Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2011-12/1143

Activity of road work - whether classifiable under 'Management, maintenance or repair service'

Case: Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Dev. Ltd v/s CST, Bangalore
 
Citation:2011 (22) STR 22 (Tri-Bang)
 
Issue: - Whether activity of road works fall under ‘management, maintenance or repair’ of immovable property or construction service – Board Circular clarifying the issue not before the Adjudicating Authority – aspect of construction and supply of material not considered – matter remanded for fresh adjudication.
 
Brief Facts: -Appellant is Govt of Karnataka undertaking and is engaged in the construction of building, roads, and other civil works for Govt of Karnataka. They are registered under service tax for providing Consulting Engineer Service. Appellant were also engaged in the activity of maintenance of roads, construction of drainage, Upgradation of sidewalks, asphalting of roads etc as per agreement with various Govt agencies.
 
Revenue officers sought verification of records and after verification, they noticed that for the period 15.10.2005 to 30.11.2006 and 01.12.2006 to 31.03.2008, appellant had executed various contracts to complete the work of Upgradation of side-walks, asphalting of roads and strengthening of footpaths and re-surfacing of the various roads for various State Government agencies including municipalities and municipal corporations.
 
Revenue alleged that appellant was required to pay service on these services under the category of ‘management, maintenance or repair’ of immovable property service and issued show cause notices. The Demand of service tax with interest was confirmed and penalty was also imposed under Section 76 & 77 but no penalty was imposed under Section 78.   
 
Appellant is in appeal against the impugned orders.
 
Appellant’s Contention:  - Appellant contended that their activity did not fall under the category of ‘management, maintenance or repair’ of immovable property as roads were not immovable property but they were public property and fell within the jurisprudence of eminent domain/sovereign domain and therefore excludable from the category of immovable property. It was submitted that the activity was done of public property and could not be held liable to service tax as the said activity has been specifically excluded from statutory definitions.
 
Alternatively, it was submitted that the activity done by them would more appropriately fall under commercial or industrial services and under the same, there is specific exclusion for the activity undertaken in or in relation to roads. It was submitted that the definition of ‘work contract’ would also exclude the activity done in respect of roads etc. It was submitted that the activity undertaken by them could not be taxed under some other category when it is specifically mentioned in specific heading. As per the principles of classification, specific head would exclude the general heading.
 
It was also submitted that the Adjudicating Authority had held that there is no need for invocation of extended period but had confirmed the entire demand for entire period. It was further submitted that the contracts entered by the appellants with various authorities were of composite nature and hence the entire activity could not he categorized under head ‘management, maintenance or repair’ of immovable property.
 
Respondent’s contention:- Revenue contended that public road although fell under sovereign domain but was an immovable property also. Reliance was placed on Board Circular F. No. B-1/6/2005-TRU, dt. 27.7.2005 and it was submitted that this activity is covered under the category of ‘management, maintenance or repair’ of immovable property.
 
Reasoning of Judgment: - The Tribunal held that from the record it appears that there is categorical mention of “construction of drains, providing drain covers, providing cement concrete and cobble stone for footpath, providing cement concrete kerbs, asphalting of roads and various other activities”. It was noticed that there could be a construction activity and also there could be supply of materials. The Adjudicating Authorities have not considered the factual position regarding construction activity and supplies aspect. It was found by the Tribunal that the Board in Circular No. 110/4/2009-ST dated 23.02.2009 has given a clarification regarding the levy of service tax on repair/renovation/widening of roads. It has been specifically provided therein that which activity will fall under ‘management, maintenance or repair’ of immovable property and which will fall under the category of construction activity.
 
Thus, the Tribunal held that the issue requires re-examination as the Board Circular dated 23.02.2009 was not available to the Adjudicating Authority at the time of adjudication. Impugned orders set aside and matter remitted back to the Adjudicating Authority to re-consider the issue afresh.
 
Decision:- Matter remanded for fresh adjudication.
 
Comment:- This is old issue of litigation and is still going on. It has not settled even after issue of Board circular. Now the Board has given exemption to repairing of Roads.
 

****************

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com