Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   RTI applicant in Madhya Pradesh asked to pay GST for information *   India’s GST collection drops to Rs93,960cr in August *   Karnataka Taxmen arrest two Bengaluru businessmen in GST related fraud *  Govt may soon impose IGST on ex-factory sales; decision in September. *  Niti Aayog Suggests Slashing Import Duty, GST On Gold *  Kerala Floods: Relief Goods Exempted From Customs Duty, IGST *  No GST On Petrol, Diesel In Near Future As Centre, States Not In Favour. *  Kerala plans to raise Rs 7.5 bn through hiked liquor duty & 10% cess on GST. *  Orissa HC directs authorities not to take action against importers on GST. *  Firms can't be selective in passing on rate cut benefits under GST regime *  Technical glitches continue to haunt the Goods and Services Tax Network *  GST Annual Return: Everything you need to know about the format, eligibility & rules around GSTR 9  *  Post GST, J&K’s own tax collection drops by Rs 1,300 crore since July 2017 *  GST Council may replace 12% and 18% slabs with 14-15% one: Sushil Modi *  Domino’s lands in trouble for not passing on GST cuts *   Higher oil prices, GST may boost states revenue by Rs 37,400 crore in FY19  *   These taxpayers no more at mercy of GST intermediaries *  Budget 2018: No fiscal derailment, but a lot rides on GST; expect caution from RBI *  GST: E-way bill implementation deferred due to glitches *  Homebuyers must avoid traps on the name of NO GST Impact *   Govt will formulate a comprehensive gold policy to develop gold as an asset class *   Government to evolve to asign a unique id to every individual enterprise. *   1.48 lakh crore for rail budget. *   7148 Crore to be sanctioned to textile sector. *   3700 corore for SME industry *  16000 crore for free electricity connection *   Government ignored warnings over GST rollout: sources *  GSTR 3B questionaire introduced- To be filled before filing return *  Advisory mail  to all the taxpayers received from GSTN *   Advisory group on GST submits report, suggests changes
Subject News *  Consumer durables firms, GST body continue to spar over profiteering *   225 million e-way bills generated across India since GST rollout *   September last month to fix GST filing errors *   Due date of TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 is extended *   Extension of Due date for GSTR-3B only for newly migrated taxpayers *   Extension of Due date for GSTR-1 *   Taxpayer with turnover over Rs 2 cr need GST audit certificate, will be arduous job for auditors *   Whether the appellants are eligible for refund of the duty claimed to have been paid in excess on the basis of DMT of the goods? Whether the said claim of refund is sustainable without challenging the assessment of the shipping bills. (Source:PJ/CASE LAW/2018-2019/3479) *   GST Flash Updates on various circulars and notifications dated 04/09/2018 *   GST Update on Circular No. 61/2018-GST dated 04.09.2018 *   GST Update on disharmony in CGST and SGST *    Update on restriction of refund of IGST paid on exports under Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules *   1,800 businesses migrate to GST regime *   ‘Missing’ service tax credit in GST update worries companies  *   Government notifies new annual return form for GST *  Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff. *  : Whether processing of secondary raw materials(steel scrap of different and variable composition) into blended steel scrap is liable for payment of central excise duty under the provision of the central excise Act,1944?Can  such “blended metal scrap” can be classified under tariff item 72044900 of the central excise tariff Act, 1985? *  Whether the transportation of goods by means of hired vehicles such that no consignment note is issued, would fall under the category of Goods Transport Agency Service? *  Whether the applicant is eligible to avail the benefit of exemption from payment of SAD provided under Notification No. 21/2012-Cus. *  Whether the polyester sewing thread manufactured by the appellant is excisable or not. *  INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIAMOND GRADING & RESEARCH INDIA P. LTD. *  Whether grading and inscription of diamonds by the appellant (IIDGR India Private Limited) would amount to manufacture under Central Excise legislation. *  What is the classification when frozen meat is sold in packaged form and rate of tax to be applicable? *  Is the unutilized cenvat credit available before surrender of registration transferable to the new unit? *  Whether Kindle device is covered under Tariff Item 8543 70 99 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or not? *  GST Council considering Kerala government's proposal of 'calamity tax' *  Orissa HC directs authorities not to take action against importers on GST *  Whether the assessee on filing of second appeal before Tribunal is required to make an additional pre-deposit of 10% of the duty and penalty in dispute? *  Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff? *  Niti Aayog Suggests Slashing Import Duty, GST On Gold  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-2017/3445

can seized goods be released after payment of duty and penalty?

Case-SANDEEP GUPTA versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
Citation-2017(345) E.L.T.79 (ALL.)
Issue-can seized goods be released after payment of duty and penalty?
Brief Facts- The facts of the present case are that the petitioner is the proprietor of the firms M/s. Sandeep Manufacturing Strips (a manufacturing unit) and M/s. Sandeep Metal Supply (a trading company). The manufacturing unit was situated at Loni, Ghaziabad whereas the trading unit was situated at Chawri Bazar, Delhi. The two units of which the petitioner was the proprietor were engaged in manufacturing and trading respectively of copper items falling under Chapter Heading 74 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. A search was conducted in the premises of M/s. Sandeep Manufacturing Strips, Loni, Ghaziabad and the goods were seized/detained vide Panchanama order dated 27-10-2010. The business premises of M/s. Sandeep Metal Supply was also searched and the goods were seized/detained vide Panchanama of even date.The contention of the petitioner was that there was no illegality in the business activities of the petitioner and, therefore, the search and detention affected on 27-7-2010 was illegal. The detention order was liable to be lifted.
It appeared that a show cause notice was issued by the Directorate General Central Excise Intelligence, New Delhi on 25-1-2011 calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why the items of copper seized from the premises of M/s. Sandeep Metal Supply weighing 5317.11 Kgs. and valued at Rs. 1,91,43,040/- be not confiscated under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and further 4522 Kgs. of Copper ingots, 4413 Kgs. of copper strips seized from the factory premises of M/s. Sandeep Metal Strips, Loni, Ghaziabad be also not confiscated under the aforesaid Rules. A sum of Rs. 22,42,584/- towards Central Excise duty and Rs. 44,852/- as Education Cess and Rs. 22,426/- as Higher Education Cess be not demanded and recovered under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Interest, penalty and seizure of vehicle as also penalty for abetting for commission of the offence be not imposed. Vide letter dated 17-2-2011, the Additional Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate, Ghaziabad had informed that the seized goods can be released provisionally after completing the prescribed formalities i.e. after execution of the B-11 Bond equal to the value of goods seized backed by security equal to 25% of the Bond amount.
Appellant’s Contention-Sri Sinha, learned Counsel submitted that the petitioner was prepared to deposit the amount of excise duty and penalty which may be imposed on the seized goods and, thereafter, the seized goods be released. A further plea was raised that the respondents were not supplying the legible copies of the relied upon documents in the show cause notice and, therefore, the petitioner was not in a position to submit the explanation/reply. He submitted that on account of the seizure of the goods, the petitioner’s business was being adversely affected.
Respondent’s Contention-Sri Kesarwani, learnedSenior Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondents No. 1 & 2 , submitted that regarding the grievance of not providing the legible copies of the relied upon documents, the same did not hold good, as on 19-12-2011, the legible copies of all the relied upon documents were given to the petitioner. Photostat copy of the acknowledgement given by Sandeep Gupta, the proprietor was also produced. This fact has not been disputed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Thus, the grievance of not supplying of legible copies of relied upon documents did no longer exist.
 
Reasoning Of Judgement- it was held thatSo far as the question of release of the seized goods were concerned, bench may mention here that in the show cause notice dated 25-1-2011, the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence, Delhi had specifically asked the petitioner to show cause as to why the goods seized from the premises of M/s. Sandeep Metal Supply and M/s. Sandeep Manufacturing Strips be not confiscated. Adjudication proceedings were yet to be finalised. If ultimately, the authority comes to the conclusion that the seized goods were liable to be confiscated, then in the discretion of the adjudicating authority, an option can be given to the offending party to redeem it on payment of certain amount. What would be that amount at present was only a guess which bench were not inclined to make.
The submission of Sri Sinha that the seized goods may be released on deposit of the amount of Excise duty which was likely to be levied, if accepted at this stage even when the adjudication proceedings were yet to be completed would set at naught the statutory provisions which provided for confiscation of seized goods and its release on payment of redemption amount. Bench may mention here that the duty and penalty which may be imposed was in addition to the confiscation of goods, if ordered and was not in lieu thereof. That being the position, bench cannot direct the release of seized goods on payment of Excise duty and penalty, which may be imposed.
Bench herein observed that the adjudication proceedings have been pending since 25-1-2011. For one reason or the other, it has been held up. As the legible copies of relied upon documents have already been supplied to the petitioner on 19-12-2011, bench directed the petitioner to submit his reply/explanation within a period of one month from today and the Respondent No. 1 or the authorised officer, who had issued the notice dated 25-1-2011 shall pass the final order in accordance with law within one month thereafter.
Decision- writ dismissed.
Comment-The kernel of the case was that when a search is conducted and the goods are seized/ detained then goods cannot be released merely on payment of duty and penalty. As here the adjudication proceedings were not concluded and Quantum of redemption fine was not known  ordering release of goods would make statutory confiscation provision redundant. Since payment of duty and penalty is not in lieu of redemption fine, release of seized goods was held to be not permissible.
Prepared By-arundhati bajpai

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com