Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2011-12/1273

Documents recovered and statement of employee recorded could be relied as evidence in the court, if the same is confirmed by Managing Director or whether the opportunity to cross examine the witness has to be given?
Case: - SHALINI STEELS PVT. LTD. Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD
 
Citation: - 2011 (269) E.L.T. 485 (A.P.)

Issue:- Documents recovered and statement of employee recorded could be relied as evidence in the court, if the same is confirmed by Managing Director or whether the opportunity to cross examine the witness has to be given?

Brief Facts:- Appellant company, its Managing Director, one of its Directors and others were alleged to have been involved in clandestine production and clearance of its final product i.e., CTD bars, and it was alleged that they had suppressed receipt of raw materials i.e., M.S. Ingots. Search of the factory premises was conducted and documentary evidence was collected and statements of several persons were recorded.

The Commissioner passed an order confirming demand under Section 11-A (1) of the Central Excise Act. Penalty was also imposed under Section 11-AB of the Act. In additional, penalty was also imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

In appeal before the Tribunal, it was noted that the document recovered from Sri Om Prakash Sharma which reflected a true account of the transaction in MS Ingots and CTD Bars which were clandestinely cleared by the appellant; the contents of the documents, recovered from Sri Om Prakash Sharma, and other employees of the Appellant company, were accepted by the Managing Director of the Appellant Company as being correct. It was held that the evidentiary value of these documents recovered from Sri Om Prakash Sharma was not produced for cross-examination by the appellant and it was noted that he was not a third party witness totally removed from the Transactions of the assessee. It was held that the appellant was a person and its executives and employees could not, appropriately, be labeled as third party witnesses. It was held that Commissioner had rightly relied on the documents recovered from Sri Om Prakash Sharma to find illicit removal of CTD bars on the intervening night of 25/26th September, 2003 and the demand of duty and imposition of equal amount of penalty under Section of 11-AC, was sustainable. 

Aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal, the appellant have filed appeal before the High Court. 

Appellant’s Contention:- Appellant contend that the Tribunal had erred in law in taking into account, as evidence, the unproved written matter said to have been recovered from Sri Om Prakash Sharma, even though he was not presented for cross examination and other than this statement, there was no supportive or corroborative evidence in support of the allegation levelled against the Appellant company. Appellant placed reliance on Sunder Ispat Limited v. Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise-2002 (141) E.L.T. 24 (A.P.H.C.D.B.); and Lakshman Export Limited v. Collector of Central Excise-2002 (143) E.L.T. 21 (S.C.).

Reasoning of Judgment:- The statement of Sri Om Prakash Sharma was relied upon by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, in demanding payment of excise duty by, and in levying penalty on, the appellant. The statement of Sri Om Prakash Sharma, who was an employee of the Appellant company, was accepted to be true by none other than the managing Director of the Appellant company. It is evident, therefore, that no prejudice was caused to the appellant on their being denied the opportunity of cross-examination Sri Om Prakash Sharma when its Managing Director had himself accepted the said statement to be true. Even otherwise nothing prevented the Appellant Company, if they so chose, from producing Sri Om Prakash Sharma, as a witness in their defence and to examine him on their behalf. It is evident therefore , that this plea of denial of opportunity to cross-examine Sri Om Prakash Sharma is an afterthought, and was raised only to wriggle out of the demand of excise duty and the penalty levied on them.

 
Decision:- Appeal dismissed. 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com