Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   Fixation of Tariff Value of Edible Oils, Brass Scrap, Poppy Seeds, Areca Nut, Gold and Sliver   *   Imposition of anti dumping duty "Ammonium Nitrate"originating in exported from Russia, Indonesia, Georgia and Iran *   Exemption to a person making inter-State taxable supplies of handicraft goods from the requirement to obtain registration granted  *   Exemption from registration to job-workers making inter-State supply of services to a registered person granted *  The notification amends the rates of compensation cess on various motor vehicles *   Clarifcation for classification and GST rate on lottery *   Directions to Bank regarding export to Algeria *   Implementation of Notification No. 19 dated 5.8.2017 *   Enlistment of Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) under Appendix 2C & 2E *   Extension in last date of  Export of preferential quota sugar to USA under TRQ quota *   Correction / Amendments in Table 2 of Appendix 3B Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 *   Proformae for submission of applications for export of Red sanders wood and import of sandalwood notified *   Amendment in import policy of raw sugar *   Revision in Policy condition no 2 to Chapter 95 of ITC(HS), 2017 *   Clarification on difficulties related to recent amendments in Customs Act, 1962. *   Implementation of electronic sealing for containers by exporters *   Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 08.09. 2017 {See notification no 84/2017-Cus (NT),dt. 07.09.2017 in What’s new} *   Jurisdiction of customs officers for the purpose of audit defined {See notification no 85/2017-Cus (NT),dt. 07.09.2017 in What’s new} *   GST Workshop for babus held *   GST cess hike on luxury cars approved by cabinet *   Punjab Govt unable to pay salary to its employees *   Narendra Modi Proposes GST Registration for small traders. *   Govt restricts imports of gold, silver from South Korea  *   West Bengal Sweetmeat Makers go on Hunger-strike Against GST *   Appointment of officers as the Principal Chief Commissioners of Customs or Chief Commissioners of Customs and allotted their jurisdiction *   Amendment in Para 4.32(i) of chapter 4 and in para 6.01 (a) of chapter 6 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 *   Supply of essential commodities to the Republic of Maldives during 2017-18 *   Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 18th August, 2017 notified  *   Classes of persons who shall pay customs duty electronically notified *   Change in AIRs of Duty Drawback on Gold Jewellery, Silver Jewellery and Silver Articles 
Subject News *   Extension in the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017 *   Seventh amendment to the CGST Rules, 2017 *   Notifying section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017 for TDS *   Granting exemption from registration to a casual taxable person making taxable supplies of handicraft goods. *   Extension in the time limit for filing of GSTR-6. *   Extension in the time limit for filing of GSTR-1, GSTR-2 and GSTR-3. *   Amendment in certain customs notifications in pursuance to change made in Budget 2017-18. *   Exemptions to goods imported for organising FIFA under 17, world cup, 2017 *   Seeks to extend due dates for furnishing details/Returns for the months of July, 2017 and August, 2017. *   System based reconciliation of information furnished in FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR-2 with FORM GSTR-3B *   Single point service Contact@DGFT eastablished. *   Imposition of CVD on imports of Certain Hot Rolled and Cold Rolled Stainless Steel Flat Products *   Reduction of BCD on raw sugar upto a quantity of 3 lakh MT {See notification no 74/2017-Cus,dt. 07-09-2017in What’s new} *  Seeks to continue anti-dumping inforce concerning imports of "Metronidazole" originating in exported from China PR *  seeks to levy definitive anti-dumping duty, on Castings for Wind Operated Electricity Generators *  seeks to impose anti-dumping duty on "Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR) *   What is Form GST TRAN-1 and when to File it *   How To Revise Invoice In GST *   Advertising space in print media to attract 5% GST *  Seeks to impose anti-dumping duty on " TexturedToughened (Tempered) Glass ", originating in or exported from China PR *  Seeks to amend notification No. 49/2012 - Customs (ADD) dated the 26th November,2012 to modify the amount of anti-dumping duty on import of Caustic Soda originating in or exported from Iran, Saudi Arabia and USA. *  Seeks to impose anti-dumping duty on the imports of "Sodium Nitrite" originating in or exported from China PR. *  Notification No.82/2017-Customs (N.T.) dated 24th August, 2017 *  Amendment in import policy of Beans of the species Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper or Vigna radiate (L.) Wilczek under Chapter 7 of the ITC (HS) 2017, Schedule â I (Import Policy) *  Amendment in Para 3.24(j) of Chapter-3 of FTP 2015-20 *  Amendment in Para 2.07 of Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020. *  Amendment in import policy of gold and silver under Chapter 71 of the ITC(HS) 2017, Schedule -I (I) *   Seeks to modify the amount of anti-dumping duty on import of Caustic Soda originating in or exported from Iran, Saudi Arabia and USA *   Seeks to impose anti-dumping duty on the imports of "Sodium Nitrite" originating in or exported from China PR *   Amendment in the CGST Rules, 2017   

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-2017/3451

In what circumstances penalty under section 80 be waived?

 
Case -MIDAS EVENTS VersusCOMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI

Citation- 2016 (41) S.T.R. 233 (Tri. - Mumbai)

Brief Facts:-The appellant, who were engaged in the business of ‘Event Management’ started their operations in 1999 and took Service Tax Registration in the year February 2003 for service tax category “Event Management”, which came into effect on August 2002. Investigations by the department revealed that the appellant did not pay their service tax liability for the above mentioned period. They did not submit any documents such as contracts and invoices relating to the service provided to their clients. They only submitted a bank statement of M/s. UTI Bank which indicated that they had received gross value of Rs. 10, 51, 77,288/- during the said period. It was also noticed that apart from not paying service tax since 2002, they never filed any ST3 returns. Show cause notice dated 7-4-2008 was issued to them which culminated in the impugned order of Commissioner of Service tax.
 
Appellant’s Contention- . Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that service tax was demanded on total gross value received by them which should be taken as cum-duty value because they neither collected nor received any amount over and above the amount shown in the Bank Statement. He relied on the Larger Bench decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-II v. Roopa Ram Suthar [2014 (35)S.T.R.583 (Tri.-Del.]. He also prayed for waiver of penalty relying on the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka judgment in the case of Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore v. Motor World [2012 (27)S.T.R.225 (Kar.)].

Respondent’s Contention-  On the other hand ld. A.R., appearing on behalf of Revenue expressed the non-cooperative attitude of the appellant right from the beginning in not receiving show cause notice, not replying to the show cause notice and not appearing for personal hearing on various grounds such as ill health. He emphasized that appellant did not produce any documents throughout the investigation and upto the time of adjudication. The duty has been demanded correctly on the total amount received by the appellant. On the aspect of penalty and time bar, he relied on the Tribunal decision in the case of Board of Control for Cricket in India v. C.S.T., Mumbai-I [2015 (37)S.T.R.785 (Tri. - Mumbai) [which was upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court reported in [2015 (37)S.T.R.J176 (S.C.)].

Reasoning of Judgment – The aspect of leviability of service tax was not disputed by the ld. Counsel only disputes that gross value received by them should be considered as cum-duty value. They found that the appellant at no stage made available any documents such as invoices and contracts with their clients which would indicate that value received by them is cum-duty value. They noticed that one of the clients was a well-known company i.e. Hindustan Unilever. They found no reason why any documents could not have been obtained from their client to show that the value received by them was actually cum-duty value. Appellant got enough opportunity to produce documents from their client even if their own documents were washed away in floods. The case of Roopa Ram Suthar (supra) does not come to the aid of the client because in that case documents existed and invoices clearly disclosed that no service tax component was added and collected from customer. Therefore authority was not inclined to agree with counsel’s contention and the same was rejected.
On the issue of extended time period and penalty, they noted that appellant was very well aware of their responsibility and liability, having taken service tax registration in Feb 2003. But appellant still chose to avoid all Legal obligations cast on them after taken service tax registration and not complying with the requirement of filing ST3 returns on periodical basis for a long period of six years till the time of issuance of show cause notice. In the appeal memorandum, it was submitted that Commissioner ought to have granted another date of hearing after the last date of hearing 16-12-2008 whereas impugned order was passed on 4-3-2009. They did not accept this contention in the light of appellant’s callous attitude from the beginning since they took registration. Considering that appellant had service tax registration but did not receive the show cause notice, did not submit reply to the show cause notice, did not even appear for personal hearings on various dates can only lead to the conclusion that their intentions were not bona fide. Considering the CESTAT judgment in the case of Board of Control for Cricket in India (supra) as affirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court, they did not find it a fit case for waiving penalty. It was certainly not a case for waiver of penalties under Section 80 of the Finance Act. Penalty may not be imposed in terms of Section 80 if the assessee proves that there was reasonable cause for failure to pay service tax and file returns. No “reasonable cause” whatsoever had been shown to us to deserve the benefit of Section 80.
 
Appeal rejected.

Comment –  the gist of the case was that for invoices to be considered cum duty value there must be a valid proof with assessee to prove that they did not receive the tax amount separately. Further the case also held that for waiver of penalty assessee is ought to produce a reasonable cause and bonafide belief of not paying tax and filling returns. In absence of them penalty shall be levied

Prepared by- Neha bhansali

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com