Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   Non-Tariff Charges Except Cheque Dishonour Fee is exempted from GST: AAAR *   GST: Rs 50,000 crore tax shortfall upsets budget maths *   Arun Jaitley favours GST council-like structure for healthcare, agriculture   *   Traders are not Annoyed with GST, CAIT Writes to Rahul Gandhi   *   March GST collection may touch Rs 1 lakh crore *   For biscuit companies, this is how the cookie crumbles post GST *   No arrest can be made without following procedures in GST evasion cases: HC *   White goods firms under NAA lens for pocketing GST rate cuts   *   Cos can raise product weight in lieu of price cut to pass on GST benefit   *   GST could have been implemented after trial run: Singhvi   *   DRI detects Rs 3.25 cr tax evasion in sale of complimentary IPL tickets   *   Jaitley: Consensus is the secret behind GST’s success   *   Starbucks may face fine for ‘profiteering’ after GST rate cut *   Simpler GST turns out to be bad business for India’s tax consultants   *  Cloudtail India fined Rs 11 lakh by GST anti-profiteering authority *  GSTN Alert: Two New Features added in the Portal *   GST: TVS Motor joins Hero MotoCorp to seek reduction in rate on two-wheelers *   SPARC gets GST notice for ₹46.04 crore *   GST on service sector: Vague orders by advance ruling authorities spell trouble *   Jubilant FoodWorks slapped with Rs 41.42 crore Demand by GST Anti-Profiteering Authority *   Kerala High Court dismisses 3,250 Petitions challenging VAT Assessments post GST *  Rs 230-crore GST scam by Tamil Nadu steel traders unearthed *  Telcos seek GST waiver on payments to govt, Rs 35K-cr input credit adjustment *  Domino's Pizza fined for not passing GST rate cut benefits to customers   *  Patanjali dealer fined for not passing on GST rate cut to consumers *  Foxconn awaiting Rs 1,000 crore GST refund *   Hyderabad: Probe reveals shell firms floated only for GST fraud *  Firm evades Rs 1.27-crore GST; proprietor booked *   Tax Rate on Fly Ash Bricks:- Condition of 90% or more fly ash content *  Ahmedabad CGST officials bust fake GST invoice racket worth Rs 175 crore
Subject News *   Discounts granted must be deducted from Invoice Value to avail Input Tax Credit: AAR *   Lodging along with Food to Students by a Private Boarding House is a Composite Supply, 18% GST applicable: AAR *   Gold Schemes Offered to Customers not eligible for GST Input Tax Credit: AAR  *   GSTN adds New Feature in Portal *   GST: Solar heater parts taxed at 18% *   GST Council's plan for real estate sector may not find many takers   *   Relief to exporters; govt extends IGST, compensation cess exemption for various export plans   *   Consumer Goods Makers Won’t Be Taxed On Buy-One-Get-One-Free Offers *   GST: Unused ITC for half-built houses to be reversed *   GST tribunal proposed at Allahabad, regional benches in 19 districts: Govt   *   GST officials detect tax fraud of Rs 224 cr by 8 companies *   GST appellate body clears air on tax credit for sweet shop vs restaurant *   GST Council to meet on March 19 to finalise real estate tax structure *  Government has said : GST does not apply on the TCS amount *  Solar power generation 5.8 per cent costlier with GST: Report  *  The Federation of Automobile Dealers Associations Seeking Rollback Of GST Amendments *  Government notified April 1 Date Set For Availing Increased GST Exemption Limit, Composition Scheme *  New GST return forms released; compliance process simplified from April 1 *  Realtors seek clarity on GST exemption on development rights *  Govt issues order on ‘removal of difficulties’ in GST *  GST collections drop to Rs 97,247 cr in Feb; rate cuts may have hit mop-up *  There are dark clouds on the horizon when it comes to GST *  GST: DGGI seizes record of Yarn Firms in Ludhiana *  GST Evasion worth Rs 650 crore unearthed in Maharashtra *  GST: Delhi Govt targets Rs 29,000 crore Revenue for Next Year *  Breaking shackles: How GST ended the era of captive warehousing *  Transparency and simplicity in the tax regime are casualties of the GST Council’s recent decisions. *  Reduction in GST rate leads to a drop in price? Real estate a test case for broader changes *  With GST rate cut, you have another reason to buy a house *  GST Commissionerate Hails Mahesh Babu  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-2017/3445

can seized goods be released after payment of duty and penalty?

Case-SANDEEP GUPTA versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
Citation-2017(345) E.L.T.79 (ALL.)
Issue-can seized goods be released after payment of duty and penalty?
Brief Facts- The facts of the present case are that the petitioner is the proprietor of the firms M/s. Sandeep Manufacturing Strips (a manufacturing unit) and M/s. Sandeep Metal Supply (a trading company). The manufacturing unit was situated at Loni, Ghaziabad whereas the trading unit was situated at Chawri Bazar, Delhi. The two units of which the petitioner was the proprietor were engaged in manufacturing and trading respectively of copper items falling under Chapter Heading 74 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. A search was conducted in the premises of M/s. Sandeep Manufacturing Strips, Loni, Ghaziabad and the goods were seized/detained vide Panchanama order dated 27-10-2010. The business premises of M/s. Sandeep Metal Supply was also searched and the goods were seized/detained vide Panchanama of even date.The contention of the petitioner was that there was no illegality in the business activities of the petitioner and, therefore, the search and detention affected on 27-7-2010 was illegal. The detention order was liable to be lifted.
It appeared that a show cause notice was issued by the Directorate General Central Excise Intelligence, New Delhi on 25-1-2011 calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why the items of copper seized from the premises of M/s. Sandeep Metal Supply weighing 5317.11 Kgs. and valued at Rs. 1,91,43,040/- be not confiscated under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and further 4522 Kgs. of Copper ingots, 4413 Kgs. of copper strips seized from the factory premises of M/s. Sandeep Metal Strips, Loni, Ghaziabad be also not confiscated under the aforesaid Rules. A sum of Rs. 22,42,584/- towards Central Excise duty and Rs. 44,852/- as Education Cess and Rs. 22,426/- as Higher Education Cess be not demanded and recovered under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Interest, penalty and seizure of vehicle as also penalty for abetting for commission of the offence be not imposed. Vide letter dated 17-2-2011, the Additional Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate, Ghaziabad had informed that the seized goods can be released provisionally after completing the prescribed formalities i.e. after execution of the B-11 Bond equal to the value of goods seized backed by security equal to 25% of the Bond amount.
Appellant’s Contention-Sri Sinha, learned Counsel submitted that the petitioner was prepared to deposit the amount of excise duty and penalty which may be imposed on the seized goods and, thereafter, the seized goods be released. A further plea was raised that the respondents were not supplying the legible copies of the relied upon documents in the show cause notice and, therefore, the petitioner was not in a position to submit the explanation/reply. He submitted that on account of the seizure of the goods, the petitioner’s business was being adversely affected.
Respondent’s Contention-Sri Kesarwani, learnedSenior Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondents No. 1 & 2 , submitted that regarding the grievance of not providing the legible copies of the relied upon documents, the same did not hold good, as on 19-12-2011, the legible copies of all the relied upon documents were given to the petitioner. Photostat copy of the acknowledgement given by Sandeep Gupta, the proprietor was also produced. This fact has not been disputed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Thus, the grievance of not supplying of legible copies of relied upon documents did no longer exist.
 
Reasoning Of Judgement- it was held thatSo far as the question of release of the seized goods were concerned, bench may mention here that in the show cause notice dated 25-1-2011, the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence, Delhi had specifically asked the petitioner to show cause as to why the goods seized from the premises of M/s. Sandeep Metal Supply and M/s. Sandeep Manufacturing Strips be not confiscated. Adjudication proceedings were yet to be finalised. If ultimately, the authority comes to the conclusion that the seized goods were liable to be confiscated, then in the discretion of the adjudicating authority, an option can be given to the offending party to redeem it on payment of certain amount. What would be that amount at present was only a guess which bench were not inclined to make.
The submission of Sri Sinha that the seized goods may be released on deposit of the amount of Excise duty which was likely to be levied, if accepted at this stage even when the adjudication proceedings were yet to be completed would set at naught the statutory provisions which provided for confiscation of seized goods and its release on payment of redemption amount. Bench may mention here that the duty and penalty which may be imposed was in addition to the confiscation of goods, if ordered and was not in lieu thereof. That being the position, bench cannot direct the release of seized goods on payment of Excise duty and penalty, which may be imposed.
Bench herein observed that the adjudication proceedings have been pending since 25-1-2011. For one reason or the other, it has been held up. As the legible copies of relied upon documents have already been supplied to the petitioner on 19-12-2011, bench directed the petitioner to submit his reply/explanation within a period of one month from today and the Respondent No. 1 or the authorised officer, who had issued the notice dated 25-1-2011 shall pass the final order in accordance with law within one month thereafter.
Decision- writ dismissed.
Comment-The kernel of the case was that when a search is conducted and the goods are seized/ detained then goods cannot be released merely on payment of duty and penalty. As here the adjudication proceedings were not concluded and Quantum of redemption fine was not known  ordering release of goods would make statutory confiscation provision redundant. Since payment of duty and penalty is not in lieu of redemption fine, release of seized goods was held to be not permissible.
Prepared By-arundhati bajpai

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com