Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2020-2021/3582

Classification of ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ manufactured by the applicant and Rate of GST
M/s. LVP Foods Private Limited 2020(32) G.S.T.L. 612 (AAR-GST-UP) dated 06.09.2019
 
Brief Facts:-The applicant is a limited company engaged in the processing and packing of milk in pouches. The applicant propose to manufacture and supply a new product - ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ which would be used like any milk powder used in hotels, restaurants, etc. as well as households for making instant tea and coffee and known as “milk powder” in common trade parlance. As per applicant, the main constituent of ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ would be standard liquid milk which would undergone various process like filtration, separation, pasteurization, evaporation, homogenization etc. to obtain ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ in powdered form, which would then be packed in unit container/sachets.
 
Issue: -Classification of ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ manufactured by the applicant and Rate of GST
 
Appellant’s Contention:-The applicant has further submitted that, as per their view, the aforementioned product could be most appropriately classifiable under Chapter Heading 0402. The HSN Code “0402” covers milk concentrated and containing added sugar or other sweetening matter whether liquid, solid or paste.
The applicant also submit that as per Rule 2b of The General Rules for interpretation of the first schedule (Import Tariff), any reference in a heading to a material/substance shall be taken to include a reference to mixtures or combinations of that material or substance with other materials or substances. In the Applicant’s case, the Chapter Heading 0402 covers milk and even in the addition of other material in small quantities it remains to be milk powder classifiable under Chapter Heading 0402.
The Applicant further submits that as per Rule 3a of the said Rules of interpretation, the heading which provides the most specific description shall be preferred to heading having more general description. According to Rule 3b of the Rules of Interpretation, in case Rule 3a is not applicable, the goods shall be classified as if they consisted of the material/raw material which gives their essential character. In the applicant’s case, the essential character to ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ is given by liquid milk. The said product cannot be manufactured without milk. All other ingredients are ancillary in nature.
Moreover, the applicant also provided RSS of T-Rich” manufactured by M/s. Goodrich Carbohyderate Ltd., Karnal, Haryana and submitted that their product along with ingredients will be similar in nature. Later on, they also provided a copy of Invoice for T-Rich Milk Mix, issued by M/s. Lokenath Enterprises, Changrabandha, West Bengal, wherein the classification of said product was made under Chapter Heading 0402.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:-The Authority observed that the product in question i.e., ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ is a product made out of standard liquid milk which undergoes various processes and added with some other additives. Even after addition of other additives, it remains to be milk powder and in common parlance, it would be known as ‘Instant Tea Whitener/milk powder’. They further observed that as per the Rule 3a of the Rules of Interpretation, the heading which provides the most specific description shall be preferred to heading having more general description and according to Rule 3b of the Rules of Interpretations, “Mixtures, composite goods consisting of different material or made up of different components, and goods put up in sets for retail sale, which cannot be classified by reference to (a), shall be classified as if they consisted of the material or component which gives them their essential character, in so far as this criterion is applicable”.
In the instant case the authority observed that the main ingredient/essential character of the product in question is given by liquid milk. They are in unison with the contention of the applicant that the said product cannot be manufactured without milk and all other ingredients are ancillary in nature.
 
Ruling:-  The product ‘Instant Tea Whitener’ as described in the application will merit classification under Chapter Heading  0402 of the GST Tariff and would be chargeable to GST at applicable rate under the said tariff entry, presently read with Notification No. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017 (Sl. No. 08 of Schedule-I).
 
Comment:-  In Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd. (GST AAR Karnataka) ruling, AAR ruled that The “flavoured milk” is not a water based drink whereas the tariff heading 2202 deals with water based beverages and other non alcoholic beverages. Therefore it could be inferred that the pre-dominant part of the beverages covered under the heading 2202 is water. In the instant case the pre­dominant constituent is milk and hence the “flavored milk” does not merit classification under beverage containing milk, under tariff heading 2202 9930, but merits classification as milk, under tariff heading 0402.
Moreover, they relied on the decision of Gujarat Coop. Milk Marketing Federation Ltd Vs State of UP vide 2017(5)0STL 351(All) dated 31.05.2017 wherein it has decided that flavoured Milk is a form of Milk. The Court has also specifically observed that flavoured milk is a form of milk as it is neither a derivative of milk nor a milk product.
Prepared By- Bharat Rathore
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com