Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2011-12/1353

Extended period of Limitation - invoking of

Case: KAY KAY PRESS METAL CORPORATION Versus COMMR. OF CEN. EX., VALSAD
 
Citation: 2011 (270) E.L.T. 691 (Tri. - Ahmd.)
 
Issue:- Extended period cannot be invoked when asseessee is under bonafide belief based on Tribunal or Court’s decisions.
 
Brief Facts:- Appellant was undertaking the activities such as cutting, bending, punching on duty paid articles, plates or channels. Revenue alleged that the said activities amounted to manufacture and issued show cause notice in 2003 for the period 1998-1999 to 1999-2000.
 
The Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand of duty of Rs. 41,04,217/- and impose penalty of identical amount.
 
Hence, appellant is before the Tribunal.
 
Appellant’s Contention:- Appellant have relied upon the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Continental Foundation Jt. Venture v. CCE, Chandigarh [2007 (216) E.L.T. 177 (S.C.)] wherein it was observed that when there is a bona fide doubt as to non-excisability of the goods due to diver­gent views of the Courts, extended period of 5 years cannot be invoked and more failure or negligence in not taking licence or not paying duty, is not suffi­cient to invoke extended period.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:- The Tribunal noted that the issue is no more res integra and stands settled against the appellant on merit by the Larger Bench in the case of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. CCE, Aurangabad [2005 (190) E.L.T. 301 (Tri.-LB)].
 
The Tribunal observed that though there are certain disputes about the factual position in the present case as to whether the appellant themselves have carried out the processes or they have got it done through job worker, but the present appeal can be disposed off on the point of time bar.
 
It was noted that the period in­volved is 1998-2000, whereas the Show Cause Notice was issued in 2003. During the relevant period, various decisions of the Tribunal were to the effect that such activity of cutting, bending, and punching duty paid articles, plates or channels does not amount to manufacture. It was only subsequently that the matter was referred to Larger Bench in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Collr,  CE., Jaipur v. Man Structurals Ltd. [2001 (130) E.L.T. 401 (S.C.)].
 
It was noted that the Larger Bench decision of the Tribunal took notice of the earlier decisions of the Tribunal in the case of Aruna Industries v. Collr., C.E. - 1986 (25) E.L.T. 580 (Tri.) as also many other decisions of Tribunal including the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Wainganga Sahkari S. Karkhana Ltd. v. Commissioner [2002 (50) RLT 177 (Tribunal)], as affirmed by the Supreme Court [2002 (142) E.L.T. 12 (S.C.)].
 
As such, it is clear that during the relevant period, various deci­sions and judgments held the activity as not amounting to manufacture. As such, we are only required to deal with the plea of limitation.
 
The Tribunal noted that the Tribunal's decision in the case of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. CCE, Aurangabad [2000 (201) E.L.T. 27 (Tri.-Del.)] had the same effect as the judgment relied upon the assessee herein, wherein it was laid down that where the appellant is under bona fide belief that parts of structures are not excisable and such impression of non-excisability prevailed during the material period amongst assesses and officers. Inasmuch as, decisions during the material period were favouring the assessee, the charge of suppression of fact is not sus­tainable and extended period is not invokable. Similarly, reliance was placed on the case of Mail Mark Nun yarn v. CCE, Chennai - 2009 (241) E.L.T. 422 (Tri. - Chennai), it was held that divergent views prevailing on excisability of Shikakai Powder, with differ­ent High Courts having held different views on the issue, the appellants can be said to be under bona fide belief and extended period of limitation cannot be in­voked.
 
It was held that the law on the issue is clear i.e. to the effect that when there are divergent views, many of which are in favour of the assessee holding the field, no suppression or mis-statement can be attributed to the assessee, to entertain the same belief. As admittedly, in the present case, judgment prior to Larger Bench in the case of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., were laying that the proc­esses allegedly adopted by the appellant did not amount to manufacture, the tribunal is of the view that the demand raised beyond the period of limitation, by invoking extended period, is barred. As such, irrespective of the fact as to whether the ap­pellants themselves have undertaken the said activity or not, the demand is re­quired to be quashed on the above issue itself.
 
As the Tribunal has already held the demand as barred by limitation and the impugned order is required to be set aside on this ground, the Tribunal finds no justification for impo­sition of penalty on the appellant. The same is also set aside.
 
Decision:- Appeal allowed.
 
Comment:- This decision is clearly bringing the landmark analogy that when a manufacturer has acted on the basis of decisions of tribunal and High Courts and has not paid the duty then the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked. This means that the allegation of willful suppression, fraud etc. with an intent to evade payment of duty cannot be alleged in such cases.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com