Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2011-12/1544

Classification of service as Works Contract service - issue highly debatable 0 stay granted in similar case - stay granted herein

Case: IVRCL-NAVAYUGA-SEW (JOINT VENTURE) Versus COMMR. OF C. EX., HYDERABAD
 
Citation: - 2012 (25) S.T.R. 236 (Tri.- Bang.)
 
Issue:- Joint venture with State Government of AP – whether works contract service when there was no transfer of property in the goods consumed in the execution of work from the Assessee – matter highly debatable – stay granted and pre-deposit waived as similar pending cases stay was granted.
 
Brief Facts:- Applicants are a joint venture of two or three companies and registered as partnership firm. The work awarded by the government were related to irrigation project and included project investigation, soil exploration, design, supply, installation, testing & commissioning of machinery, construction  of pump house, all civil structure, CM & CD works, etc. The contract awarded by the government to each of the appellants was sub-contracted to one or the other constituent of the partnership of the same joint venture and the latter undertook the works. The Applicants did not pay Service tax.
 
Demands of Service Tax under the head ‘work contract service’ which is taxable w.e.f 1-6-2007 were raised against the Applicants on the amount collected by them from the Government of Andhra Pradesh for execution of certain works awarded by the government under agreement entered between the appellant and the Government.
 
In some cases, the show-cause notices invoked the extended period of limitation for recovery of Service tax for the extended period. These notices also demanded interest on tax apart from proposing penalties under various provision of Finance Act, 1994.
 
In separate orders, the demands were confirmed against the Applicants and penalties were imposed on them.
 
Applicants are therefore in appeal before the Tribunal. Application have been filed seeking waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of various amount of Service tax and penalties determined by the Commissioner in adjudication of various show cause notices for period June, 2007 to September,2008.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
Appellant’s Contentions:- Applicants contended that work in question in each case is public welfare/utility project and hence excluded from the levy of Service tax under the head ‘works contract service’. The second contention of the Applicants is that the work would not constitute works contract in as much as there was no transfer of property in the goods consumed in the execution of work from the Appellant to Government of Andhra Pradesh.
 
In this connections Applicants has heavily relied on Supreme Court’s judgment in State of Andhra Pradesh v. Larsen & Turbo Ltd. [2008-TIOL-158-SC-VAT] wherein the Court had examined the legal position with regards to transfer of property in the goods consumed in execution of the work undertaken by the contractor through the sub contractor. It was held that the property of such good should be considered to have been transferred directly from the sub-contractor to the client. In other words, there was a deemed sale by the sub-contractor to the client. On the strength of this decision of the Supreme Court, Applicants has contended that, in the instant case, it cannot be said that there is transfer of property in the good consumed in the execution of work, from the JVs firm to the Government of Andhra Pradesh.
 
Applicants argued that without passage of property from the JVs to Government, the former cannot be held to be providers of ‘work contract service’. They also referred to some of the specimen work orders in his endeavor to show that the works undertaken as per these order did not constitute works contract for purpose of Section 65(105) (zzzza). Applicants has also claimed support from the Board Circular No. 123/5/2010-TRU, dated 24-5-2010 wherein the definition of ‘work contract’ was clarified. It is argued that, two or more activities should be comprised in works contract, they should severally also be shown to be taxable services. On this test also, according to Applicants, the activity undertaken by the JVs through their sub-contractors would not qualify to be ‘work contract service’.
 
They has also prayed for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in view of certain Stay orders passed by this Tribunal in similar cases viz. Ramkay Infrastructure ltd. V C.C.E. -2010 (20) S.T.R. 123, Ramkay Infrastructure v. C.C.E.-2011 (22) S.T.R. 85 and Nagarjuna Construction Co. v. C.C.E- 2011(22) S.T.R. 433. It is submitted that on similar set of facts, waiver and stay were granted in those cases.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:- The Tribunal was of the view that the issues raised in this case are highly debatable and that, for the present purpose, the precedent cited by the Counsel can be followed. The Tribunal perused the stay orders cited by applicants and have found that waiver and stay were granted on similar fact in favour of those parties.
 
Prima-facie, the Board’s clarification work’s in favour of the appellant. In this view of the matter, waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery are allowed in respect of the amounts adjudged against the appellants.
 
Decision:- Stay granted and pre-deposit waived.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com