Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Publish Date: 02 Mar, 2013
Print   |    |  Comment

Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013: A Defaulter Friendly Scheme

Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013: A Defaulter Friendly Scheme
 

An article by:-

                                                                                                                                                                                                               CA. Pradeep Jain
                                                                                                                                                                                                              CA. Preeti Parihar
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Manish Vyas
 

Introduction:-

The Hon’ble Finance Minister has announced the Union Budget 2013-14 on 28/02/2013. Only few amendments are made in service law for maintaining stability in Negative List Concept. However, a new scheme has been introduced for defaulter - service tax assessees named as “Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme”. While announcing this scheme, it was said by hon’ble Finance Minister that there are nearly 17,00,000 registered assessees under service tax, only about 7,00,000 file service tax returns. In order to self motivate the defaulters to pay the service tax, the above scheme is announced. This article is about the provisions contained in this scheme alongwith our views thereupon.
 
Object, Applicability & Benefits of Scheme:-
This object of this scheme is to encourage the defaulters of service tax (including Cess) due for the period from 01.10.2007 to 31.12.2012 which has not been paid upto 1st March 2013. The eligible assessee may voluntary declare the service tax due under this scheme and he will be refrained from imposition of interest and penalty. Once the service tax liability is paid off under this scheme, the case cannot be reopened by the department.
 
Eligibility:-
Any person can opt for this scheme, other than the following cases:-

  1. The tax dues should be such that no demand should have been proposed or confirmed before 1.3.2013;
  2. The person should not have furnished return and disclosed his true liability, but have not paid the service tax so disclosed whether in total or in part;
  3. If any show cause notice or order has been issued to a person on a particular issue, declaration cannot be made in respect of same issue for the subsequent period;

Where any declaration has been made by any person against whom -
An inquiry or investigation in respect of non/short levy or non/short-  payment service tax has been initiated against a person by way of search of premises or summons or requiring production of accounts, documents or other evidences; or an audit has been initiated against that person and such audit or inquiry/investigation is pending as on 1.3.2013. In such a case, the declaration filed by such a person will not be accepted by recording the reasons in writing.
 
Last Date For availing Scheme:-
The assessee can file the declaration under this scheme only upto 31st December 2013.
 
Manner of payment of declared dues:-
The assessee availing the scheme will have to pay minimum 50% tax dues upto 31st December 2013. The remaining amount shall be paid upto 30th June, 2014. If the declarant fails to pay said tax upto 30th June, 2014, he can pay the same upto 31st December 2014 along with interest from 1st July 2014 to the date of payment. Proof of payment is also required to be submitted to the concerned officer.
 
What if the declarant fails to pay declared dues?
As per proposed section 100, if the assessee fails to pay the tax dues, then such dues along with interest will be recovered as per provisions of Section 87. Section 87 prescribes the modes of recovery of any amount due to government. This section is harshest section of service tax law which says that the sum due to government will be treated as if it were an arrear of land revenue. Thus, the defaulted amount can be recovered by attaching the movable and immovable properties of the declarant. Simultaneously, fresh proceedings for recovery of interest and penalty can be initiated by issuing a show cause notice. This is because the proposed section 98 says that where the benefit of this scheme will be extended only after the entire payment has been made and the designated authority has issued an acknowledgement of discharge of dues.
 
Where the assessee files the substantially incorrect declaration:-
This scheme prescribes that the declarant has to file the declaration with the designated authority. Designated authority is defined as an officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise as notified by the Commissioner of Central Excise. Further, proposed section 101 provides that where the declaration is found substantially incorrect by the Commissioner, show cause notice is to be served for recovery of tax dues not paid or short paid. This section indicates that the designated authority (Assistant Commissioner) is not allowed to review the declaration and the same is to be reviewed by the Commissioner of Central Excise. Also, the show cause notice is to be issued for recovery of service tax dues, penalty and interest still not covered under the proposed provisions.  
 
Whether the honest assessees are fool!
Yes it the answer, due to following reasons:-

  • The scheme is applicable to full defaulters only. If an assessee who honestly files the returns and due any reason fails to pay service tax i.e. partly defaulter, then he will not be eligible for the scheme. But an assessee who has not filed the return and has also not paid the tax i.e. fully defaulters, will be eligible for scheme.
  • Further this scheme also prescribes that where any person has filed the declaration under this scheme and he does not pay the dues till 30.6.2014; still has option to pay the same with interest for six months only from 1.7.2014 to 31.12.2014. Penalty still not imposable.
  • Also, where the assessee makes substantially incorrect declaration, proposed section 101 provides that show cause notice is to be served for recovery of tax dues not paid or short paid. Further, this show cause notice cannot be issued after expiry of one year from the date of declaration. Also, the declaration cannot be reviewed by the designated officer, it will be reviewed by the Commissioner. Thus, even after making the incorrect declaration, there is chance of escaping and even after the declaration is substantially incorrect, the recovery can be made of service tax only as per section 101. This is another thing that the benefit of this scheme will be disallowed and another proceeding can be invoked for recovery of interest and penalty. 

 
While parting:-
While proposing the scheme, the Finance Minister said that only 700000 assessees are filing the Service Return out of 1700000 registered assessees. In the view of authors of this article, this statics may not be correct. Recently, the letters for non filing of returns have been issued in all the four range offices of Central Excise in the area the authors are practicing. However, it was found that more than 90% of the letters, as issued to their clients, this contention was found to be incorrect. While discussing this fact with the other consultants operating in their area, the same fact came out. This seems to be a software error. Therefore if Hon’ble Finance Minister has proposed this scheme based on this wrong data, then, this scheme may not turn out so useful, rather it will discourage the honest assessees. After the 24 hours of announcement of this scheme when the authors are finalizing this article, the feedback coming from their clients may be the best closing line of this article “In view of Finance Minister, this scheme may be his Master Stroke but in view of Honest Assessees it is nothing but only a “Defaulter Friendly Scheme”.
 

Comments

  • jay k sharma on 25 August, 2013 wrote:

    Pradeep ji I have read many articles,on vces by varies authors,but ur current article is quite precise,and ur ability to explain the subject in a very simple way.makes readers query solved when he endsup reading.thanks to you,as without going to sections/chapter/sub.section(which reader is not acquitted with)this scheme is truly as authors is "Defaulters Friendly"
  • jay k sharma on 25 August, 2013 wrote:

    Pradeep ji I have read many articles,on vces by varies authors,but ur current article is quite precise,and ur ability to explain the subject in a very simple way.makes readers query solved when he endsup reading.thanks to you,as without going to sections/chapter/sub.section(which reader is not acquitted with)this scheme is truly as authors is "Defaulters Friendly"
  • rangaswamy r on 10 April, 2013 wrote:

    Dear Mr.Jain, Your article is informative and thought-provoking. What happens to a person who had not registered but is now willing to opt for amnesty scheme? Can he now register and pay tax? Regards

Post a Comment



Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com