Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2012-13/1032

Cenvat Credit on Cell Towers, Prefabricated building, printer etc used in providing Sellular Telephone services - admissibility of

Case: M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. V/S COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE
 
Citation: 2012 –TIOL-209-CESTAT-MUM
 
Issue:- Whether cenvat credit on Cell Towers, prefabricated building, printer, office chair used in providing cellular telephone services is admissible?
 
Brief Facts:- The appellant is engaged in the business of providing cellular telephone service taxable under section 65 of the Finance Act, (Act No. 32 of 1994). For paying service tax on this output service, they can utilise cenvat credit of the duty paid on capital goods and inputs and of the service tax paid on input services provided such “capital goods” , “inputs” and “ input services” would fall within the ambit of the respective definitions under Rule 2 of the CENVAT Credit Rules , 2004. Four show-cause notices were issued by the department mainly to deny cenvat credit to the appellant on certain items which were claimed, by the latter, to have been used for providing their output service.
 
Appellant’s Contention:- The contention made by the appellant was regarding availment of cenvat credit on CELL SITES, TOWERS, PREFABRICATED BUILDING, PRINTER, OFFICE CHAIRS.
 
The appeal made is that a CELL SITE comprising GSM and MW antennas supported by the tower and BTS and other equipments housed in the PFB is an integrated system loosely known as BTS and classifiable under heading 85.25 of the CETA Schedule. It is submitted that the tower and parts thereof are parts of the integrated system and hence eligible capital goods . In both the appeals the appellant has claimed support in the above context from the following decisions:-
 
(i) INDIAN COPPER CORPORATION LTD. VS. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES . [ 1965 (16) STC 259 (SC) ]
 
(ii) J.K.COTTON SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS CO.LTD. VS. STO [1997 (91( ELT 34 (S.C)]
 
(iii) JAWAHAR MILLS LTD. VS. CCE [1999 (108) ELT 47 (TRI-LB)]
 
(iv) INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY MANUFACTURERS PVT.LTD. VS. STATE OF GUJARAT.[1965 (16) STC 380 (GUJ)]
 
In respect of PFB, the appellant points out that CCE, Meerut-I vide Order-in-Original no. 4-5/commissioner/MRT-I/07 held that , as a part of BTS which was eligible capital goods , PFB was essential in providing output service and therefore the duty paid thereon would be available as credit to the telecom operator.
 
Alternatively, the appellant has contended that the tower and parts thereof and the PFB would also quantify as ‘inputs’ used for providing output service. It is based on sub-clause (ii) of clause (k) of Rule 2 (definition of “input”) of the cenvat Credit Rules. The relying decisions are:
 
(i) CCE VS. MODI RUBBER LTD. [2000 (119) ELT (TRI-LB)]
 
(ii) CCE VS.ZENITH PAPERS [2002 (146) ELT 518(P&H)]
 
Office chairs have been claimed to be ‘inputs’ as, in the appellant’s view, these were indirectly used , if not directly, for providing the output service. In this connection, the following decisions have been relied on:
 
(i) COMMISSIONER VS.HOTEL LEELA VENTURE LTD.[2003(158) ELT 777(TRI-MUM)]
 
(ii) ORACLE INDIA P. LTD. VS. CC [2006 (200) ELT 545 (TRI-BANG)]
 
(iii) CC VS. ADITI TECHNOLIGIES (P) LTD. [2003 (151) ELT 343 (TRI)]
 
(iv) DSL SOFTWARE VS. CC [2005 (181) ELT 250 (TRI-BANG)]
 
(v) AZTEC SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LTD. VS. CC [2005 (189) ELT 301 (TRI-BANG)]
 
Printers which are classifiable under Chapter 84 of the CETA Schedule and are used for printing bills for subscribers have also been claimed to be ‘capital goods’.
 
The penalties have been challenged on the ground that the appellant did not have any intention to evade payment of duty and that no penalty was liable to be imposed in a case like this involving a question   of law on which divergent views could be taken as in the impugned  order and in order-in-original no. 04-05 dated 31.01.2007 of CCE, Meerut-I. The penalty imposed under Rule 15(2) of the Cenvat credit  Rules has been challenged on the further ground that the same cannot be imposed on a service provider like the appellant who is not a manufacturer.
 
The written submissions dt.16.06.2011 filed on behalf of the appellant  relied on excerpts from certain technical books/articles such as the following:-
 
(i) DIGITAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS by DAVID R.SMITH
 
(ii) THE DVB-H HANDBOOK, THE FUNCTIONING PLANNING OF MOBILE TV by JYRKI T.J.PENTTINEN,PETRA JOLMA, ERKKI AALTONEN,JANI VORE.
 
(iii) WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS by WILLIAM STALLINGS
 
(iv) CELL PHONE TOWERS AS VISUAL POLLUTION, an essay by JOHN COPELAND NAGLE
 
Respondent’s Contention:- The learned JCDR made the following submissions:-
 
1) The towers were assembled at site and ,upon assembly, they become immovable property .Any immovable property was not covered  by the definition of  ‘capital goods’ and therefore  the erected towers could not be considered as capital goods falling under clause (i) of Rule 2(a)(A)
Of the cenvat credit rules, 2004. In this connection , the tribunal’s larger bench decision in VANDANA GLOBAL case was relied on.
 
2)PFBs are classifiable under heading 9406 in chapter 94 of the CETA Schedule and this chapter is not specified in clause(i) of Rule 2(a)(A) which defines ‘capital goods’. Therefore components / parts of such PFBs would also not be considered as capital goods under clause (iii) of the said rule. PFB and its parts cannot be considered as inputs either, as the connection between these items and the output service is too remote.
 
3) Chairs and printers being office equipments/appliances have been excluded from the ambit of the definition of ‘capital goods’. Chairs, classifiable under Chapter 94 which is not specified in the definition of capital goods, cannot, in any case, be treated as capital goods. Chairs and printers cannot also be considered as inputs as they cannot be said to have been used for providing the output service.
 
The learned JCDR also referred to the case law cited by the learned Counsel and sought to distinguish the cited cases:
 
(i) RAJASTHAN SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS
(ii) ISPAT INDUSTRIES
(iii)LLOYDS METALS & ENGINEERING LTD.
(iv) HUTCHISON MAX TELECOM PVT. LTD.
(v) VAM ORGANIC CHEMICALS LTD,
(vi) MUNDRA PORT & SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES LTD.V/S.CCE, RAJKOT
 
Reasoning of Judgment:- It is ordered as under:-
 
1)The subject items are neither ‘capital goods’ under Rule 2(a) nor  ‘inputs’  under Rule 2(k) of the cenvat credit rules, 2004 and hence cenvat credit of the duty paid thereon  is not admissible to the appellant for the relevant period;
 
2)The cenvat credit taken on the said items and utilised by the appellant is recoverable  subject to limitation
 
3)The limitation issue is remanded to the Commissioner for careful consideration and decision;
 
4) The question whether, on the facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is liable to be penalised under Rule 15 of the cenvat credit rules,2004 and , if so, to what extent is also remanded to the commissioner for fresh consideration and decision;
 
5)The appellant shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being head on the remanded issues.
 
Decision:- Both the appeals are disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com