Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2020-2021/3582

Classification of ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ manufactured by the applicant and Rate of GST
M/s. LVP Foods Private Limited 2020(32) G.S.T.L. 612 (AAR-GST-UP) dated 06.09.2019
 
Brief Facts:-The applicant is a limited company engaged in the processing and packing of milk in pouches. The applicant propose to manufacture and supply a new product - ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ which would be used like any milk powder used in hotels, restaurants, etc. as well as households for making instant tea and coffee and known as “milk powder” in common trade parlance. As per applicant, the main constituent of ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ would be standard liquid milk which would undergone various process like filtration, separation, pasteurization, evaporation, homogenization etc. to obtain ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ in powdered form, which would then be packed in unit container/sachets.
 
Issue: -Classification of ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ manufactured by the applicant and Rate of GST
 
Appellant’s Contention:-The applicant has further submitted that, as per their view, the aforementioned product could be most appropriately classifiable under Chapter Heading 0402. The HSN Code “0402” covers milk concentrated and containing added sugar or other sweetening matter whether liquid, solid or paste.
The applicant also submit that as per Rule 2b of The General Rules for interpretation of the first schedule (Import Tariff), any reference in a heading to a material/substance shall be taken to include a reference to mixtures or combinations of that material or substance with other materials or substances. In the Applicant’s case, the Chapter Heading 0402 covers milk and even in the addition of other material in small quantities it remains to be milk powder classifiable under Chapter Heading 0402.
The Applicant further submits that as per Rule 3a of the said Rules of interpretation, the heading which provides the most specific description shall be preferred to heading having more general description. According to Rule 3b of the Rules of Interpretation, in case Rule 3a is not applicable, the goods shall be classified as if they consisted of the material/raw material which gives their essential character. In the applicant’s case, the essential character to ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ is given by liquid milk. The said product cannot be manufactured without milk. All other ingredients are ancillary in nature.
Moreover, the applicant also provided RSS of T-Rich” manufactured by M/s. Goodrich Carbohyderate Ltd., Karnal, Haryana and submitted that their product along with ingredients will be similar in nature. Later on, they also provided a copy of Invoice for T-Rich Milk Mix, issued by M/s. Lokenath Enterprises, Changrabandha, West Bengal, wherein the classification of said product was made under Chapter Heading 0402.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:-The Authority observed that the product in question i.e., ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ is a product made out of standard liquid milk which undergoes various processes and added with some other additives. Even after addition of other additives, it remains to be milk powder and in common parlance, it would be known as ‘Instant Tea Whitener/milk powder’. They further observed that as per the Rule 3a of the Rules of Interpretation, the heading which provides the most specific description shall be preferred to heading having more general description and according to Rule 3b of the Rules of Interpretations, “Mixtures, composite goods consisting of different material or made up of different components, and goods put up in sets for retail sale, which cannot be classified by reference to (a), shall be classified as if they consisted of the material or component which gives them their essential character, in so far as this criterion is applicable”.
In the instant case the authority observed that the main ingredient/essential character of the product in question is given by liquid milk. They are in unison with the contention of the applicant that the said product cannot be manufactured without milk and all other ingredients are ancillary in nature.
 
Ruling:-  The product ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ as described in the application will merit classification under Chapter Heading  0402 of the GST Tariff and would be chargeable to GST at applicable rate under the said tariff entry, presently read with Notification No. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 (Sl. No. 08 of Schedule-I).
 
Comment:-  In Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd. (GST AAR Karnataka) ruling, AAR ruled that The “flavoured milk” is not a water based drink whereas the tariff heading 2202 deals with water based beverages and other non alcoholic beverages. Therefore it could be inferred that the pre-dominant part of the beverages covered under the heading 2202 is water. In the instant case the pre­dominant constituent is milk and hence the “flavored milk” does not merit classification under beverage containing milk, under tariff heading 2202 9930, but merits classification as milk, under tariff heading 0402.
Moreover, they relied on the decision of Gujarat Coop. Milk Marketing Federation Ltd Vs State of UP vide 2017(5)0STL 351(All) dated 31.05.2017 wherein it has decided that flavoured Milk is a form of Milk. The Court has also specifically observed that flavoured milk is a form of milk as it is neither a derivative of milk nor a milk product.
Prepared By- Bharat Rathore
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com