Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2018-2019/3530

If the tips and balls used in the manufacturing of ball point pens are not taxable at the rate of 12% under HSN 9608, then at what rate shall they be taxable and under which HSN?
Case:Shiva Writing Company Pvt. ltd

Citation:44/WBAAR/2018-19 dated 13.03.19

Issue:If the tips and balls used in the manufacturing of ball point pens are not taxable at the rate of 12% under HSN 9608, then at what rate shall they be taxable and under which HSN?
Brief facts: Applicant is in the business of manufacturing and supplying of ball point pens. The applicant requires pen tips and balls for manufacturing of pens. Balls are used inside tips in order to make tips working. Applicant also trades and supplies ball point pen tips and refills to various dealers.

Respondent’s Contention and Reasoning of Judgment:
Since the applicant has referred to the products as ball point pen balls and Nibs, thenit appeared to AAR that applicant was using the words “Tip” and “Nib” interchangeably, and to clear the confusion applicant was asked to submit samples of the products on which the Ruling has been sought for. The applicant only referred in their query about the tax rate on “Tip” and “Balls”.
“Nibs” and “Tips” of pens are completely two different products with distinguishable anatomy catering to different kinds of ink and hence, use. While the split down the centre is the essential and salient feature of a “Nib”, the ball at the end of the refill is the essential and salient feature of a “Tip”. The two terms cannot be used synonymously and/or as substitutes of each other.
Thereafter, after testing the samples, the authority concluded that the product on which Ruling has been sought is pen balls and “tips” and takes up the matter of classification and applicability of the Rate Notification.
Rules of Interpretation of Tariff:Where description of an article or group of articles under a heading is preceded by “-“,such descriptions under “-” (single dash) are first to be considered for sub-classification under a Heading first, before proceeding to further classify under “–” (double dash). Articles whose description are preceded by a “—” (triple dash) or “—-” (quadruple dash) are sub classifications of the immediately preceding single dash or double dash, as the case may be.
Classification as per Customs Tariff Act, 1975:-‘Tips and ball of pens’, essentially are “parts” of refills. Therefore they cannot be classified in either as Ball point pens (960810) or Felt tipped and other porous-tipped pens and markers (960820) or Fountain pens, stylograph pens and other pens (960830) or Propelling or sliding pencils (960840) or Sets of articles from two or more of the foregoing sub-headings (960850) or Refills for ball point pens, comprising the ball point and ink-reservoir (960860). Hence, it has to be classified under “-Other”, which includes:
–960891: Pen nibs and nib points
— 9608 99: Other
Since, nibs and nib points are not similar to tips and the Applicant is in the business of manufacturing “ball-point pens” and not “fountain pens”, the classification of “tips and balls for pen” should fall under –9609 99: Other, which includes
 — 9608 99 10: Pen holders, pencil holders and similar holders
— 9608 99 90: Others
Since, “tips and balls of pens” are definitively not considered as part of “Pen holders, pencil holders and similar holders” they are to be classified under 9608 99 90: Others, under HSN 9608 and are to be taxed accordingly.
Classification as Rate Notification No. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 (as amended from time to time)-:In the Rate Notification ball point pens, classified under HSN 9608, are included under Sl No. 232 of Schedule II under the description: “pens other than fountain pens, stylograph pens”. The same Notification also mentions “fountain pens, stylograph pens” under Sl No. 447 of Schedule III. However, parts of pen, including “tips and balls of pens”, classifiable under HSN 9608 as discussed above, are not exempted or specifically included under entries of any other schedules. They are, therefore, to be included under Sl No. 453 of Schedule III and taxable @ 9% CGST and 9% SGST.

Decision:  Tips and Balls” of Ball Point Pens are to be classified under GST Tariff Heading 9608 99 90 and included under Sl No. 453 of Schedule III of Notification No. 01/2017–Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (corresponding State Notification No. 1125-FT dated 28/06/2017)
Comment:  The gist of the case is that Tips and Balls” of Ball Point Pens are to be classified under GST Tariff Heading 9608 99 90.
 
Prepared by:  Adit Gupta
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com