th July, 2007 by issue of debit notes. The said amounts included service tax component at the applicable rates. It transpired that the appellant, after discussions with the client on 25th September, 2007, agreed for reduction in charges by ` 2,93,50,000/- for the period covered by the two debit notes issued earlier. Accordingly, a credit note for ` 3,29,60,050/- dated 10th October, 2007 was issued by the appellant. On the service tax component covered in the credit note, the appellant sought refund on account of over payment of tax.
 
The original authority rejected the claim for refund on the ground that such a reduction did not appear to have extended beyond the second component of the compensation, i.e., the share in expenses, in the sendee agreement. Moreover, as the assessee had neither furnished the basis on which the initial charge was levied nor any documentary evidence in support of the re-negotiated agreement, the application was held to be without merit. The impugned order went into the claim of the appellant that the basis for arriving at the reduction was not relevant as the issue was restricted to return of excess charges (inclusive of service tax) collected from M/s. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. for which ‘corporate service charge’ ledger account, service tax ledger account and bank account statement were submitted. The first appellate authority noted that debtor’s ledger account had not been made available for confirmation of the claim, that the appellant had received amounts of Rs. 3,51,79,262/- and Rs. 3,42,23,912/- in their bank account for the relevant period which did not correspond to the amounts in the debit notes, and that corporate service charge” ledger and bank account show receipt of only Rs. 3,29,50,000/- from M/s. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. which, along with the basis for the renegotiated agreement, were not explained by the appellant. The impugned order has held the differential amount between credit note and the bank statement to be attributable to the service tax component and hence barred by the principle of unjust enrichment.
 
Appellant’s Contention: - The learned Chartered Accountant, canvassing the claim of the appellant, reiterated the contents of the appeal and asserted that the ledger amounts would not match the debit notes or the credit notes owing to the statutory requirement to deduct tax at source for which certificates were produced. Further, decisions of the Tribunal in Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax v. Standard Chartered Bank [2006 (3) S.T.R. 751 (Tri.-Bang.)] in support of the contention that tax is leviable only on actual receipts, Shiva Analyticals (I) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore [2007 (7) S.T.R. 35 (Tri.-Bang.)] which relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mohd. Ekram Khan and Sons v. Commissioner of Trade Tax, UP [2004 (6) SCC 1083 SC] as well as Siltap Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara-II [2007 (7) S.T.R. 610 (Tri.-Mumbai) = 2006 (193) E.L.T. 461 (Tribunal)] approving the adequacy of credit notes as evidence of return of amounts to customers, and Addison & Co. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Madras [2003-TIOL-396-HC-MAD-CX = 2001 (129) E.L.T. 44 (Mad.)] to demonstrate that claimant for refund has merely to show that incidence of duty has been borne by him were adduced by him.
 
Respondent’s Contention: - Learned Authorised Representative cited the decision of the Tribunal in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kochi - 2014 (314) E.L.T. 744 (Tri.-Bang.) to claim that credit notes issued after the event are not sufficient to show that duty burden has not been passed on.
 
Reasoning Of Judgement: - The short point for consideration is whether there has been excess payment of tax and whether the bar of unjust enrichment will arise in relation to such excess payment of tax. It is now well settled in law that adjustment between commercial enterprises who are in constant interface can occur and that such occurrence is recorded through the medium of credit and debit notes. It is apparent from the records of the instant case that the two entities are part of the same group and hence adoption of this mode of settlement is acceptable as sufficient evidence of compensation for services rendered. The charges levied from M/s. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. by the appellant are amply evident in the debit notes pertaining to the quarter April, 2007 and September, 2007. It cannot but be accepted that the credit note issued in October, 2007 is intended to reduce the amounts payable by the client to the appellant to the extent of ` 2,93,50,000/-. The contention of the learned Chartered Accountant that any payment can be released only after withholding of tax deducted at source is borne out by the lesser amounts entered in the ledger and the bank statements. We find no flaw in this contention and there is no counter by Revenue that can contest this.
They also note that the decisions of the Tribunal cited by the learned Chartered Accountant clearly bring out the judicial pronouncements by which the bar of unjust enrichment will not operate even if the transactions are by debit and credit notes. It is also worth mentioning that there are only two instalments in which the claim of excess payments by M/s. Nicholas Piramal Ltd. has been made. Re-negotiation after initial payments does not, in any way, weaken the claim of the appellant because the fact of reduced net consideration is incontrovertible; the transaction does not extend to a chain beyond the appellant and M/s. Nicholas Piramal and, therefore, it can be deduced that the incidence of tax has had no scope of being passed on.
Accordingly, they find in favour of the appellant and set aside the impugned order. The appellant is entitled to refund of the amount claimed.
 
Decision:-Appeal Allowed.

Comment:- The substance of the case is that the bar of unjust enrichment will not operate even if the transactions are by debit and credit notes. Re-negotiation after initial payments does not, in any way, weaken the claim of the appellant because the fact of reduced net consideration is incontrovertible. As far as accounting has been done for negotiation of consideration, it can be deduced that the incidence of tax has not been passed on.

Prepared By: - Alakh Bhandari
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com