Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   Government extends deadline for GST returns filing for taxpayers affected by cyclones *  GST on banks' 'free services' may be passed on to customers *   Govt staring at a shortfall of Rs 500 bn to Rs 1 trn in GST collection? *  Ministry seeks to bring aviation fuel under GST. *  Centre, states apportion Rs 33,000 cr IGST in November. *  GST: Government Extends Deadline For Filing TDS Returns For Oct.-Dec. To January 2019 *  Indirect Tax Evasion During April-October Stands At Rs 29,088 Crore *   Tax Collection Growing By 15-20 Per Cent Every Year: Arun Jaitley *   GST Compensation Paid To States Declines To Rs 11,900 Crore in August-September *  GST Practitioners Enrollment Exam In December *  GST can’t be Deducted from Salary of Employees sponsored by UPNL: Uttarakhand HC *  Chennai businessman held for Rs 61 crore GST evasion . *  Govt issues Advisory to UIN Entities claiming GST Refunds *  GST paid under a Wrong Head by Mistake can be Transferred to the Right Head: Kerala HC *  CBIC clarifies Scope of Principal and Agent Relationship *  Tea Board of India liable to collect TCS from Tea producers and Auctioneers: CBIC *  Rs 82,775 Cr to Exporters Cleared, Rs 5,400 Cr Pending as on Oct 31 *  Kerala HC orders to take Photographs of Goods since Issue was Misclassification *  Changes in E-way Bill from 16th November 2018 *  Over 2 lakh assessees who migrated from VAT regime opt out of GST net *  GST Practitioners Enrollment Exam In December *   Bombay HC asks Petitioners seeking amendment in GST TRAN 1 to make representation before CBIC; directs CBIC to address within 12 weeks *   Congress will bring single slab GST: Rahul Gandhi *   Centre, states apportion Rs 32,000 crore IGST in October *   GST payers to be divided into four categories for targeted approach *   Centre contemplating bringing petrol, diesel under GST *    Event Management Support Services provided in Goa to a Registered Person in Maharashtra subject to Integrated GST: AAR   *   Haryana to form GST Appellate Tribunal *  Unprecedented tax reforms undertaken by Indian Customs for enhancing easy of doing business. *  Companies rush to match input tax credit with vendor returns
Subject News *   GST returns witness substantial increase in J&K: Tax dept *   Banks to impose GST on ATM usage, issue of cheque books, additional credit cards *   Realtors want different GST rates based on location of projects *  Keeping it simple: Reconciliation of GST data in 5 steps. *  India Inc seeks more time for filing GST annual returns, audit reports. *  Simplified GST return forms to be rolled out from April 1: Revenue Secretary *  CAIT urges FM Arun Jaitley to extend last date for GST filing to March 2019 . *  Air conditioners, TVs may get cheaper as GST Council likely to slash tax rate to 18% *  Key points for first ever filing of GST Annual returns. *  Government extends GST annual return filing date to March 31, 2019 *  Furnishing GST annual return extend deadline by 3 months: ICAI to CBIC *  Credit to MSEs up 5 times to Rs 1.23 lakh crore post GST: SBI study *  Need GST Council like federal institution in healthcare, farm sector: Arun Jaitley. *   How GST will cruise ahead with new-age tech ? *  GST a ‘monumental reform’: finance minister Arun Jaitley *  AB Pandey takes over as revenue secy; to focus on enhanced tax compliance via technology integration.   *  GST revenue mop up at ₹97,637 cr in Nov *   Process of getting ATF under GST bracket underway, says Jayant Sinha *   Arun Jaitley to present interim budget in February, may include tax measures *   Tax soup for restaurants not sharing service charges with staff *   Amendments to State GST Act introduced *  NAA drops Anti-profiteering charges against Fab India. *  Gur-ta-Gaddi Tercentenary Celebration is a Religious Event: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand for setting up Temporary Camps  *  Strange Attitude of Dept insisting Payment of Tax in Cash or DD is against the Spirit of GST: Kerala HC *  Levy of GST on Liquor License Fees. *  GST Evasion: Two more arrested in Hyderabad *  CBIC to Monitor Grievances of MSMEs on a Daily basis *  India's economic growth held back due to note ban, GST: Raghuram Rajan *  Bengaluru:Rs 1,200 Crore GST Fraud Busted *   Re-Opening of GST TRAN-1 to Rectify Errors; Bombay HC asks CBIC to resolve Issue within 12 Weeks.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-2017/3445

can seized goods be released after payment of duty and penalty?

Case-SANDEEP GUPTA versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
Citation-2017(345) E.L.T.79 (ALL.)
Issue-can seized goods be released after payment of duty and penalty?
Brief Facts- The facts of the present case are that the petitioner is the proprietor of the firms M/s. Sandeep Manufacturing Strips (a manufacturing unit) and M/s. Sandeep Metal Supply (a trading company). The manufacturing unit was situated at Loni, Ghaziabad whereas the trading unit was situated at Chawri Bazar, Delhi. The two units of which the petitioner was the proprietor were engaged in manufacturing and trading respectively of copper items falling under Chapter Heading 74 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. A search was conducted in the premises of M/s. Sandeep Manufacturing Strips, Loni, Ghaziabad and the goods were seized/detained vide Panchanama order dated 27-10-2010. The business premises of M/s. Sandeep Metal Supply was also searched and the goods were seized/detained vide Panchanama of even date.The contention of the petitioner was that there was no illegality in the business activities of the petitioner and, therefore, the search and detention affected on 27-7-2010 was illegal. The detention order was liable to be lifted.
It appeared that a show cause notice was issued by the Directorate General Central Excise Intelligence, New Delhi on 25-1-2011 calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why the items of copper seized from the premises of M/s. Sandeep Metal Supply weighing 5317.11 Kgs. and valued at Rs. 1,91,43,040/- be not confiscated under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and further 4522 Kgs. of Copper ingots, 4413 Kgs. of copper strips seized from the factory premises of M/s. Sandeep Metal Strips, Loni, Ghaziabad be also not confiscated under the aforesaid Rules. A sum of Rs. 22,42,584/- towards Central Excise duty and Rs. 44,852/- as Education Cess and Rs. 22,426/- as Higher Education Cess be not demanded and recovered under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Interest, penalty and seizure of vehicle as also penalty for abetting for commission of the offence be not imposed. Vide letter dated 17-2-2011, the Additional Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate, Ghaziabad had informed that the seized goods can be released provisionally after completing the prescribed formalities i.e. after execution of the B-11 Bond equal to the value of goods seized backed by security equal to 25% of the Bond amount.
Appellant’s Contention-Sri Sinha, learned Counsel submitted that the petitioner was prepared to deposit the amount of excise duty and penalty which may be imposed on the seized goods and, thereafter, the seized goods be released. A further plea was raised that the respondents were not supplying the legible copies of the relied upon documents in the show cause notice and, therefore, the petitioner was not in a position to submit the explanation/reply. He submitted that on account of the seizure of the goods, the petitioner’s business was being adversely affected.
Respondent’s Contention-Sri Kesarwani, learnedSenior Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondents No. 1 & 2 , submitted that regarding the grievance of not providing the legible copies of the relied upon documents, the same did not hold good, as on 19-12-2011, the legible copies of all the relied upon documents were given to the petitioner. Photostat copy of the acknowledgement given by Sandeep Gupta, the proprietor was also produced. This fact has not been disputed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Thus, the grievance of not supplying of legible copies of relied upon documents did no longer exist.
 
Reasoning Of Judgement- it was held thatSo far as the question of release of the seized goods were concerned, bench may mention here that in the show cause notice dated 25-1-2011, the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence, Delhi had specifically asked the petitioner to show cause as to why the goods seized from the premises of M/s. Sandeep Metal Supply and M/s. Sandeep Manufacturing Strips be not confiscated. Adjudication proceedings were yet to be finalised. If ultimately, the authority comes to the conclusion that the seized goods were liable to be confiscated, then in the discretion of the adjudicating authority, an option can be given to the offending party to redeem it on payment of certain amount. What would be that amount at present was only a guess which bench were not inclined to make.
The submission of Sri Sinha that the seized goods may be released on deposit of the amount of Excise duty which was likely to be levied, if accepted at this stage even when the adjudication proceedings were yet to be completed would set at naught the statutory provisions which provided for confiscation of seized goods and its release on payment of redemption amount. Bench may mention here that the duty and penalty which may be imposed was in addition to the confiscation of goods, if ordered and was not in lieu thereof. That being the position, bench cannot direct the release of seized goods on payment of Excise duty and penalty, which may be imposed.
Bench herein observed that the adjudication proceedings have been pending since 25-1-2011. For one reason or the other, it has been held up. As the legible copies of relied upon documents have already been supplied to the petitioner on 19-12-2011, bench directed the petitioner to submit his reply/explanation within a period of one month from today and the Respondent No. 1 or the authorised officer, who had issued the notice dated 25-1-2011 shall pass the final order in accordance with law within one month thereafter.
Decision- writ dismissed.
Comment-The kernel of the case was that when a search is conducted and the goods are seized/ detained then goods cannot be released merely on payment of duty and penalty. As here the adjudication proceedings were not concluded and Quantum of redemption fine was not known  ordering release of goods would make statutory confiscation provision redundant. Since payment of duty and penalty is not in lieu of redemption fine, release of seized goods was held to be not permissible.
Prepared By-arundhati bajpai

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com