Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2789

Category of service under which laying of pipeline falls.

Case:-COMMISSIONER OF S.T., MUMBAI VS HYUNDAI HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO. LTD.

Citation:-2014 (33) S.T.R. 111 (Tri. - Mumbai)

Brief Facts:-This is Revenue’s appeal against Order-in-Original No. 09/STC/SJS/2006, dated 23-11-2006 passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai.
The respondent, Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., Mumbai entered into an agreement with M/s. ONGC dated 17-3-2003 for laying of submarine pipelines, for the transport of petroleum crude oil from Bombay High and Bassein Field Offshore sites. The scope of the work as per the agreement was as follows :
“Whereas, the company is desirous of carrying out work of laying of submarine pipelines and Topside modification works of Mumbai High and Bassein Pipeline Project (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Work’ or ‘Works’ and more particularly defined in the Clause 1.1.35 of the General Condition of the Contract) on turnkey basis at its Mumbai High and Bassein Field Offshore Sites, the work covered under the contract to include but not limited to surveys (pre-engineer, pre-construction/pre-installation and post-installation), design, engineering, procurement, fabrication, anti-corrosion and weight removal and disposal of unutilized riser clamps and existing risers along with some portion of submarine pipelines which is required to be removed for aligning the new pipeline with new riser, transportation, installation, hook-up, testing and pre-commissioning, commissioning assistance and supply of 10 No. each of coated pipes (anode fitted) of sizes 8” and 10”.”
The department was of the view that the said activity undertaken by the respondent is exigible to Service Tax under the category of ‘Commissioning and Installation Service’ and accordingly issued a notice dated 1-10-2006 demanding Service Tax of Rs. 3,36,33,940/- for the period 1-7-2003 to 31-3-2004. The notice was adjudicated and the Commissioner held that laying of pipeline, as part of the turnkey projects, would not come under the category of ‘Commissioning and Installation Service’ and might be classifiable under ‘Commercial Construction Service’ which came into force w.e.f. 16-6-2005. He also noted that though ‘Construction Service’ came under the tax net w.e.f. 10-9-2004, the said service also would not include within its scope laying of long distance pipeline. In other words, the Commissioner held that during the impugned period laying of pipeline was not a taxable activity. Accordingly, he dropped the demand.
Revenue is aggrieved of the same and is in appeal before the Tribunal.

Appellant contentions:-  It is argued on behalf of the Revenue that the respondent actually provided a bundle of services including ‘Commissioning and Installation Service’ and the laying of pipeline would be covered under ‘Commissioning and Installation of Plant, Machinery or Equipment’ which came under the tax net w.e.f 10-9-2004 and therefore, dropping of the demand by the Commissioner is not sustainable in law. The learned Commissioner (AR) appearing for the Revenue reiterates these grounds.

Respondent contention:-None appeared for the respondent, Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:-We have carefully considered the rival submissions.
During the period of demand Section 65(39A) of the Finance Act, 1994 provided that :
“(39A)‘Commissioning or Installation’ means any service provided by a commissioning and installation agency, in relation to commissioning or installation of plant, machinery or equipment.”
Therefore, the activity covered under the tax net is only ‘commissioning or installation of plant, machinery or equipment’. This Tribunal in the case of Indian Hume Pipes Co. Ltd. - 2008 (12) S.T.R. 363 held that pipes or pipeline does not come under the category of ‘plant, machinery or equipment’ and, therefore laying of pipeline does not come within the scope of ‘Commissioning or Installation Service’. In any case, laying of pipelines has been specifically covered under ‘Commercial Construction Service’ which came into effect from 16-6-2005. During the impugned period, the activity of laying of pipeline was not covered under the ‘Commissioning and Installation Service’. Therefore, we do not find any infirmity in the Commissioner’s order dropping the demand.
In view of the above, we do not find any merit in the Revenue’s appeal and the same is dismissed. Consequently the respondent would be eligible for relief, if any, in accordance with law.

Decision:-Appeal dismissed.

Comment:-The essence of this case is that when the activity of laying pipelines was specifically included under ‘Commercial or Industrial Construction Service’ w.e.f. 16.6.2005, it cannot be classified under ‘Commissioning and Installation Service’ prior to 16.06.2005. Consequently, the appeal was allowed by concluding that laying of pipelines was not leviable to service tax prior to 16.06.2005.

Prepared By: Meet Jain

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com