Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   RTI applicant in Madhya Pradesh asked to pay GST for information *   India’s GST collection drops to Rs93,960cr in August *   Karnataka Taxmen arrest two Bengaluru businessmen in GST related fraud *  Govt may soon impose IGST on ex-factory sales; decision in September. *  Niti Aayog Suggests Slashing Import Duty, GST On Gold *  Kerala Floods: Relief Goods Exempted From Customs Duty, IGST *  No GST On Petrol, Diesel In Near Future As Centre, States Not In Favour. *  Kerala plans to raise Rs 7.5 bn through hiked liquor duty & 10% cess on GST. *  Orissa HC directs authorities not to take action against importers on GST. *  Firms can't be selective in passing on rate cut benefits under GST regime *  Technical glitches continue to haunt the Goods and Services Tax Network *  GST Annual Return: Everything you need to know about the format, eligibility & rules around GSTR 9  *  Post GST, J&K’s own tax collection drops by Rs 1,300 crore since July 2017 *  GST Council may replace 12% and 18% slabs with 14-15% one: Sushil Modi *  Domino’s lands in trouble for not passing on GST cuts *   Higher oil prices, GST may boost states revenue by Rs 37,400 crore in FY19  *   These taxpayers no more at mercy of GST intermediaries *  Budget 2018: No fiscal derailment, but a lot rides on GST; expect caution from RBI *  GST: E-way bill implementation deferred due to glitches *  Homebuyers must avoid traps on the name of NO GST Impact *   Govt will formulate a comprehensive gold policy to develop gold as an asset class *   Government to evolve to asign a unique id to every individual enterprise. *   1.48 lakh crore for rail budget. *   7148 Crore to be sanctioned to textile sector. *   3700 corore for SME industry *  16000 crore for free electricity connection *   Government ignored warnings over GST rollout: sources *  GSTR 3B questionaire introduced- To be filled before filing return *  Advisory mail  to all the taxpayers received from GSTN *   Advisory group on GST submits report, suggests changes
Subject News *  Consumer durables firms, GST body continue to spar over profiteering *   225 million e-way bills generated across India since GST rollout *   September last month to fix GST filing errors *   Due date of TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 is extended *   Extension of Due date for GSTR-3B only for newly migrated taxpayers *   Extension of Due date for GSTR-1 *   Taxpayer with turnover over Rs 2 cr need GST audit certificate, will be arduous job for auditors *   Whether the appellants are eligible for refund of the duty claimed to have been paid in excess on the basis of DMT of the goods? Whether the said claim of refund is sustainable without challenging the assessment of the shipping bills. (Source:PJ/CASE LAW/2018-2019/3479) *   GST Flash Updates on various circulars and notifications dated 04/09/2018 *   GST Update on Circular No. 61/2018-GST dated 04.09.2018 *   GST Update on disharmony in CGST and SGST *    Update on restriction of refund of IGST paid on exports under Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules *   1,800 businesses migrate to GST regime *   ‘Missing’ service tax credit in GST update worries companies  *   Government notifies new annual return form for GST *  Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff. *  : Whether processing of secondary raw materials(steel scrap of different and variable composition) into blended steel scrap is liable for payment of central excise duty under the provision of the central excise Act,1944?Can  such “blended metal scrap” can be classified under tariff item 72044900 of the central excise tariff Act, 1985? *  Whether the transportation of goods by means of hired vehicles such that no consignment note is issued, would fall under the category of Goods Transport Agency Service? *  Whether the applicant is eligible to avail the benefit of exemption from payment of SAD provided under Notification No. 21/2012-Cus. *  Whether the polyester sewing thread manufactured by the appellant is excisable or not. *  INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIAMOND GRADING & RESEARCH INDIA P. LTD. *  Whether grading and inscription of diamonds by the appellant (IIDGR India Private Limited) would amount to manufacture under Central Excise legislation. *  What is the classification when frozen meat is sold in packaged form and rate of tax to be applicable? *  Is the unutilized cenvat credit available before surrender of registration transferable to the new unit? *  Whether Kindle device is covered under Tariff Item 8543 70 99 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or not? *  GST Council considering Kerala government's proposal of 'calamity tax' *  Orissa HC directs authorities not to take action against importers on GST *  Whether the assessee on filing of second appeal before Tribunal is required to make an additional pre-deposit of 10% of the duty and penalty in dispute? *  Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff? *  Niti Aayog Suggests Slashing Import Duty, GST On Gold  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-17/3444

Can service tax credit be disallowed if bills were hand written or that service provider had not remitted the amount collected to the account of Central Government?

 Case:-  PARKER MARKWELL INDUS. LTD. Versus  C.C., C. E. & S.T., HYDERABAD-I

Citation:- 2017 (48) S.T.R. 59 (Tri. - Hyd.)

Brief Facts:-   The appeal was filed challenging the disallowance of credit of service tax paid on inputs services on the following ground :
i.          That the invoices were hand written bills and that they do not contain all the details as required under Rule 4(A) of Service Tax Rules, 1994.
ii.          That the service provider, Shri C. Suresh did not remit the service tax collected from the appellant to the Central Government.
On perusal of the impugned order, it was seen that the Original Authority after analyzing the defect of the invoices to be hand written bills had allowed credit of Rs. 33,33,870/- on the ground that the Service provider Shri C. Suresh, had remitted the said amount to Central Government. An amount of Rs. 9,73,038/- had been denied vaguely stating that the invoices do not contain necessary particulars. The Commissioner (Appeals) had upheld the disallowance of Rs. 9,73,038/- stating that there was no evidence of payment produced by the appellant.

Appellant’s Contention:-  Ld. Counsel Shri M. Karthikeyan submitted that in the show cause notice the department had not alleged as to what was the deficiency in the hand written bills, apart from the fact that these bills were hand written bills. He also argued that credit could not be disallowed for the reason that the bills were hand written or that service provider had not remitted the amount collected to the account of Central Government.

Respondent’s Contention:- The ld. AR Sri Nagaraj Naik strongly defended the findings in the impugned order. He argued that the adjudicating authority had allowed an amount of Rs. 33,33,870/- on being satisfied that the service provider Sri C. Suresh had paid the amount in the account of the Central Government. He also argued that the hand written bills did not contain the essential details. Therefore, the disallowance was legal and proper.

Reasoning of Judgment:- It was seen from records that the service provider Shri C. Suresh had paid Rs. 33,33,870/- to Central Government and credit of this amount had been allowed by both authorities below even though the invoices were hand written. The show cause notice did not allege what were the discrepancies in the invoices. Therefore, it was evident that the only reason for which the credit of Rs. 9,73,038/- had been disallowed was that the service provider Sri C. Suresh had not paid the said amount collected to the account of revenue. This definitely could not be a ground to deny the credit to the appellant who had paid service tax and produced the invoices/hand written bills. Though it was stated in the impugned order that the hand written bills do not contain essential details, it was not stated as to what were the essential details in terms of Rule 4(A) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 that was required to make the invoices in order.
 
 
Appeal allowed.

Comment:The gist of the case was that service tax credit cannot be disallowed on the basis that the bills are hand written if such bills contain all the essential details in terms of Rule 4(A) of Service Tax Rules, 1994.
Also, service tax credit cannot be denied on the grounds that the service provider has not paid the amount so collected to the account of revenue to the receiver of service who has paid service tax and produced the invoices/hand written bills.

Prepared by- Alakh Bhandari
 
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com