Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case law/2014-15/2261

Financial hardship is an additional factor to decide quantum of pre-deposit.

Case:-CITY CENTRAL MALL NASHIK P. LTD. VERSUS COMMR. OF SERVICE TAX, NASHIK

Citation:-2014(33) S.T.R. 232 (BOM.)

Brief Facts:-At the instance of the Counsel for the parties, the appeal is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. This appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order dated 28 October, 2013 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ("Tribu­nal") [2014 (33) S.T.R. 255 (Tribunal)].

The impugned order was passed on the appellant's application for dispensing with the pre-deposit of demand of Rs. 5.44 crores, interest thereon and equivalent penalty as imposed by order-in-original dated 24 September, 2013 of the Commissioner of Service Tax. This deposit of the amount confirmed by the order-in-original is mandatory unless dispensed with by the Tribunal under the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act read with Section 83 of Fi­nance Act, 1994. By the impugned order dated 28 October, 2013, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit by reversal 35% of the Cenvat credit amount availed in respect of capital goods in addition to an amount of Rs. 1.37 crores being the Cenvat credit taken on input which had already been reversed. This pre-deposit in the form of reversal of Cenvat credit was for the purposes of enter­taining the appellant's appeal on merits from the order-in-original dated 24 Sep­tember, 2013 of the Commissioner of Central Excise.

The appellant has got constructed a shopping mall at Nashik. In the construction of shopping mall, the appellant has inter alia availed of Cenvat cred­it in respect of Excise duty paid on capital goods, on inputs and input services used in/or in relation to the construction of mall. The appellant is now providing output services of renting of immovable properties at its shopping mall. The ap­pellant has utilized the Cenvat credit of tax availed in respect of capital goods, inputs and input services used in the construction of mall to discharge Service Tax on its output service of renting of immovable properties.

On 20 November, 2011, a show cause notice was issued to the appel­lant seeking to disallow the Cenvat credit availed and utilized in respect of capi­tal goods, inputs and input services totally amounting to Rs. 5.46 crores for the period from April, 2007 to March, 2011. The Commissioner of Central Excise by order dated 24 September, 2012 inter alia confirmed the demand of Rs. 5.46 crores besides imposing equivalent penalty and charging interest.

Being aggrieved by the order dated 24 September, 2012 the appellant filed an appeal to the Tribunal along with an application for dispensing with pre­-deposit of Cenvat credit of Rs. 5.46 crores. It is pertinent to note that the appel­lant had already reversed the credit of Rs. 1.37 crores in respect of inputs prior to the filing its appeal. The Tribunal by its impugned order dated 28 October, 2013 while disposing of the application for stay/dispensing with pre-deposit has di­rected the appellant to deposit amount of 35% of the credit availed on capital goods which comes to Rs. 79 lacs. This was in addition to the amount of Rs. 1.37 crores of Cenvat credit which had already been reversed in respect of inputs. This was on the basis of order in Galaxy Mercantile v. Commissioner of Central Ex­cise - 2013-TIOL-1442 = 2014 (33) S.T.R. 39 (Tribunal) passed by a co-ordinate bench of the Tribunal after having made a reference to a third member.

Appellant Contentions:-The grievance of the appellant against the impugned order of pre-deposit is that even though the Tribunal claims to follow its decision in Galaxy Mercantile Limited(supra) yet while directing pre-deposit it failed to follow the operative part of that decision without any reasons. In this case the Tribunal di­rected the appellant to deposit 35% on capital goods ignoring the fact that the appellant had already reversed an amount of Rs. 1.37 crores being the credit tak­en on inputs ignoring the fact that in Galaxy Mercantile (supra) a pre-deposit of 35% of the credit availed on the capital goods and inputs in the aggregate was directed to be deposited/reversed for the appeal being entertained on merits. Besides the appellant's plea of financial hardship (accumulated losses of Rs. 18.59 crores) was not considered in impugned order while directing pre-deposit.
 
Respondent Contentions:-As against the above, it is contended by the revenue that facts of the appellant's case are slightly different from the facts in the Galaxy Mercantile(su­pra) and therefore, the variation in the order of pre-deposit. It is submitted that in this case the appellant had engaged in the service of contractor to construct a mall. The contractor in turn availed the benefit of Notification No. 1/2006-S.T., dated 1 March, 2006 allowing payment of the Service Tax at a concessional rate subject to the condition that no Cenvat credit of duty on inputs and capital goods would be taken by the contractor. Therefore, in these circumstances, the order of the Tribunal is fair and no interference is called for.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:-We have considered the rival submissions. The Tribunal in the mat­ter of Galaxy Mercantile (supra) was dealing with the situation similar to that in the present case. In that case also a mall had been constructed by a contractor. The Service Tax on, the construction of the mall was paid at concessional rate un­der Works Contract (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007 on the condition that the contractor would not avail credit of duty paid on inputs used by him in the construction. The Tribunal in the case of Galaxy Mercantile (supra) took a view that reversal of credit/pre-deposit to the extent of 35% of the credit involved on inputs and capital goods would be sufficient for the purpose of entertaining the appeal on merits. At the prima facie stage we are of the view that the decision of the Tribunal in Galaxy Mercantile (supra) is applica­ble to the facts of this case. The distinction sought to be drawn by the revenue would be appropriately considered at the time of final hearing of the appeal. In the circumstances, as of now there is no justification to apply a different yard­stick from that applied in Galaxy Mercantile (supra) by the Tribunal at the stage of pre-deposit.

One more factor to be borne in mind in this case is that the appel­lant had pleaded financial hardship in pre-depositing the amount of demand as it had accumulated losses the extent of Rs. 18.59 crores as on 31 March, 2013. In the case ofGalaxy Mercantile (supra) there was no financial hardship pleaded be­fore the Tribunal.This is an additional factor which impels us to modify the im­pugned order so as to be in line with the earlier order of the Tribunal in Galaxy Mercantile (supra). We therefore direct that on the appellant depositing 35% of the credit availed on capital goods and inputs in the aggregate, (that is also con­sidering the amount of Rs. 1.37 crores already deposited), the Tribunal would hear the appeal on merits.

Time to make the deposit is extended upto 30 January, 2014. On the Tribunal being satisfied that the deposit as directed by this Court has been made, the appeal would be taken up for final disposal, in its turn by the Tribunal.

Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of in the above terms. No order as to costs.

Decision:-Appeal disposed off.

Comment:- The gist of this case is that for deciding the quantum of pre-deposit, apart from considering the prima facie case, the plea of financial hardship is also equally required to be examined. Due to the reason that there were financial losses, the pre-deposit of 35% of the total credit was ordered in light of the decision given in similar circumstances in the case of Galaxy Mercantile.

Prepared by: Hushen Ganodwala

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com