Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2011-12/1204

Credit taken on service tax paid on Supply of JCB used for cleaning, leveling etc of waste yard, transplanting of old trees etc. – admissibility of

CASE: - COMMISIONER OF C.EX. SALEM VS ITC LTD

CITATION: -2011(268) E.L.T. 89(TRI.-CHENNAI)

ISSUE: -Credit taken on service tax paid on Supply of JCB used for cleaning, leveling etc of waste yard, transplanting of old trees etc. – admissibility of

BREIF FACT: -Respondent are manufacturer of paper and paper board. They have taken credit of the service tax paid on various services like-Supply of JCB for yard, cleaning and internal road leveling, plastic removal and cleaning of yard, transplantation of old trees and levelling work, JCB chain dozer tractor for waste yard levelling work, JCB tractor & manpower supply for swimming pool cleaning work, plastic removal and cleaning of yard, trench work, supply of tractors, JCB for yard development works, draining works, drain cleaning work, waste yard work, waste yard filling and levelling work, supply of chain dozer for waste yard.

Department issued Show cause notice to the respondent denying credit of service tax so taken.  The Original authority denied credit in respect of service tax paid on the above activities. On appeal the Commissioner (Appeal) set aside the order of the original authority.
Hence, Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal.

APPEALLANT CONTENTION: -Revenue submitted that the above activities are not directly related to manufacture and clearance of final product and the same cannot be also considered to be activities relating to setting up, modernization, renovation and repair of the factory or activities relating to their business as covered by the inclusive definition. Therefore, the order of the Commissioner (Appeal) is required to be set aside and the order of original authority is to be restored.

RESPONDENT CONTENTION: -Respondent submitted that waste paper is one of the main raw material used by them and waste paper yard is a leased area, use of JCB for levelling/filling and cleaning of yard is essential activities, which is integrally connected to receipt and storage and process of raw material Activities like transplantation of the old trees are in connection with expansion of the factory. Most of the activities  are directly related to the handling of the raw material  and rest of the activities are business activities used within the factory premises  in connection with the maintaining cleanliness and approach to different part of the factory and to ensure proper communication. Therefore, the credit was validly taken by them.

REASONING OF JUDGEMENT: - The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeal) had appreciated the fact that the respondent who is manufacture of paper and paper board are handling huge quantity of waste paper and the activities for the upkeep of waste yard, which include laying down roads, levelling, filling up etc are part and parcel of activities having relation to manufacture of excisable activities. It was noted that the Commissioner also took note of the fact that the activities like transplantation of the old trees were in connection with the expansion of factory. Similarly, the Commissioner held that the draining and maintenance of drain and swimming pools are related to the maintenance of effluent plants. In the light of the factual finding, he treated the activities as input service and allowed the credit.

It was held that the department had not adduced any evidence to contradict the factual findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) on the nature of activities and the purpose for which the same were undertaken. The impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeal) required no interference.

JUDGEMENT: -Appeal rejected.
 
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com