Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 02 Mar, 2013
Print   |    |  Comment

Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013: A Defaulter Friendly Scheme

Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013: A Defaulter Friendly Scheme
 

An article by:-

                                                                                                                                                                                                               CA. Pradeep Jain
                                                                                                                                                                                                              CA. Preeti Parihar
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Manish Vyas
 

Introduction:-

The Hon’ble Finance Minister has announced the Union Budget 2013-14 on 28/02/2013. Only few amendments are made in service law for maintaining stability in Negative List Concept. However, a new scheme has been introduced for defaulter - service tax assessees named as “Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme”. While announcing this scheme, it was said by hon’ble Finance Minister that there are nearly 17,00,000 registered assessees under service tax, only about 7,00,000 file service tax returns. In order to self motivate the defaulters to pay the service tax, the above scheme is announced. This article is about the provisions contained in this scheme alongwith our views thereupon.
 
Object, Applicability & Benefits of Scheme:-
This object of this scheme is to encourage the defaulters of service tax (including Cess) due for the period from 01.10.2007 to 31.12.2012 which has not been paid upto 1st March 2013. The eligible assessee may voluntary declare the service tax due under this scheme and he will be refrained from imposition of interest and penalty. Once the service tax liability is paid off under this scheme, the case cannot be reopened by the department.
 
Eligibility:-
Any person can opt for this scheme, other than the following cases:-

  1. The tax dues should be such that no demand should have been proposed or confirmed before 1.3.2013;
  2. The person should not have furnished return and disclosed his true liability, but have not paid the service tax so disclosed whether in total or in part;
  3. If any show cause notice or order has been issued to a person on a particular issue, declaration cannot be made in respect of same issue for the subsequent period;

Where any declaration has been made by any person against whom -
An inquiry or investigation in respect of non/short levy or non/short-  payment service tax has been initiated against a person by way of search of premises or summons or requiring production of accounts, documents or other evidences; or an audit has been initiated against that person and such audit or inquiry/investigation is pending as on 1.3.2013. In such a case, the declaration filed by such a person will not be accepted by recording the reasons in writing.
 
Last Date For availing Scheme:-
The assessee can file the declaration under this scheme only upto 31st December 2013.
 
Manner of payment of declared dues:-
The assessee availing the scheme will have to pay minimum 50% tax dues upto 31st December 2013. The remaining amount shall be paid upto 30th June, 2014. If the declarant fails to pay said tax upto 30th June, 2014, he can pay the same upto 31st December 2014 along with interest from 1st July 2014 to the date of payment. Proof of payment is also required to be submitted to the concerned officer.
 
What if the declarant fails to pay declared dues?
As per proposed section 100, if the assessee fails to pay the tax dues, then such dues along with interest will be recovered as per provisions of Section 87. Section 87 prescribes the modes of recovery of any amount due to government. This section is harshest section of service tax law which says that the sum due to government will be treated as if it were an arrear of land revenue. Thus, the defaulted amount can be recovered by attaching the movable and immovable properties of the declarant. Simultaneously, fresh proceedings for recovery of interest and penalty can be initiated by issuing a show cause notice. This is because the proposed section 98 says that where the benefit of this scheme will be extended only after the entire payment has been made and the designated authority has issued an acknowledgement of discharge of dues.
 
Where the assessee files the substantially incorrect declaration:-
This scheme prescribes that the declarant has to file the declaration with the designated authority. Designated authority is defined as an officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise as notified by the Commissioner of Central Excise. Further, proposed section 101 provides that where the declaration is found substantially incorrect by the Commissioner, show cause notice is to be served for recovery of tax dues not paid or short paid. This section indicates that the designated authority (Assistant Commissioner) is not allowed to review the declaration and the same is to be reviewed by the Commissioner of Central Excise. Also, the show cause notice is to be issued for recovery of service tax dues, penalty and interest still not covered under the proposed provisions.  
 
Whether the honest assessees are fool!
Yes it the answer, due to following reasons:-

  • The scheme is applicable to full defaulters only. If an assessee who honestly files the returns and due any reason fails to pay service tax i.e. partly defaulter, then he will not be eligible for the scheme. But an assessee who has not filed the return and has also not paid the tax i.e. fully defaulters, will be eligible for scheme.
  • Further this scheme also prescribes that where any person has filed the declaration under this scheme and he does not pay the dues till 30.6.2014; still has option to pay the same with interest for six months only from 1.7.2014 to 31.12.2014. Penalty still not imposable.
  • Also, where the assessee makes substantially incorrect declaration, proposed section 101 provides that show cause notice is to be served for recovery of tax dues not paid or short paid. Further, this show cause notice cannot be issued after expiry of one year from the date of declaration. Also, the declaration cannot be reviewed by the designated officer, it will be reviewed by the Commissioner. Thus, even after making the incorrect declaration, there is chance of escaping and even after the declaration is substantially incorrect, the recovery can be made of service tax only as per section 101. This is another thing that the benefit of this scheme will be disallowed and another proceeding can be invoked for recovery of interest and penalty. 

 
While parting:-
While proposing the scheme, the Finance Minister said that only 700000 assessees are filing the Service Return out of 1700000 registered assessees. In the view of authors of this article, this statics may not be correct. Recently, the letters for non filing of returns have been issued in all the four range offices of Central Excise in the area the authors are practicing. However, it was found that more than 90% of the letters, as issued to their clients, this contention was found to be incorrect. While discussing this fact with the other consultants operating in their area, the same fact came out. This seems to be a software error. Therefore if Hon’ble Finance Minister has proposed this scheme based on this wrong data, then, this scheme may not turn out so useful, rather it will discourage the honest assessees. After the 24 hours of announcement of this scheme when the authors are finalizing this article, the feedback coming from their clients may be the best closing line of this article “In view of Finance Minister, this scheme may be his Master Stroke but in view of Honest Assessees it is nothing but only a “Defaulter Friendly Scheme”.
 

Comments

  • jay k sharma on 25 August, 2013 wrote:

    Pradeep ji I have read many articles,on vces by varies authors,but ur current article is quite precise,and ur ability to explain the subject in a very simple way.makes readers query solved when he endsup reading.thanks to you,as without going to sections/chapter/sub.section(which reader is not acquitted with)this scheme is truly as authors is "Defaulters Friendly"
  • jay k sharma on 25 August, 2013 wrote:

    Pradeep ji I have read many articles,on vces by varies authors,but ur current article is quite precise,and ur ability to explain the subject in a very simple way.makes readers query solved when he endsup reading.thanks to you,as without going to sections/chapter/sub.section(which reader is not acquitted with)this scheme is truly as authors is "Defaulters Friendly"
  • rangaswamy r on 10 April, 2013 wrote:

    Dear Mr.Jain, Your article is informative and thought-provoking. What happens to a person who had not registered but is now willing to opt for amnesty scheme? Can he now register and pay tax? Regards

Post a Comment



Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com