Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   Non-Tariff Charges Except Cheque Dishonour Fee is exempted from GST: AAAR *   GST: Rs 50,000 crore tax shortfall upsets budget maths *   Arun Jaitley favours GST council-like structure for healthcare, agriculture   *   Traders are not Annoyed with GST, CAIT Writes to Rahul Gandhi   *   March GST collection may touch Rs 1 lakh crore *   For biscuit companies, this is how the cookie crumbles post GST *   No arrest can be made without following procedures in GST evasion cases: HC *   White goods firms under NAA lens for pocketing GST rate cuts   *   Cos can raise product weight in lieu of price cut to pass on GST benefit   *   GST could have been implemented after trial run: Singhvi   *   DRI detects Rs 3.25 cr tax evasion in sale of complimentary IPL tickets   *   Jaitley: Consensus is the secret behind GST’s success   *   Starbucks may face fine for ‘profiteering’ after GST rate cut *   Simpler GST turns out to be bad business for India’s tax consultants   *  Cloudtail India fined Rs 11 lakh by GST anti-profiteering authority *  GSTN Alert: Two New Features added in the Portal *   GST: TVS Motor joins Hero MotoCorp to seek reduction in rate on two-wheelers *   SPARC gets GST notice for ₹46.04 crore *   GST on service sector: Vague orders by advance ruling authorities spell trouble *   Jubilant FoodWorks slapped with Rs 41.42 crore Demand by GST Anti-Profiteering Authority *   Kerala High Court dismisses 3,250 Petitions challenging VAT Assessments post GST *  Rs 230-crore GST scam by Tamil Nadu steel traders unearthed *  Telcos seek GST waiver on payments to govt, Rs 35K-cr input credit adjustment *  Domino's Pizza fined for not passing GST rate cut benefits to customers   *  Patanjali dealer fined for not passing on GST rate cut to consumers *  Foxconn awaiting Rs 1,000 crore GST refund *   Hyderabad: Probe reveals shell firms floated only for GST fraud *  Firm evades Rs 1.27-crore GST; proprietor booked *   Tax Rate on Fly Ash Bricks:- Condition of 90% or more fly ash content *  Ahmedabad CGST officials bust fake GST invoice racket worth Rs 175 crore
Subject News *   Discounts granted must be deducted from Invoice Value to avail Input Tax Credit: AAR *   Lodging along with Food to Students by a Private Boarding House is a Composite Supply, 18% GST applicable: AAR *   Gold Schemes Offered to Customers not eligible for GST Input Tax Credit: AAR  *   GSTN adds New Feature in Portal *   GST: Solar heater parts taxed at 18% *   GST Council's plan for real estate sector may not find many takers   *   Relief to exporters; govt extends IGST, compensation cess exemption for various export plans   *   Consumer Goods Makers Won’t Be Taxed On Buy-One-Get-One-Free Offers *   GST: Unused ITC for half-built houses to be reversed *   GST tribunal proposed at Allahabad, regional benches in 19 districts: Govt   *   GST officials detect tax fraud of Rs 224 cr by 8 companies *   GST appellate body clears air on tax credit for sweet shop vs restaurant *   GST Council to meet on March 19 to finalise real estate tax structure *  Government has said : GST does not apply on the TCS amount *  Solar power generation 5.8 per cent costlier with GST: Report  *  The Federation of Automobile Dealers Associations Seeking Rollback Of GST Amendments *  Government notified April 1 Date Set For Availing Increased GST Exemption Limit, Composition Scheme *  New GST return forms released; compliance process simplified from April 1 *  Realtors seek clarity on GST exemption on development rights *  Govt issues order on ‘removal of difficulties’ in GST *  GST collections drop to Rs 97,247 cr in Feb; rate cuts may have hit mop-up *  There are dark clouds on the horizon when it comes to GST *  GST: DGGI seizes record of Yarn Firms in Ludhiana *  GST Evasion worth Rs 650 crore unearthed in Maharashtra *  GST: Delhi Govt targets Rs 29,000 crore Revenue for Next Year *  Breaking shackles: How GST ended the era of captive warehousing *  Transparency and simplicity in the tax regime are casualties of the GST Council’s recent decisions. *  Reduction in GST rate leads to a drop in price? Real estate a test case for broader changes *  With GST rate cut, you have another reason to buy a house *  GST Commissionerate Hails Mahesh Babu  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-2017/3448

Demand of differential duty on the amount of freight charged by the assessee for transportation of explosives to coal fields.

Case:-COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., NAGPUR-II Versus SOLAR EXPLOSIVES LTD.

Citation:-2017 (345) E.L.T. 136 (Tri. - Mumbai)

Brief facts:-The issue involved in this case was regarding the demand of differential duty from the respondent on the amount of freight charged by them for transportation of explosives to various coal fields. The contention of Revenue was that the duty liability arises on transportation charges so collected by the respondent for outward journey and return journey. Thus, the deduction on account of transportation charges collected by the respondent was not admissible to them as the freight charges. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand raised with interest and also imposed penalty. On an appeal, the first appellate authority by impugned order had set aside the order-in-original and allowed the appeal filed by the respondent.

Appellant’s contention:-Learned DR assailed the order and submitted that the duty liability arose on the transportation of the explosives from the factory premises to the coal fields and it had been collected by issuing commercial invoices. He would rely upon the Board’s Circular No. 643/34/2002-CX., dated 1-7-2002 wherein Board had clarified that outward and inward journey was liable to be taxed. It was his submission that the respondent had supplied the explosives to the coal fields based upon the contract which was entered into after tendering for the supply of explosives. As per the terms of the contract, the explosives were to be supplied at the coal field as required hence the cost of transportation charged separately by the respondent is liable to be included in the value of the goods for discharge of Central Excise duty.

Respondent’s contention:-Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise v. Ispat Industries Ltd. - 2015 (324) E.L.T. 670 (S.C.) has held that the freight charges cannot be included in the assessable value on the ground that the sale took place at the buyer’s place. He also submitted that on factual matrix the invoices raised clearly indicate that the freight charges for which the deduction was allowed as per Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000.

Reasoning of judgment:-The Tribunal found that Revenue’s case had no merits inasmuch as the period involved in the case in hand was from July, 2000 to June, 2004. During the period, duty liability had to be discharged on the basis of transaction value and the transaction between the respondent and coal field for supply of explosives was as per the value contracted by both the parties. The contract also emphasised the transportation of explosives to the coal field which was done so by the respondent using their own specialized vehicle. They saw the specimen invoice copy produced by the learned Counsel and noted that duty paying documents were indicating separately the value for the transportation. The first appellate authority in the impugned order in unnumbered paragraph, in internal Page No. 9 of the order specifically recorded that the adjudicating authority had verified the invoices and collected the freight charges indicating on the invoices itself. If that be so, they found that the provisions of Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, were directly applicable in the case in hand, wherein it was provided that the transport cost need not to be included in the assessable value if it was billed on the invoice and collected. It was not the case of the Revenue that the respondent had billed for more transportation charges than actually paid by them. In the absence of contrary evidence indicating that the respondent collected excess freight, they had to hold that the provisions of Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules had complied with and the excess of transportation charges need not to be included in the assessable value for discharge of additional excess duty.

Decision:-Appeal rejected.

Comment:-The gist of the case was that the assessee was engaged in manufacturing explosives and also transports the explosives to the coal fields. The Department demanded differential duty from the respondent on the amount of freight charged by them for transportation of explosives to various coal fields. The assessee contended that freight charges were incurred for transportation of goods up to buyer’s premises. Further, the freight charges were shown separately in the invoices and collected from buyer of goods, hence, not to be included in assessable value in absence of evidence of charging excess freight than shown in the invoices. It was held that the assessee was not required to pay the amount of duty in accordance with Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000.
Prepared by:-Praniti Lalwani

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com