Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Publish Date: 02 Mar, 2013
Print   |    |  Comment

Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013: A Defaulter Friendly Scheme

Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013: A Defaulter Friendly Scheme
 

An article by:-

                                                                                                                                                                                                               CA. Pradeep Jain
                                                                                                                                                                                                              CA. Preeti Parihar
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Manish Vyas
 

Introduction:-

The Hon’ble Finance Minister has announced the Union Budget 2013-14 on 28/02/2013. Only few amendments are made in service law for maintaining stability in Negative List Concept. However, a new scheme has been introduced for defaulter - service tax assessees named as “Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme”. While announcing this scheme, it was said by hon’ble Finance Minister that there are nearly 17,00,000 registered assessees under service tax, only about 7,00,000 file service tax returns. In order to self motivate the defaulters to pay the service tax, the above scheme is announced. This article is about the provisions contained in this scheme alongwith our views thereupon.
 
Object, Applicability & Benefits of Scheme:-
This object of this scheme is to encourage the defaulters of service tax (including Cess) due for the period from 01.10.2007 to 31.12.2012 which has not been paid upto 1st March 2013. The eligible assessee may voluntary declare the service tax due under this scheme and he will be refrained from imposition of interest and penalty. Once the service tax liability is paid off under this scheme, the case cannot be reopened by the department.
 
Eligibility:-
Any person can opt for this scheme, other than the following cases:-

  1. The tax dues should be such that no demand should have been proposed or confirmed before 1.3.2013;
  2. The person should not have furnished return and disclosed his true liability, but have not paid the service tax so disclosed whether in total or in part;
  3. If any show cause notice or order has been issued to a person on a particular issue, declaration cannot be made in respect of same issue for the subsequent period;

Where any declaration has been made by any person against whom -
An inquiry or investigation in respect of non/short levy or non/short-  payment service tax has been initiated against a person by way of search of premises or summons or requiring production of accounts, documents or other evidences; or an audit has been initiated against that person and such audit or inquiry/investigation is pending as on 1.3.2013. In such a case, the declaration filed by such a person will not be accepted by recording the reasons in writing.
 
Last Date For availing Scheme:-
The assessee can file the declaration under this scheme only upto 31st December 2013.
 
Manner of payment of declared dues:-
The assessee availing the scheme will have to pay minimum 50% tax dues upto 31st December 2013. The remaining amount shall be paid upto 30th June, 2014. If the declarant fails to pay said tax upto 30th June, 2014, he can pay the same upto 31st December 2014 along with interest from 1st July 2014 to the date of payment. Proof of payment is also required to be submitted to the concerned officer.
 
What if the declarant fails to pay declared dues?
As per proposed section 100, if the assessee fails to pay the tax dues, then such dues along with interest will be recovered as per provisions of Section 87. Section 87 prescribes the modes of recovery of any amount due to government. This section is harshest section of service tax law which says that the sum due to government will be treated as if it were an arrear of land revenue. Thus, the defaulted amount can be recovered by attaching the movable and immovable properties of the declarant. Simultaneously, fresh proceedings for recovery of interest and penalty can be initiated by issuing a show cause notice. This is because the proposed section 98 says that where the benefit of this scheme will be extended only after the entire payment has been made and the designated authority has issued an acknowledgement of discharge of dues.
 
Where the assessee files the substantially incorrect declaration:-
This scheme prescribes that the declarant has to file the declaration with the designated authority. Designated authority is defined as an officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise as notified by the Commissioner of Central Excise. Further, proposed section 101 provides that where the declaration is found substantially incorrect by the Commissioner, show cause notice is to be served for recovery of tax dues not paid or short paid. This section indicates that the designated authority (Assistant Commissioner) is not allowed to review the declaration and the same is to be reviewed by the Commissioner of Central Excise. Also, the show cause notice is to be issued for recovery of service tax dues, penalty and interest still not covered under the proposed provisions.  
 
Whether the honest assessees are fool!
Yes it the answer, due to following reasons:-

  • The scheme is applicable to full defaulters only. If an assessee who honestly files the returns and due any reason fails to pay service tax i.e. partly defaulter, then he will not be eligible for the scheme. But an assessee who has not filed the return and has also not paid the tax i.e. fully defaulters, will be eligible for scheme.
  • Further this scheme also prescribes that where any person has filed the declaration under this scheme and he does not pay the dues till 30.6.2014; still has option to pay the same with interest for six months only from 1.7.2014 to 31.12.2014. Penalty still not imposable.
  • Also, where the assessee makes substantially incorrect declaration, proposed section 101 provides that show cause notice is to be served for recovery of tax dues not paid or short paid. Further, this show cause notice cannot be issued after expiry of one year from the date of declaration. Also, the declaration cannot be reviewed by the designated officer, it will be reviewed by the Commissioner. Thus, even after making the incorrect declaration, there is chance of escaping and even after the declaration is substantially incorrect, the recovery can be made of service tax only as per section 101. This is another thing that the benefit of this scheme will be disallowed and another proceeding can be invoked for recovery of interest and penalty. 

 
While parting:-
While proposing the scheme, the Finance Minister said that only 700000 assessees are filing the Service Return out of 1700000 registered assessees. In the view of authors of this article, this statics may not be correct. Recently, the letters for non filing of returns have been issued in all the four range offices of Central Excise in the area the authors are practicing. However, it was found that more than 90% of the letters, as issued to their clients, this contention was found to be incorrect. While discussing this fact with the other consultants operating in their area, the same fact came out. This seems to be a software error. Therefore if Hon’ble Finance Minister has proposed this scheme based on this wrong data, then, this scheme may not turn out so useful, rather it will discourage the honest assessees. After the 24 hours of announcement of this scheme when the authors are finalizing this article, the feedback coming from their clients may be the best closing line of this article “In view of Finance Minister, this scheme may be his Master Stroke but in view of Honest Assessees it is nothing but only a “Defaulter Friendly Scheme”.
 

Comments

  • jay k sharma on 25 August, 2013 wrote:

    Pradeep ji I have read many articles,on vces by varies authors,but ur current article is quite precise,and ur ability to explain the subject in a very simple way.makes readers query solved when he endsup reading.thanks to you,as without going to sections/chapter/sub.section(which reader is not acquitted with)this scheme is truly as authors is "Defaulters Friendly"
  • jay k sharma on 25 August, 2013 wrote:

    Pradeep ji I have read many articles,on vces by varies authors,but ur current article is quite precise,and ur ability to explain the subject in a very simple way.makes readers query solved when he endsup reading.thanks to you,as without going to sections/chapter/sub.section(which reader is not acquitted with)this scheme is truly as authors is "Defaulters Friendly"
  • rangaswamy r on 10 April, 2013 wrote:

    Dear Mr.Jain, Your article is informative and thought-provoking. What happens to a person who had not registered but is now willing to opt for amnesty scheme? Can he now register and pay tax? Regards

Post a Comment



Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com