Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   GST lifted oil demand on higher vehicle sales, says report *   Moody’s gives thumbs up to GST, demonetisation  *   Pass on rate cut benefits immediately, companies tell traders *   Focus will now be on simplifying forms, IT processes under GST: Sushil Modi *  Tax rates lowered on consumer goods,only luxury goods taxed @ 28% *   Businesses can revise GST transition claim form now *  Multiplex owners in UP demand clarity on refund as tax exemptions go away after GST *   GST compliance: A case of much ado about nothing *  PM hints more relief for traders & businesses to ease GST compliance burden *  Infosys deploys more people in states to ease GSTN load *   Further reforms are needed for the GST to succeed *   GST impact! Massive stock clearance discounts on apparels, gadgets likely in December *  Kerala HC releases Detained Goods since State has No Power to make Rules to regulate Inter-State movement of Goods under GST *  Infosys is to blame for GST Network glitches, say government officials *   Publishers versus authors: Who will pay GST on royalty? *   कपड़ा निर्यातकों ने कहा, जीएसटी के कारण भारत से शिपमेंट में आ सकती है भारी कमी *   Tax professionals protest over GST returns filing in Gujarat *  Publishers versus authors: Who will pay GST on royalty? *   Pilot Implementation of Paperless Processing under SWIFT *   Anti-dumping duty levied on the imports of " Color Coated/ Pre-Painted flat products of alloy or non-alloy steel " s *   Anti-dumping duty levied on the imports of "Wire Rod of Alloy or Non- Alloy Steel "   *   Exemption on goods imported by EOUs from integrated tax and compensation cess   *   Fixation of Tariff Value of Edible Oils, Brass Scrap, Poppy Seeds, Areca Nut, Gold and Sliver  *   Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI  *   Amendment in various Customs exemption notifications to exempt Integrated Tax/Cess on import of goods under AA/EPCG schemes  *   BCD and IGST rates on certain goods prescribed   *   Amendment in rates of supply of services  *   Integrated Tax rate on the leasing of motor vehicles prescribed.  *   RCM to apply on supply of Used vehicles, seized and confiscated goods, old and used goods, waste and scrap  *   Amendment in notification no. 8/2017-IT dated 14.09.2017 so as to add certain items to the list of “handicrafts goods” 
Subject News *   All taxpayers  exempt from payment of tax on advances received in case of supply of goods *   Suppliers of services through an e-commerce platform are exempted from obtaining compulsory registration *   Refund of unutilized input tax credit of GST paid on inputs in respect of exporters of fabrics vide cicular no 18/2017 GST dt 16.11.17 *   Govt tells companies to pass on GST gains immediately *   Anti-profiteering authority to be set up under GST *   CBEC prescribes procedure for manual filing and processing of refund claims for zero rated supplies *  Changes in Tax rate of permanent transfer of Intellectual Property *  GST on Services by way of admission to protected monuments shall be exempted. *  Relevant Notification to be issued shortly, so as to be made available from 15th of November'17 *  Late fee payable for those where a tax liability arises will be Rs. 50/- per day. *  Supply of services by Composition taxpayer upto Rs 5 lakh per annum will be allowed *  Restaurants in hotel premises having room tariff of less than Rs 7500 per unit per day will attract GST of 5% without ITC. *  Restaurants in hotel premises having room tariff of Rs 7500 and above per day (even for a single room) will attract GST of 18% with full ITC. *  Job work services in relation to manufacture of those handicraft goods in respect of which the casual taxable person has been exempted from registration, shall be reduced to 5% with full ITC. *  All restaurants to levy 5% GST except 5-star ones. *  Tax rate on Bangles made out of lac/shellac has been reduced from 3% to Nil. *  GST rate on Fly Ash bricks has been reduced from 12% to 5%. *  GST rate has been reduced from 18% to 12% for Furniture wholly made of bamboo or cane. *  Tax Rate on Goods of Granites and marbles have been reduced from 28% to 18%. *  Gst rate on Guar meal has been reduced from 5% to nil. *  All stand-alone restaurants irrespective of air conditioned or otherwise, will attract 5% GST without ITC. *  Uniform rate of tax @ 1% under composition scheme for manufacturers and traders. *  Services provided through E-commerce platform shall be exempt from obtaining compulsory registration. *  Due date of TRAN-1 extended till 31.12.2017 along with one time option of revision. *  Due date of GSTR-4 for the quarter July-Sept,2017 revised to 24.12.2017. *  Due date of ITC-04 for the quarter July-Sept,2017 revised to 31.12.2017. *  A facility for manual filing of application for advance ruling shall be introduced. *  Late fee payable where tax liability for that month is ‘NIL’will be Rs. 20/- per day *  Late Fee of GSTR-3B will be re-credited to Electronic Cash Ledger under “Tax” head instead of “Fee” head. *  The time period for filing GSTR-2 and GSTR-3 for the months of July, 2017 to March 2018 would be worked out.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-2017/3451

In what circumstances penalty under section 80 be waived?

 
Case -MIDAS EVENTS VersusCOMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI

Citation- 2016 (41) S.T.R. 233 (Tri. - Mumbai)

Brief Facts:-The appellant, who were engaged in the business of ‘Event Management’ started their operations in 1999 and took Service Tax Registration in the year February 2003 for service tax category “Event Management”, which came into effect on August 2002. Investigations by the department revealed that the appellant did not pay their service tax liability for the above mentioned period. They did not submit any documents such as contracts and invoices relating to the service provided to their clients. They only submitted a bank statement of M/s. UTI Bank which indicated that they had received gross value of Rs. 10, 51, 77,288/- during the said period. It was also noticed that apart from not paying service tax since 2002, they never filed any ST3 returns. Show cause notice dated 7-4-2008 was issued to them which culminated in the impugned order of Commissioner of Service tax.
 
Appellant’s Contention- . Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that service tax was demanded on total gross value received by them which should be taken as cum-duty value because they neither collected nor received any amount over and above the amount shown in the Bank Statement. He relied on the Larger Bench decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-II v. Roopa Ram Suthar [2014 (35)S.T.R.583 (Tri.-Del.]. He also prayed for waiver of penalty relying on the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka judgment in the case of Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore v. Motor World [2012 (27)S.T.R.225 (Kar.)].

Respondent’s Contention-  On the other hand ld. A.R., appearing on behalf of Revenue expressed the non-cooperative attitude of the appellant right from the beginning in not receiving show cause notice, not replying to the show cause notice and not appearing for personal hearing on various grounds such as ill health. He emphasized that appellant did not produce any documents throughout the investigation and upto the time of adjudication. The duty has been demanded correctly on the total amount received by the appellant. On the aspect of penalty and time bar, he relied on the Tribunal decision in the case of Board of Control for Cricket in India v. C.S.T., Mumbai-I [2015 (37)S.T.R.785 (Tri. - Mumbai) [which was upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court reported in [2015 (37)S.T.R.J176 (S.C.)].

Reasoning of Judgment – The aspect of leviability of service tax was not disputed by the ld. Counsel only disputes that gross value received by them should be considered as cum-duty value. They found that the appellant at no stage made available any documents such as invoices and contracts with their clients which would indicate that value received by them is cum-duty value. They noticed that one of the clients was a well-known company i.e. Hindustan Unilever. They found no reason why any documents could not have been obtained from their client to show that the value received by them was actually cum-duty value. Appellant got enough opportunity to produce documents from their client even if their own documents were washed away in floods. The case of Roopa Ram Suthar (supra) does not come to the aid of the client because in that case documents existed and invoices clearly disclosed that no service tax component was added and collected from customer. Therefore authority was not inclined to agree with counsel’s contention and the same was rejected.
On the issue of extended time period and penalty, they noted that appellant was very well aware of their responsibility and liability, having taken service tax registration in Feb 2003. But appellant still chose to avoid all Legal obligations cast on them after taken service tax registration and not complying with the requirement of filing ST3 returns on periodical basis for a long period of six years till the time of issuance of show cause notice. In the appeal memorandum, it was submitted that Commissioner ought to have granted another date of hearing after the last date of hearing 16-12-2008 whereas impugned order was passed on 4-3-2009. They did not accept this contention in the light of appellant’s callous attitude from the beginning since they took registration. Considering that appellant had service tax registration but did not receive the show cause notice, did not submit reply to the show cause notice, did not even appear for personal hearings on various dates can only lead to the conclusion that their intentions were not bona fide. Considering the CESTAT judgment in the case of Board of Control for Cricket in India (supra) as affirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court, they did not find it a fit case for waiving penalty. It was certainly not a case for waiver of penalties under Section 80 of the Finance Act. Penalty may not be imposed in terms of Section 80 if the assessee proves that there was reasonable cause for failure to pay service tax and file returns. No “reasonable cause” whatsoever had been shown to us to deserve the benefit of Section 80.
 
Appeal rejected.

Comment –  the gist of the case was that for invoices to be considered cum duty value there must be a valid proof with assessee to prove that they did not receive the tax amount separately. Further the case also held that for waiver of penalty assessee is ought to produce a reasonable cause and bonafide belief of not paying tax and filling returns. In absence of them penalty shall be levied

Prepared by- Neha bhansali

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com