Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2013-14/2021

Applicability of service tax on testing and analysis of IT software w.e.f 16/05/2008.

Case:- COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE Vs AZTECSOFT LTD.
 
Citation:- 2013-TIOL-1541-CESTAT-MUM
 
Brief facts:-The appellant, M/s. Aztecsoft Ltd., Pune, were engaged in providing services relating to testing and analysis of computer software for their clients located in India and abroad during the period 01/07/2003 to 31/03/2008. However, they did not take any service tax registration nor did they discharge any service tax liability. Accordingly, two show-cause notices were issued to the appellant, one dated 20/10/2008 demanding service tax of Rs.6,27,69,689/- for the period July 2007 to March 2008 and another notice dated Feb 2008 demanding service tax of Rs.15,12,19,673/- for the period 01/07/2003 to 31/03/2007. The notices proposed to recover interest on the above demands apart from imposing penalties. Both these notices were adjudicated by the impugned order and the Ld. Commissioner dropped the demands on the ground that testing IT software was not part of the technical testing and analysis service until 2008 and the activity of development of IT software itself was excluded from the scope of service tax until 2008 and therefore, the service tax demand cannot be sustained.
 
Appellant’s contentions:- The Hon'ble apex Court in the case of TCS Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, 2004 (178) ELT 22(SC) = (2004-TIOL-87-SC-CT-LB) had held that “software in India” is goods for the purpose of levy of sales tax. Similarly, the CBEC vide Circular No.81/2/2005-ST dated 07/10/2005 had clarified that maintenance or repair of software was leviable to service tax under the maintenance or repair service. Therefore, testing of software, being goods, would come within the purview of technical testing and analysis with effect from 01/07/2003 onwards. The reliance placed by theCommissioner on the Stag Software Pvt. Ltd. case (cited supra) was not correct as the Tribunal in that case committed an error in interpreting the judgment of the Hon'ble apex Court in the case of TCS by holding that only canned software can be goods.
 
Respondent’s contentions:- The Ld. Counsel for the respondent submitted that testing of IT software was made specifically taxable from 16/05/2008 under the category of technical testing and analysis service and therefore prior to that date the said activity was not leviable to service tax. He also submitted that testing of software was integral to and forming part of software design and development activity and IT software services were brought under the tax net with effect from 16/05/2008 and therefore, the adjudicating authority has correctly dropped the demand. He also relied on the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Stag Software Pvt. Ltd., (cited supra) andRelq Software Pvt. Ltd., Vs. CST, Bangalore, reported in2009 (14) STR 779 = (2008-TIOL-2573-CESTAT-BANG) and the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the same case reported in2011 (23) STR 449 (Kar).
 
Reasoning of judgment:- According to Hon’ble judge Prior to 16/05/2005 Section 65(106) of Finance Act, 1994 defined technical testing and analysis as follows:
 
“Technical testing and analysis means any service in relation to physical, chemical ,biological or any other scientific testing or analysis of goods or material or an immovable property but does not include any testing or analysis service provided in relation to the human beings or animals."
 
The said definition was amended in the Finance Act, 2008 and the amended definition reads as follows:
 
“Technical testing and analysis means any service in relation to physical, chemical, biological or any other scientific testing or analysis of goods or material or information technology software or any immoveable property but does not include any testing or analysis service provided in relation to the human beings or animals”.
 
Information technology service was brought under the service tax net with effect from 16/07/2008. Consequently, the activity of testing and analysis of IT software was also brought into the tax net by amending the definition. If IT software was already included within the scope of technical testing and analysis service, there was no need for any amendment to be specifically made in Section 65(106). In the budget instructions issued vide letter 334/1/2008-TRU dated 29/02/2008, in para 4 thereof, it has been specifically stated that service provided in relation to information technology (IT) software for use in the course or furtherance, of business or commerce has been specifically included in the list of taxable service vide Section65 (105) (zzzze). In para 4.1.7, it has been stated that following consequential amendments in other taxable services are also being made, namely, to include testing and analysis of IT software services under technical testing and analysis service (Section 65(105) (zzh). Similar amendments were made in the scope of business auxiliary service, technical inspection and certification service, management, maintenance or repair of properties, consulting engineer's service, etc. to bring activities relating to IT software in the tax net in the aforesaid categories. This Tribunal in the case of Relq Software Pvt. Ltd. (cited supra) had also held that testing and analysis of IT software would be effective only from 16/05/2008 when the said activity was specifically included under technical testing and analysis service. The said decision of the Tribunal was also upheld by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the same case cited supra.
 
In view of the above position, hon’ble judge were of the considered view that testing and analysis of IT software would be leviable to service tax only with effect from 16/05/2008 and therefore, there is no infirmity in the impugned order passed by the adjudicating authority. Thus, the appeal filed by the Revenue is devoid of merits and is dismissed.
 
Decision:- Appeal was dismissed.
 
Comments:- The essence of this case is that the Information technology service was brought under the service tax net with effect from 16/07/2008. Consequently, the activity of testing and analysis of IT software was also brought into the tax net by amending the definition. If IT software was already included within the scope of technical testing and analysis service, there was no need for any amendment to be specifically made in the definition of technical testing and analysis service. Thus, testing and analysis of IT software would be leviable to service tax only with effect from 16/05/2008.
 
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com