Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2013-14/2021

Applicability of service tax on testing and analysis of IT software w.e.f 16/05/2008.

Case:- COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE Vs AZTECSOFT LTD.
 
Citation:- 2013-TIOL-1541-CESTAT-MUM
 
Brief facts:-The appellant, M/s. Aztecsoft Ltd., Pune, were engaged in providing services relating to testing and analysis of computer software for their clients located in India and abroad during the period 01/07/2003 to 31/03/2008. However, they did not take any service tax registration nor did they discharge any service tax liability. Accordingly, two show-cause notices were issued to the appellant, one dated 20/10/2008 demanding service tax of Rs.6,27,69,689/- for the period July 2007 to March 2008 and another notice dated Feb 2008 demanding service tax of Rs.15,12,19,673/- for the period 01/07/2003 to 31/03/2007. The notices proposed to recover interest on the above demands apart from imposing penalties. Both these notices were adjudicated by the impugned order and the Ld. Commissioner dropped the demands on the ground that testing IT software was not part of the technical testing and analysis service until 2008 and the activity of development of IT software itself was excluded from the scope of service tax until 2008 and therefore, the service tax demand cannot be sustained.
 
Appellant’s contentions:- The Hon'ble apex Court in the case of TCS Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, 2004 (178) ELT 22(SC) = (2004-TIOL-87-SC-CT-LB) had held that “software in India” is goods for the purpose of levy of sales tax. Similarly, the CBEC vide Circular No.81/2/2005-ST dated 07/10/2005 had clarified that maintenance or repair of software was leviable to service tax under the maintenance or repair service. Therefore, testing of software, being goods, would come within the purview of technical testing and analysis with effect from 01/07/2003 onwards. The reliance placed by theCommissioner on the Stag Software Pvt. Ltd. case (cited supra) was not correct as the Tribunal in that case committed an error in interpreting the judgment of the Hon'ble apex Court in the case of TCS by holding that only canned software can be goods.
 
Respondent’s contentions:- The Ld. Counsel for the respondent submitted that testing of IT software was made specifically taxable from 16/05/2008 under the category of technical testing and analysis service and therefore prior to that date the said activity was not leviable to service tax. He also submitted that testing of software was integral to and forming part of software design and development activity and IT software services were brought under the tax net with effect from 16/05/2008 and therefore, the adjudicating authority has correctly dropped the demand. He also relied on the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Stag Software Pvt. Ltd., (cited supra) andRelq Software Pvt. Ltd., Vs. CST, Bangalore, reported in2009 (14) STR 779 = (2008-TIOL-2573-CESTAT-BANG) and the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the same case reported in2011 (23) STR 449 (Kar).
 
Reasoning of judgment:- According to Hon’ble judge Prior to 16/05/2005 Section 65(106) of Finance Act, 1994 defined technical testing and analysis as follows:
 
“Technical testing and analysis means any service in relation to physical, chemical ,biological or any other scientific testing or analysis of goods or material or an immovable property but does not include any testing or analysis service provided in relation to the human beings or animals."
 
The said definition was amended in the Finance Act, 2008 and the amended definition reads as follows:
 
“Technical testing and analysis means any service in relation to physical, chemical, biological or any other scientific testing or analysis of goods or material or information technology software or any immoveable property but does not include any testing or analysis service provided in relation to the human beings or animals”.
 
Information technology service was brought under the service tax net with effect from 16/07/2008. Consequently, the activity of testing and analysis of IT software was also brought into the tax net by amending the definition. If IT software was already included within the scope of technical testing and analysis service, there was no need for any amendment to be specifically made in Section 65(106). In the budget instructions issued vide letter 334/1/2008-TRU dated 29/02/2008, in para 4 thereof, it has been specifically stated that service provided in relation to information technology (IT) software for use in the course or furtherance, of business or commerce has been specifically included in the list of taxable service vide Section65 (105) (zzzze). In para 4.1.7, it has been stated that following consequential amendments in other taxable services are also being made, namely, to include testing and analysis of IT software services under technical testing and analysis service (Section 65(105) (zzh). Similar amendments were made in the scope of business auxiliary service, technical inspection and certification service, management, maintenance or repair of properties, consulting engineer's service, etc. to bring activities relating to IT software in the tax net in the aforesaid categories. This Tribunal in the case of Relq Software Pvt. Ltd. (cited supra) had also held that testing and analysis of IT software would be effective only from 16/05/2008 when the said activity was specifically included under technical testing and analysis service. The said decision of the Tribunal was also upheld by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the same case cited supra.
 
In view of the above position, hon’ble judge were of the considered view that testing and analysis of IT software would be leviable to service tax only with effect from 16/05/2008 and therefore, there is no infirmity in the impugned order passed by the adjudicating authority. Thus, the appeal filed by the Revenue is devoid of merits and is dismissed.
 
Decision:- Appeal was dismissed.
 
Comments:- The essence of this case is that the Information technology service was brought under the service tax net with effect from 16/07/2008. Consequently, the activity of testing and analysis of IT software was also brought into the tax net by amending the definition. If IT software was already included within the scope of technical testing and analysis service, there was no need for any amendment to be specifically made in the definition of technical testing and analysis service. Thus, testing and analysis of IT software would be leviable to service tax only with effect from 16/05/2008.
 
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com