Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2012-13/1490

Demanding excise duty from the legal heirs of deceased proprietor is not legal.

Case:- COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CHANDIGARH Versus SHREE AMBICA STEEL INDUSTRIES
 
Citation:- 2013 (288) E.L.T. 420 (Tri.-Del.)
                                                                                                                    
Brief Facts:-M/s. Ambica Steel Industries was sole proprietorship concern of one Smt. Bimla Devi. She died on 17-9-2006. Her legal heirs after her death got registration of the respondent under the Excise Act cancelled vide letter dated 18-10-2006. At the time of cancellation of registration, they submitted an undertaking to the de­partment, which is reproduced thus:- "That Smt. Bimla Rani W/o Sh. Mohinder Kumar who was the sole pro­prietor of M/s. Shri Ambica Steel Industries, Amloh Road, Mandi Gobind­garh, expired on 17-9-2006. That we are the legal heirs of all the assets and liabilities of late Smt. Bimla Rani. That we un-conditionally undertake to pay all the pending Central Excise Duty liability of M/s. Shri Ambica Steel Industries, Amloh Road, Mandi Gobindgarh as and when these dues are finally settled. That we undertake not to dispose of the assets till the Central Excise Duty liability is finally settled." Pursuant to the application and undertaking, registration of the re­spondent-company was cancelled. Subsequently, a show cause notice was issued in the name of the respondent-company raising a Cenvat credit on the premise that the respondent-company during the period April, 2005 to Feb., 2006 had wrongly availed Cenvat credit in respect of the inputs not received in the factory. The demand was ultimately confirmed by the jurisdictional Addl. Commissioner vide order-in-original.
 
Appellant Contentions:-The Revenue had challenged the impugned order on the ground that the Commissioner (Appeals) have wrongly dropped the demand ignoring the fact that at the time of getting the registration of the respondent-company cancelled, the legal heirs of the proprietor of the respon­dent-company submitted unconditional undertaking to pay all the pending cen­tral excise duty dues of the respondent-company and also not to dispose of the assets of the company till the central excise duty liability is finally settled. Revenue is contended that by filing that undertaking, the legal heirs of the respondent took upon themselves of the duty liability of the respondent-company. As such, now they cannot be allowed to contend that the demand has been wrongly confirmed against them.

Respondent Contentions:-The respondent on the con­trary has pressed for dismissal of appeal. Respondent contends that it is well settled that the recovery proceedings against a deceased assessee cannot be initiated and maintained. Admittedly, in this case sole proprietor of the respondent-company died in September, 2006 and with her death, the company became non ­functional. It is submitted that the undertaking was given by the legal heirs of the deceased Bimla Rani on the insistence of the Excise Authorities and said undertaking related only to existing excise duty liability or some pending demand under adjudication. Ld. Counsel submits that show cause notice raising demand was issued much after the undertaking given by the legal heirs of Smt. Bimla Devi (sic), sole proprietor of the assessee-firm, as such it cannot be termed as demand pending adjudication when the undertaking was given. Thus it is pleaded that the Commissioner (Appeals) have rightly allowed the appeal of the respondent-company.

Reasoning of Judgment:-We have considered the rival contentions and perused the records. Undisputedly, late Smt. Bimla Rani was the proprietor of the respondent-firm M/s. Shree Ambica Steel Industries. She died and after her death the legal heir applied for cancellation of Excise registration in the name of the firm and the registration was admittedly cancelled by the Department in Octo­ber, 2006. It is well settled that a sole proprietorship concern has no legal entity independent of its proprietor. Thus it is obvious that the death of the respondent-company ceased to exist. That being the case, the relevant show cause notice issued to M/s. Shree Ambica Steel Industries, Mandi Gobindgarh is bad in law as it was issued against any non-existent firm. This circumstance in itself is sufficient to dismiss the appeal filed by the Depart­ment. Coming to the undertaking by the legal heir of sole proprietor of the respondent-firm on perusal of the undertaking reproduced above, we find that legal heir of the deceased sole proprietor of the respondent-firm had undertaken to pay all the pending central excise liability of the respondent-firm as and when the dues are finally settled. From this it is evident that the undertaking was given in respect of pending dues under dispute. In the instant case, the show cause no­tice raising demand was issued almost three years after the undertaking. This imply that the dispute pertaining to the demand in question was raised much after the undertaking as such the demand which is subject matter of the show cause notice cannot be termed as pending as covered by the undertak­ing given by the legal heir. That being the case, we are of the view that there was no reason for issue of show cause notice against non-existing firm. As such, the demand confirmed on the basis of aforesaid show cause notice cannot be sus­tained. We do not find any infirmity in the order-in-appeal setting aside the or­der-in-original and dropping the demand.
 
Decision:-Appeal dismissed.
 
Comment:-The substance of this case is that demand cannot be raised against the legal heirs when the sole proprietor of the proprietorship concern expired and demand was raised much after the death of the deceased due to the sole reason that proprietor and proprietorship concern are single entity.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com