Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Publish Date: 08 Sep, 2015
Print   |    |  Comment

THERE IS RATE CHANGE # RETURN UTILITY # NO MORE UTILITY

THERE IS RATE CHANGE # RETURN UTILITY # NO MORE UTILITY
 

An article by:-
CA. Pradeep Jain
CA. Preeti Parihar
CA. Vaibhav Bothra
 

Introduction:-
“Online” - the most used word in modern world; whether it is a “person” or a “procedure”, everyone and everything is online now. Compliance procedures of most of the legal provisions have become online, somewhere it is optional and somewhere it is mandatory. In the service tax too, concept of online filing of return was first introduced for big taxpayers; w.e.f. 1.10.2011. Since then, the service tax return utility has been a classical example of both efficient data compiler and technical hurdles. The Service tax which itself is so much complicated containing a plethora of provisions, becomes scarier when a rate change takes effect. This becomes even more mind boggling when the rate change happens in between of a year. The after effects of this rate change proved a pain most when filing the service tax return. This article explains this pain of tax payers.
 
Analysis of legal provisions:-
The change in rate of service tax is the most complicated thing faced by the assessees. Last change in the service tax rate was in the year 2012-13 which was perhaps the most complicated change as there was transformation of service tax law by way of introduction of negative list concept. However, since then, things have simplified much as the transitional period has passed. Here, in this article, we are talking about the effect of rate change while filing the service tax return online. Before coming to the point, it would be better to discuss the provisions applicable in case of change in the rate of service tax. According to Point of Taxation Rules, 2011; if any advance is received against a service to be provided in future, the service tax is to be paid at the time of receipt of such advance. However, if the service is not yet provided and invoice is also not issued and there is change in rate of service tax; the service tax has to paid on the entire value as per new rate. Thus, the advance on which tax was earlier paid with old rate; will now be subject to new rate. This can be understood with the help of following example:-
Advance Received                         Rs. 50000/-
Date of advance                             1.4.2015
Service tax rate                               12.36%
Service tax paid on 5.5.2015      50000 * 12.36% = Rs. 6180/-.
Change in rate of service tax       1.6.2015
New rate of service tax                 14%
Date of provision of service        1.7.2015
Date of issue of invoice                5.7.2015
In above case, since the provision of service and issue of invoice (i.e. two events) are after the change in rate; new rate will be applicable on the entire service value. Thus, now the service tax payable on advance will be calculated as follows:-
50000*14% = Rs. 7000/-.
Since service tax of Rs. 6180/- has already been paid by 5.5.2015; differential service tax of Rs. 820/- (being 7000-6180) would be now payable.
The question is how and where this differential service tax of Rs. 820/- will be represented in the ST-3 return.
 
History of problems in return utility:-
In 2012-2013, the return utility (July-Sept)  had the facility of inserting an additional row and mentioning that differential rate of tax; thereby showing the additional tax to be paid in a particular month for a particular service. It had the facility of inserting any rate irrespective of the fact that statutory rate of service tax applicable as on date is different. Thus, in the given example, in the year 2012-13; we could show both the transactions of taxes paid and rates applied. There was facility in the return utility to consider the change in the rate of service tax and all the relevant details could be presented by way of inserting a new row below the main details.
Later on, the return utilities have undergone changes. In the later period till now, the return utility does not accept any rate other than the statutory rate applicable. Thus, now, if one tries to enter any rate other than the rate applicable as on date, the utility does not accept the same and the return gets void. Thus the return filer has to strictly follow the application of statutory rate only. For this the data of that particular period had to be adjusted so that net tax paid for that particular period could be arrived in the return.
 
Rate change w.e.f. 1.6.2015:-
W.e.f. 01/06/2015, the rate of service tax has been increased to 14% from 12.36%. Thus, a no. of assessees who have received advances and have already paid service tax on the same with old rate; will now be required to pay the differential tax. It is worth noting here that the last few return utilities are not accepting the rate of tax if it is other than statutory rate. However, since there was no change in the rate of service tax during this period, this problem did not come in limelight. Now, when there is change in service tax rate, again, the same problem would be faced since there will be two sets of service tax rates applicable for the same taxable service and no mechanism in the online utility to display the same.
 
While parting:-
Online filing has made the life of tax payers easier and hassle free; however, at the same time one or other fault in the return utility creates the hassle and it becomes a tough job to file the returns online. One such fault is being discussed in this article which can create problems in the coming month. There is still time in the due date of filing the ST-3 return. The authorities can manage to update the return utility as soon as possible. If it is not updated, a no. of online return filers will be harassed with no fault at their end.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com