Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law /2016-17/3372

In view of bona fide belief on non-taxability of an activity, is penalty imposable?

Case - SHOBHAN SARKAR TRAVELS Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & S.T., INDORE
Citation- 2016 (45) S.T.R. 208 (Tri. - Del.)
Brief Facts -Revenue was not sure about category under which providing of bus service to carry employees of company would fall and wrongly issuing show cause notice under Tour Operator Service .It was only after dropping of demand by adjudicating authority under Tour Operator Service that a fresh show cause notice under Rent-a-Cab service was issued after some time by which time period under present case had expired. Authorities have confirmed the service tax demand of Rs. 90,272/- along with confirmation of demand of interest and have further imposed penalty in terms of Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, on the finding that during the period April, 2011 to March, 2012, they have provided services falling under the category of rent-a-cab.
Appellant’s Contention-The appellant contended that they were providing Bus services to M/s. Ranbaxy Laboratories for transportation of their employees from home to factory and vice versa. They were earlier issued a show cause notice by the authorities on 5-4-2011 seeking to confirm service tax for the period October, 2009 to September, 2010 under the category of “Tour Operator Services”. The said show cause notice was adjudicated by the Assistant Commissioner vide his order dated 25-7-2012 observing that the services provided by the assessee may amount to providing services under the category of rent-a-cab. However, he vacated the show cause notice on the ground that adjudicating authority cannot go beyond the show cause notices, which allege providing of tour operator services. Revenue’s appeal against the said order of Assistant Commissioner was rejected by Commissioner (A).In this background, submission of ld. Advocate that they continued to provide services to their customers without payment of service tax under any category inasmuch as by the time the order of the Assistant Commissioner indicating that the services may fall under rent-a-cab was issued, the period in present appeal was over. It is only subsequently Revenue issued a show cause notice on 9-10-2011 raising the demand for the period April, 2011 to March, 2012. Ld. Advocate submits that they have already deposited the entire service tax demand along with interest and are not challenging the same. However, the only challenge is to imposition of penalty, which she prays for setting aside on the ground of bona fide and in the above backdrop of the matter.
Respondent’s Contention-  Revenue contended that earlier proceedings were dropped on the technical grounds of the empowerment of the adjudicating authority to go beyond the show cause notices otherwise it is clearly observed in the earlier order of the Assistant Commissioner that the services provided by the appellant would fall under rent-a-cab services. However, ld. DR fairly agrees that by the time the said order was passed the period in the present appeal was over.
Reasoning of Judgment –The only challenge is to imposition of penalty on the ground of bona fide. The appreciation of the entire development on record leads to one fact that even the Revenue was not clear about category of services under which assessee can be taxed and that is why initially Revenue issued a show cause notice under the category of Tour Operator Services. Though there is observation of the Assistant Commissioner in the earlier order that the appellant’s services are properly classifiable under rent-a-cab services but by the time such observation was made by the adjudicating authority, the period under the present case had lapsed. As such it can be fairly concluded that the appellant was under the bona fide belief that there services may fall under different category or that may not be taxable at all as they were not admittedly covered under the Tour Operator Services. In such a scenario, it is of the view that by extending the benefit of doubt to the assessee the penalty imposed upon them is liable to be set aside.
 
Appeal allowed.
Comment –   The plot of the case is that the assesse was providing service under the head rent – a - cab but revenue wrongly issued a show cause notice for interest & penalty for service provided by them under category of tour operator service. Also by the time such observation was made by the adjudicating authority, the period under the present case had lapsed. Thus by  extending the benefit of doubt to the assessee the penalty imposed upon them is liable to be set aside.
Prepared by- Alakh Bhandari
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com