Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 08 Sep, 2015
Print   |    |  Comment

THERE IS RATE CHANGE # RETURN UTILITY # NO MORE UTILITY

THERE IS RATE CHANGE # RETURN UTILITY # NO MORE UTILITY
 

An article by:-
CA. Pradeep Jain
CA. Preeti Parihar
CA. Vaibhav Bothra
 

Introduction:-
“Online” - the most used word in modern world; whether it is a “person” or a “procedure”, everyone and everything is online now. Compliance procedures of most of the legal provisions have become online, somewhere it is optional and somewhere it is mandatory. In the service tax too, concept of online filing of return was first introduced for big taxpayers; w.e.f. 1.10.2011. Since then, the service tax return utility has been a classical example of both efficient data compiler and technical hurdles. The Service tax which itself is so much complicated containing a plethora of provisions, becomes scarier when a rate change takes effect. This becomes even more mind boggling when the rate change happens in between of a year. The after effects of this rate change proved a pain most when filing the service tax return. This article explains this pain of tax payers.
 
Analysis of legal provisions:-
The change in rate of service tax is the most complicated thing faced by the assessees. Last change in the service tax rate was in the year 2012-13 which was perhaps the most complicated change as there was transformation of service tax law by way of introduction of negative list concept. However, since then, things have simplified much as the transitional period has passed. Here, in this article, we are talking about the effect of rate change while filing the service tax return online. Before coming to the point, it would be better to discuss the provisions applicable in case of change in the rate of service tax. According to Point of Taxation Rules, 2011; if any advance is received against a service to be provided in future, the service tax is to be paid at the time of receipt of such advance. However, if the service is not yet provided and invoice is also not issued and there is change in rate of service tax; the service tax has to paid on the entire value as per new rate. Thus, the advance on which tax was earlier paid with old rate; will now be subject to new rate. This can be understood with the help of following example:-
Advance Received                         Rs. 50000/-
Date of advance                             1.4.2015
Service tax rate                               12.36%
Service tax paid on 5.5.2015      50000 * 12.36% = Rs. 6180/-.
Change in rate of service tax       1.6.2015
New rate of service tax                 14%
Date of provision of service        1.7.2015
Date of issue of invoice                5.7.2015
In above case, since the provision of service and issue of invoice (i.e. two events) are after the change in rate; new rate will be applicable on the entire service value. Thus, now the service tax payable on advance will be calculated as follows:-
50000*14% = Rs. 7000/-.
Since service tax of Rs. 6180/- has already been paid by 5.5.2015; differential service tax of Rs. 820/- (being 7000-6180) would be now payable.
The question is how and where this differential service tax of Rs. 820/- will be represented in the ST-3 return.
 
History of problems in return utility:-
In 2012-2013, the return utility (July-Sept)  had the facility of inserting an additional row and mentioning that differential rate of tax; thereby showing the additional tax to be paid in a particular month for a particular service. It had the facility of inserting any rate irrespective of the fact that statutory rate of service tax applicable as on date is different. Thus, in the given example, in the year 2012-13; we could show both the transactions of taxes paid and rates applied. There was facility in the return utility to consider the change in the rate of service tax and all the relevant details could be presented by way of inserting a new row below the main details.
Later on, the return utilities have undergone changes. In the later period till now, the return utility does not accept any rate other than the statutory rate applicable. Thus, now, if one tries to enter any rate other than the rate applicable as on date, the utility does not accept the same and the return gets void. Thus the return filer has to strictly follow the application of statutory rate only. For this the data of that particular period had to be adjusted so that net tax paid for that particular period could be arrived in the return.
 
Rate change w.e.f. 1.6.2015:-
W.e.f. 01/06/2015, the rate of service tax has been increased to 14% from 12.36%. Thus, a no. of assessees who have received advances and have already paid service tax on the same with old rate; will now be required to pay the differential tax. It is worth noting here that the last few return utilities are not accepting the rate of tax if it is other than statutory rate. However, since there was no change in the rate of service tax during this period, this problem did not come in limelight. Now, when there is change in service tax rate, again, the same problem would be faced since there will be two sets of service tax rates applicable for the same taxable service and no mechanism in the online utility to display the same.
 
While parting:-
Online filing has made the life of tax payers easier and hassle free; however, at the same time one or other fault in the return utility creates the hassle and it becomes a tough job to file the returns online. One such fault is being discussed in this article which can create problems in the coming month. There is still time in the due date of filing the ST-3 return. The authorities can manage to update the return utility as soon as possible. If it is not updated, a no. of online return filers will be harassed with no fault at their end.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com