Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2012-13/1507

Criteria to decide liability to pay Service Tax as C & F Agent is that C & F Agent is not free to sell the goods on his own.

Case:- COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI Versus D.R.POLYMERS

Citation:-  2013 (29) S.T.R 536 (Tri.-Del.)

                                                                                         

Brief Facts:-Being aggrieved with the order of Commissioner vide which he has dropped the Show Cause Notice issue to the respondent, Revenue has filed the present appeal. It is noted that Show Cause Notice dated 10-8-2004, was issued to the respondent raising demand of service tax for the period 19-19-2003 alleging that during the said period, they have provided services of C & F agent to M/s.Bayer ABC Ltd.

Reasoning of Judgment:Tribunal has considered submission from both the sides and finds that Commissioner has gone through the agreements entered into by the respondent and their principals and has held as follows:

“The arrangement between them would be that of principal and the agent and not as a buyer and seller of the goods. In the instant case it is observed that the party though was receiving, storing  and transporting the goods as well as maintaining the records, but the basic agreement between them is to sell the goods by the party on its own to their customer and not as per the directions of the principal. In the other words, the party is free to choose its own customer and sell on arm’s length basis.  This fact is further  fortified by the Clauses of the agreement wherein it is stated that “Apart from the monthly consolidated sales of stock statement you shall be required to submit the sales & stock statement on 20th of the same month and 5th of the next month giving details of sales effected…..”

This Clause further confirms the fact that the principal was at liberty to transfer the goods to another agent or to sell directly in case the goods were not sold by party within a specified period. These facts have also been corroborated by general manager (finance) of M/s. Bayer ABC Ltd. vide letter dated 31-7-2003 and statement dated 30-1-2004. Thus, it is amply clear and evident that the party was required to sell and not dispatch the goods as per the directions of the principal. Moreover, there is no evidence explicitly and implicitly provided in the agreement that the goods were to be dispatched to the customers in accordance with the directions of the principals or the owners of goods. The agreement merely state that the goods were to be sold within stipulated period and not in the form of distribution or dispatching the goods as directed by the principals. Further, it is also observed that there is no allegation to this extent in the impugned SCN.

While arriving at this conclusion, the Commissioner (Appeal) has also referred to-and relied upon the Board’s Circular No. 59/8/2003-S.T., dated 26-6-2003. Accordingly he has held that in as much as the assessee was not selling the goods on behalf of the principal, on commissioning basis, he could not be held to be ‘C & F’ agents. The arrangement between the respondent and the principal is for causing sale on behalf of the principal. He also relied upon Tribunals decisions in the case of CCE, Allahabad v. M/s. Chandan Chemicals – 2007- TIOL-724-CESTAT-DEL = 2007(7) S.T.R.578 (Tri.-Del.), as  also on the Tribunal decisions in the case of Mahavir Generic  v. CCE – 2007(6) STT 523- CESTAT(Del.CCE) = 2006 (3) S.T.R.  276(Tri.- Del.), as also in the case of CCE v. M/s. Parekh Apparels Ltd. – (2008) 13 STT 15 (AHD-CESTAT)  = 2008(9) S.T.R.87 (Tri.-Ahmd.). By taking note of the above decisions, Tribunal has held as under:

These facts are quite akin to the present case. After noting the above facts the Tribunal held that C & F agent normally  receives the dispatch order from principal and arranges dispatch of the goods as per the direction of the principal and prepares invoice on behalf of the principal. The party, in the present case, does not receive the dispatch orders from the principal and does not arrange dispatch of the goods as per the direction of the principal. The Hon’ble Tribunal has rejected the appeal filed by the Revenue.

Since, it is further evident that the commission, ORC and discounts were towards the impugned services i.e.  causing sale of goods of the principal/owners of the goods such consideration is not towards provision of taxable services under ‘C & F’ agent.

Hence, the demand of impugned Service Tax as stated in the SCN under Section 73 of the Act ibid and interest thereon under Section 75 of the Act ibid is not sustainable as the alleged demand does not exist for the aforementioned reasons.

The issue required to be decided in the present appeal of the Revenue is as to whether the respondent can be held to clearing and forwarding agent of their principal. We find that scope of the said services was clarified by the Board as contained in Trade Notice No. 87/97(10/Service Tax /97, dated 14-7-1997 issue by Madurai-2 Commissionerate.  It stands observed as under in paraghraph 2 do the said Circular:

“Normally, there is a contract between the principal and clearing and forwarding agent detailing the terms and conditions and also indicating the commission or remuneration to which the C & F agent is entitled.  A clearing and forwarding agent normally undertakes the following :

(a)   Receiving the goods from the factories or premises of the principals or his agents;

(b)  Warehousing these goods;
(c)   Receiving dispatch orders from the principal
(d)  Arranging dispatch of goods as per the directions of the principal by engaging transport on his own or through the authorized transporters of the principal;
(e)   Maintaining records of the receipts and dispatch of goods and the stock available at the warehouse;
(f)    Preparing invoices on behalf of the principal.”
 

As is seen from above, C & F agent receives dispatch orders from the principal and prepares the invoice on behalf of the principal. He is not free to sell the goods on his own.  It was held that C & F agent services are essentially in connection with clearing and forwarding operations of the principal.

 

In view of the terms of the agreement between the respondent and their principal, we note that the respondents were free to sell the goods to their own customers and were not merely dispatching the goods on the orders of their principal. Further, the invoice was being issued by the respondent themselves.

 

The Revenue reliance upon the Tribunal’s decisions in the case CCE, Chandigarh v. ADH Agencies reported as 2007 (7) S.T.R. 660 (Tri.-Del.), cannot be appreciated in as much as the said decisions was based upon Tribunals Larger Bench decisions in the case of Medpro Pharma, which already stands set-aside by the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana and confirmed by Apex Court, as detailed above.

In view of the foregoing decisions we find no infirmity in the impugned order of Commissioner, Accordingly revenue’s appeal is rejected.

Decision:- The revenue’s appeal is rejected.

Comment:-The substance of this case is that a C & F Agent principally stores and clears goods on the directions of the principal and does not has the liberty to sell goods to customers of his choice.

 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com