Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2012-13/1523

Denial of benefit of SFIS scheme when imported goods are received after expiry date of authorization certificate.

Case: - P. S. G. STEEL PVT. LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA

Citation: - 2013 (288) E.L.T. 338 (Del.)

Brief Facts: -The Appellant claims a direction in the nature of mandamus to the first respondent to issue in­structions to revalidate its scrip which entitled it to customs duty concessions for a period of six months in terms of Serve From India Scheme (SFIS). The benefici­aries of that policy, like the Appellant are entitled to exemption from customs duty in respect of capital goods imported during the period of the scrip's au­thorization. In this case, the scrip was issued to the Appellant on 15-4-2009 and was valid in terms of the scheme till 30-4-2011. The Appellant, who had availed of the facility of the customs duty exemption in terms of the SFIS, had apparently entered into contract for pur­chase of certain equipment from Italy on 18-4-2011. The goods were shipped on 18-4-2011 from Antwerp and landed at the Inland Container Depot, Faridabad on 26-5-2011. By this time, the validity of the scrip had expired (on 30-4-2011). The Appellant was, therefore, required to pay duty. It is urged that the Appellant was asked to seek revalidation of the scrip under the SFIS which it did. Apparently, the request for revalidation was turned down by the Policy Relaxation Committee (PRC) on 29-8-2011.
 
Appellant Contention:- The Appellant contended that the shipment ought to have been cleared duty free as the valid­ity in terms of the said advertisement would extend till that time the goods landed.
 
Respondent Contention: - The Respondent contended that terms of the scrip were clear as was evident from the reading of the Handbook of Procedure. In response, it is further argued that the validity period and revalidation is in terms of paragraph 3.11.7 which reads as follows:-
"3.11.7 Duty Credit scrip shall be valid for a period of 24 months. Revali­dation of Duty Credit scrip shall not be permitted unless covered under paragraph 2.13.1 or paragraph 2.13.2A of HBP v1."
Counsel also relies upon paragraph 2.13.1 which is in the following terms :-
"However, revalidation of freely transferable Authorization/Duty credit scrips and stock and sale Authorization shall not be permitted unless valid­ity has expired while in custody of Customs authority/RA."

Reasoning of Judgment: -We have considered the both sided parties. The terms of the SFIS and the authorization issued under it were clear i.e. that the benefits could be availed for the period of two years. In case of shipment on high seas, the policy provided the extension of concession if the validity period lapsed when the shipment had landed at any Indian port. In other words, in the present case, if the goods had reached in the India by the date of expiry of the authorization i.e. 30-4-2011, the Appellant could have qualified for extension to facilitate their clearance. However, such was not the case. The goods in fact reached on 26-5- 2011, a fact known to the Appellant when it booked them after entering into con­tract with the foreign supplier, on 18-4-2011. Having regard to these circum­stances, the respondents' action directing payment of full duty and refusal to give the benefit cannot be characterized as unreasonable. It was brought to the notice of the Court that the order of the Policy Relaxation Committee (PRC) is appealable under Section 15 of the Foreign Trade Development Act, 1992 to the Central Government. This Court is of the opinion that the Appellant should be permitted to avail of that remedy. In case there is any delay, the said authority shall consider the appeal on its merits provided the Appellant approaches it within a period of two weeks from today. In view of the above conclusions, this Court is of the opinion that the relief claimed cannot be granted. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed but subject to the above directions.
 
Decision: -Appeal Dismissed.

Comment:- The analogy drawn from this case is that benefit of concessional duty under SFIS is not available when the imported goods reached India after the expiry of authorisation certificate. However, extension could have been granted if the goods reached India on the expiry date itself which was not the case.
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com