Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   Higher oil prices, GST may boost states revenue by Rs 37,400 crore in FY19  *   These taxpayers no more at mercy of GST intermediaries *  Budget 2018: No fiscal derailment, but a lot rides on GST; expect caution from RBI *  GST: E-way bill implementation deferred due to glitches *  Homebuyers must avoid traps on the name of NO GST Impact *   Govt will formulate a comprehensive gold policy to develop gold as an asset class *   Government to evolve to asign a unique id to every individual enterprise. *   1.48 lakh crore for rail budget. *   7148 Crore to be sanctioned to textile sector. *   3700 corore for SME industry *  16000 crore for free electricity connection *   Government ignored warnings over GST rollout: sources *  GSTR 3B questionaire introduced- To be filled before filing return *  Advisory mail  to all the taxpayers received from GSTN *   Advisory group on GST submits report, suggests changes *   GST lifted oil demand on higher vehicle sales, says report *   Moody’s gives thumbs up to GST, demonetisation  *   Pass on rate cut benefits immediately, companies tell traders *   Focus will now be on simplifying forms, IT processes under GST: Sushil Modi *  Tax rates lowered on consumer goods,only luxury goods taxed @ 28% *   Businesses can revise GST transition claim form now *  Multiplex owners in UP demand clarity on refund as tax exemptions go away after GST *   GST compliance: A case of much ado about nothing *  PM hints more relief for traders & businesses to ease GST compliance burden *  Infosys deploys more people in states to ease GSTN load *   Further reforms are needed for the GST to succeed *   GST impact! Massive stock clearance discounts on apparels, gadgets likely in December *  Kerala HC releases Detained Goods since State has No Power to make Rules to regulate Inter-State movement of Goods under GST *  Infosys is to blame for GST Network glitches, say government officials *   Publishers versus authors: Who will pay GST on royalty?
Subject News *  GST Council to discuss annual return forms; experts expect reconciliation with ITR. *  Panel Of Ministers Mulls 1% Cess On Luxury Items, Tobacco To Help Farmers *  GST Council to consider rate cut on items with low revenue impact on July 21 *  E-way bills have increased our, liability – transporter says *  One year of GST: the successes,failures and what's next on the agenda *  GST Rate cuts could come sooner *  GST Is Not All That Bad-small Businesses  *  Govement Extends Sale Of Pre-GST Goods With Stickers Of Revised Price Till July 31 *  Government Collects Rs 95,610 Crore GST In May *  28th GST Council Meeting Date announced *  Rs. 672 Crore Worth GST Evasion Detected In Jaipur *  Rs 38,062 Crore Refund Claims of Exporters were cleared Till June 16 *   Finance Ministry Likely to Launch Annual GST Return Forms in Next Council Meet *   Taxpayers can now change email, mobile number under GST system. Here's how to do it  *  Rs 70-bn GST refunds of exporters cleared *  Gujarat tops e-way bill collection since April *  Tax authorities send notices to businesses for less IGST input credit claim *  Petrol, diesel rates: Reduction in oil duties best solution to check fuel price rise *  GST council to discuss about bringing natural Gas in GST *   GST Council is working towards rationalizing GST rates *  GST Council approves monthly return filing system to come into force in six months. *  No E-way Bill is required in West Bengal for Intrastate *  Rate notified on PSLC and REC   *  No Late Fee for Delayed filing of  GSTR-5A - Non Resident OIDAR Service Providers *  CBIC clears double taxation under GST kept in bonded warehouses *  Update on New Functionality on GST Portal : Tracking ARN for Exports  *   RBI policy: GST-hit small business get more time, money *   GST’s e-way bill set for a month-end rollout after tech glitches pushed it off-track on Feb 1 *  GST on Bitcoin-Crypto currency trade may get taxed 18% *  GST on Electric Car Batteries Could Come Down Drastically  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-2017/3448

Demand of differential duty on the amount of freight charged by the assessee for transportation of explosives to coal fields.

Case:-COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., NAGPUR-II Versus SOLAR EXPLOSIVES LTD.

Citation:-2017 (345) E.L.T. 136 (Tri. - Mumbai)

Brief facts:-The issue involved in this case was regarding the demand of differential duty from the respondent on the amount of freight charged by them for transportation of explosives to various coal fields. The contention of Revenue was that the duty liability arises on transportation charges so collected by the respondent for outward journey and return journey. Thus, the deduction on account of transportation charges collected by the respondent was not admissible to them as the freight charges. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand raised with interest and also imposed penalty. On an appeal, the first appellate authority by impugned order had set aside the order-in-original and allowed the appeal filed by the respondent.

Appellant’s contention:-Learned DR assailed the order and submitted that the duty liability arose on the transportation of the explosives from the factory premises to the coal fields and it had been collected by issuing commercial invoices. He would rely upon the Board’s Circular No. 643/34/2002-CX., dated 1-7-2002 wherein Board had clarified that outward and inward journey was liable to be taxed. It was his submission that the respondent had supplied the explosives to the coal fields based upon the contract which was entered into after tendering for the supply of explosives. As per the terms of the contract, the explosives were to be supplied at the coal field as required hence the cost of transportation charged separately by the respondent is liable to be included in the value of the goods for discharge of Central Excise duty.

Respondent’s contention:-Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise v. Ispat Industries Ltd. - 2015 (324) E.L.T. 670 (S.C.) has held that the freight charges cannot be included in the assessable value on the ground that the sale took place at the buyer’s place. He also submitted that on factual matrix the invoices raised clearly indicate that the freight charges for which the deduction was allowed as per Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000.

Reasoning of judgment:-The Tribunal found that Revenue’s case had no merits inasmuch as the period involved in the case in hand was from July, 2000 to June, 2004. During the period, duty liability had to be discharged on the basis of transaction value and the transaction between the respondent and coal field for supply of explosives was as per the value contracted by both the parties. The contract also emphasised the transportation of explosives to the coal field which was done so by the respondent using their own specialized vehicle. They saw the specimen invoice copy produced by the learned Counsel and noted that duty paying documents were indicating separately the value for the transportation. The first appellate authority in the impugned order in unnumbered paragraph, in internal Page No. 9 of the order specifically recorded that the adjudicating authority had verified the invoices and collected the freight charges indicating on the invoices itself. If that be so, they found that the provisions of Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, were directly applicable in the case in hand, wherein it was provided that the transport cost need not to be included in the assessable value if it was billed on the invoice and collected. It was not the case of the Revenue that the respondent had billed for more transportation charges than actually paid by them. In the absence of contrary evidence indicating that the respondent collected excess freight, they had to hold that the provisions of Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules had complied with and the excess of transportation charges need not to be included in the assessable value for discharge of additional excess duty.

Decision:-Appeal rejected.

Comment:-The gist of the case was that the assessee was engaged in manufacturing explosives and also transports the explosives to the coal fields. The Department demanded differential duty from the respondent on the amount of freight charged by them for transportation of explosives to various coal fields. The assessee contended that freight charges were incurred for transportation of goods up to buyer’s premises. Further, the freight charges were shown separately in the invoices and collected from buyer of goods, hence, not to be included in assessable value in absence of evidence of charging excess freight than shown in the invoices. It was held that the assessee was not required to pay the amount of duty in accordance with Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000.
Prepared by:-Praniti Lalwani

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com